this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
996 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

14352 readers
3282 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, I was already out of my depth with the entomology and ophthalmology discussed here. The economics of bee optometry might be a bridge too far for me. Can a bee make enough honey to afford such lenses? If so, does it improve the bee's ability to make honey enough to justify the cost? I have no idea and no clue regarding how to investigate this issue.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

perhaps we're coming at this from the wrong direction, does a bee even need lenses? maybe what they actually need is just eye protection, which would make everything much cheaper

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

Correction or no, it seems something like goggles is the solution. Boggles?

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting hypothesis. I guess the best way to test it would be to try to sell bee safety glasses to beekeepers.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can alway upsell them on bee ears to hold the glasses on

Genius. Genetic modification of bees. What could possibly go wrong?