this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
489 points (99.6% liked)

politics

23225 readers
3476 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A majority of Americans say President Trump is a "dangerous dictator" who poses a threat to democracy and believe he's overstepped his authority by actions such as the mass firing of federal employees, a new survey says.

The wide-ranging poll released Tuesday, on Trump's 100th day in office, is the latest sign of him losing support for his immigration and economic policies — the two issues that largely fueled his election.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 87 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

FTA:

For example, most Americans (61%) disagree that the federal government should place immigrants who are in the country illegally in internment camps guarded by the U.S. military until they can be deported.

Only 61%? Have I lost my fucking mind? This feels unbelievable to read.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 83 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

I think the biggest thing I learned this last election is just how much of the country are HUGE pieces of shit. I thought there were maybe 15-20% that were on board with this Nazi shit. It's well over double that.

We fucked up during Reconstruction, and we fucked up again after WWII. Every single Confederate/Nazi should've been disposed of and never allowed to have any influence whatsoever. Instead the cancer has metastasized to every single organ in the body.

[–] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago

Sherman had the right idea.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 28 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think your original estimate is correct, but the problem is that they've captured enough media outlets that sow doubt about right-wingers' true natures to make another 20-30% just uncertain enough to vote for the nazis.

Agree with your remediation, though. Confederates, Nazis, and J6ers are enemies of the state and should be forever barred from holding public office.

It's a ton of the media really, not 'just enough' afaict. So much reporting from all the US mainstream media treats everything he says with kid gloves. If he invaded canada tomorrow the headline on CNN would be something like "US military deployed in proactive peacekeeping mission to the north".

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 12 points 8 hours ago

We have to learn our lesson and not repeat it no matter how many crocodile tears are pleas to Civility and mercy there are, even if they come from liberals. Not going far enough is a bigger risk than going too far

[–] Retreaux@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Operation Paperclip would like to have a word.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, unfortunately it’s about 1/3 of the country

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 21 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Right? Like I thought everyone agreed the Japanese internment camps was a dark spot on our history.

Guess it's just because we like the Japanese now?

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah. I'm in Merced, CA, which was one of the initial collection points for detained Japanese Americans before they were put in the internment camps. We have a little memorial at the fair grounds, which is where they were collected up at. I've always believed that people 50, 100, 200, and 2000 years ago really aren't fundamentally different than people today, and anyone today who professes to be disgusted by Jim Crow but still embraces modern forms of oppression would have embraced Jim Crow back then. We're seeing that now. These folks, without even a second thought, will eagerly embrace Hispanic internment camps while denouncing the Japanese internment camps as something that never should have happened, and dismiss any semblance with a thought terminating "but this is different."

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 10 points 8 hours ago

This is really well said. Throughout history, you can reliably find people on both sides of moral and humanitarian issues like this. There were Roman elite who spoke out against slavery in antiquity, there were Brits who mocked the American Colonies for owning slaves while founding a country based on freedom, there have always been men who believed in equal treatment and rights for women. Right and wrong is usually pretty clear, and in general regular people throughout the ages have been able to recognize which is which. Our values haven’t changed much, but our systems of power and accountability have.

That said, I also believe a good amount of the right wing backlash against the internment camps was performative. Because up until relatively recently, many racists themselves understood that their beliefs were terrible, so they at least tried to hide their true feelings and spoke out against obvious atrocities like this in public. But that was only so they could be accepted by the wider culture, and so they could continue to participate in left-coded spaces. They don’t need to hide how awful they are anymore because the president is leading by example.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I thought everyone agreed the Japanese internment camps was a dark spot on our history.

They did, but a frightening percentage of the population were bothered that it didn't go far enough.

Edit: in other words, vastly different reasons why some thought it was a dark spot.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

For any election anywhere, approximately 35% are going to be batshit. 61% is super close to "everyone who isn't batshit" category. That's an amazing election number.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 10 points 8 hours ago

If that’s true, sounds like NOW is the time to ACT since we aren’t picking up anyone else. Right?

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

That fact is going to haunt me in the late hours of the day. I didn't think that the second standard deviation of political views equated to "absolutely batshit insane".

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The movement of the Overton Window has caused some significant issues, that's for sure.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It has not. This is the same group of people who were (and still are) young earth creationists 20 years ago. 1/3 of the American population is just completely divorced from reality, and will believe any stupid bullshit an authority figure tells them.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's sort of the nice way to put dumb, being conned, ignorant, racist and shitty.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I’m really curious what percentage of conservatives fit in each of those buckets. Like 40% ignorant/lazy, 25% conned, 35% racist and shitty. Dunno how you’d find that out though.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Consider that surveys also indicate that 30-40% of the US are essentially “Trump No Matter What” people. Maybe some variation depending on the issue.

So 60% isn’t too far off the mark for people not supporting everything trump does.

E: 48.3% of registered voters voted for Harris. Maybe if that extra ~12% of Americans that are unhappy about Trump had gotten off their asses and voted we might be complaining about a crappy Neo-Liberal instead of a straight up fascist takeover.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Day 100 of not letting it be forgotten that the republicans led a massive, distributed campaign of targeted vote rejection. They spent years getting true believers and laws and rules to support them put into place throughout states and counties, and it bore fruit. There was a disproportionately high number of ballot challenges this last election, and black folks got their ballots tossed a staggering 900% more often than white folks. There's likely a very large number of people who thought they voted in this last election and have no idea that their ballot got tossed. This is the real shit that that dumbfuck starlink conspiracy buried. I'm still in awe that the Kamalampaign just basically shrugged and went "okie dokie! Pack your bags, Katy Perry, party's over!" instead of doing the normal investigations, challenges, etc. Mind you, some of that IS normal, and double checking via the courts is a good thing to do; not like the Trump campaign and its like 300 bullshit ass claims, but more like ten or twelve claims with some actual weight.