this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
125 points (96.3% liked)

chapotraphouse

13640 readers
902 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.ph/DjZAQ

The surplus equipment included “hoses, nozzles, turnouts, helmets, body armor and other associated personal protective equipment.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AmarkuntheGatherer@lemmygrad.ml 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Westerners look down on the Romans throwing clothing and jewellery into funeral pyres, decrying how hysterical they were. And then they do this shit.

Firefighters in areas with regular forest fires don't have "surplus" equipment morons, only reserved for later use. This is what happens when an entire society live their lives convinced that infrequent disasters and so-called worst case scenarios may as well not happen.

[–] SuperNovaCouchGuy2@hexbear.net 27 points 3 days ago

Westerners look down on the Romans

The Roman Empire is fellatiated by the Western Zietgeist as an origin point that "western culture/values/civilization" can be traced back to. It was a cruel shithole slave empire that mass murdered jews (literal antisemetism) and according to His Holiness St. Bhagavan Shree Matt Christman (SAW) provided the framework for the same anti-human "private property" laws that exist today in the West.

Wider point still stands thoughbeit the USA is a stupid country

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Westerners look down on the Romans throwing clothing and jewellery into funeral pyres, decrying how hysterical they were.

I'll be real. I've never heard anyone even utter one murmur of such acts to the point I didn't even know they did such a thing.

Generally, what few depictions of the romans that make it into the collective unconsciousness tend to be positive in wider Yankee society. Even the most common negative depictions of them are usually played off humorously, such as their aqueducts being lined with lead therefore they all suffered lead poisoning just like us! (A common 'fun' fact you'd have most likely learned - either directly or cultural osmosis - if you were among the late boomer, gen X and early millenial.)

If you're a common Yankee prole you're more likely to learn about the "barbarity" of some regional Indian funeral rites as a form of "subtle" justification for British colonization and imperial conquest of the Indian subcontinent, than you are of learning of the wanton acts of cruelty the Roman slavers inflict upon their captives.

Of course with the era of multi-media, voyeurs of Roman extravagance have an ever-overflowing troth of slop to feast from, so there's a chance that some chunk of the West is actually aware of that Roman funeral act. But being honest they're probably in some form of perverted pleasure over that knowledge and posses a twisted reactionary desire to bring it back.

[–] AmarkuntheGatherer@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I heard it a few times, mostly about Caesar's funeral. Every time the person talking/writing about it has the tone of "look at these crazy people giving in to hysteria." I couldn't say it's definitely true, not my area.

You're completely right on how they're portrayed generally. Storytellers will regularly mention generals making a fortune out of loot and slaves, neither the teller not listener will ask what that entails or how moral it is. Folks read Cicero proudly talking about being a slumlord and not bat an eye, at this point I wonder if they just compartmentalise it all, turn off major parts of their brain when the subject of certain ancient peoples comes up.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago

Friend I think you'd really enjoy reading "The Assassination of Julius Caesar" by Dr. Michael Parenti. It's a nice book that touches on everything we've seen here and a bit more.

[–] prole@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Firefighters in areas with regular forest fires don't have "surplus" equipment

They definitely do? Surplus is more than just extra shit sitting in storage until you need it. You gotta maintain that equipment, which requires people, time, and money. If the equipment isn't maintained it would be just as useless as not having it at all. Obviously there is a line somewhere when it becomes too costly to maintain surplus equipment and it's better to get rid of it.

I'm not saying LAFD is run well or defending any of this shit, but to call people morons (kinda ableist btw) over this is silly and you're wrong anyway

Disaster management is preparing for the worst scenarios, that includes having more equipment then just enough for the people already signed up to do the work. I didn't say or imply that they should just hoard stuff and forget about it.

California has wildfires regularly. They should have a whole lot of people on the payroll as regular firefighters, train potential volunteers to assist in fires, and have trucks, planes etc ready for this exact situation. This state and its cities are extremely wealthy. I can criticise countries like Greece and Turkey when they make errors, call out blatant mistakes, but at the end of the day I won't call them imbeciles as I do people in charge in California and LA. One has all the resources in the world, the other doesn't.