this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
163 points (98.8% liked)

chapotraphouse

13640 readers
902 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 54 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah this is too much. If he was like 40 or something going after an 18 year old it'd raise my eyebrow but a 4 year difference, 18 and 22? C'mon.

[–] ChestRockwell@hexbear.net 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Literally conforms to the divide by two add 7 rule!

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Someone I respect told me recently this rule is problematic and shouldn’t be used. Not saying I agree with them but it doesn’t seem to be as universally accepted as I thought.

[–] ChestRockwell@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

Very curious why, since it feels very accurate for the 16-26 range (i.e. same 4 year gap is very different from a 19 and 15 year old vs 24 and 20 year old)

[–] GnastyGnuts@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Some people do "half your age plus ten", some do "keep it within ten years difference" or "keep it within five".

[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

I'd probably go with amount of control one person can have over another. If both people are materially and independently secure (housing, food etc), and neither's position in life is contingent on the other's approval (e.g. teacher/student, boss/worker etc), then its probably fine. Or at least, more likely to be fine than a hard and fast age rule. There's a lot of psychological fuckery that can still go on, but how would one assess that from the outside?