this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
667 points (99.6% liked)

Political Memes

5599 readers
2915 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 148 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

I think filing a fraudulent DMCA takedown should be a felony and the ceo of the organization that filed is the presumptive fraudster unless he can prove that his employee filed it against his explicit order not too. Also, a DMCA notice should be invalid and ignored unless signed by the criminally responsible CEO.

[–] LodeMike 77 points 6 hours ago

It is a felony. You have to submit a form under penalty of pujury. At least for YouTube.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 48 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well, the justice department isn't going to do anything about them, so maybe something else needs to be done...

[–] parody@lemmings.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure which peaceful opportunities you’re referring to

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Pieceful, as in "of pieces", may be a bit closer to the mark here.

[–] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 hours ago

To shreds you say?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think filing a fraudulent DMCA takedown should be a felony

Isn't it?

[–] ValorieAF@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Not for corporations.

spoilerIf it isn't clear, yes it is, but corporations can get away with it

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Is it fraudulent or are we about to find out Satan himself finds UHC to be pure evil because they've trademarked/copywrite whatever CEO shooter images and Luigis image to profit off of this situation?

I would not for one second put it past them.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You can't copyright the likeness of another actual person

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

With enough money, anything is possible.