What would constitute proof? We can't rely on Hasan's word. We can't rely on the word of the people around him because he may be deceiving them. What would prove it to you? He couldn't film it. He wasn't arrested so there's no public log. We can't get the video footage from the airport. He wasn't cited, so no paper trail there.

It's okay to be skeptical but you have to think further than just asking questions. You want proof but how do you get it? How do you validate the proof? If it's too difficult to get the evidence you need, then what do you do about it?

[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They just need to convince the feds to admit it since due to the logic presented anyone who is a witness could just be paid off by Hasan so the only trustworthy witnesses would be the feds themself.

Edit: Just saw an article on it below, saying they at least admitted to an inspection but again, that doesn't verify the majority of his claims so they would be looking for the feds to admit to political intimidation to prove it.