this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
417 points (98.4% liked)

politics

23948 readers
2794 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump on Saturday said there would be “serious consequences” if tech mogul Elon Musk funds Democratic candidates to run against Republicans who vote in favor of the GOP’s sweeping budget bill.

“If he does, he’ll have to pay the consequences for that,” Trump told NBC News in a phone interview, but declined to share what those consequences would be.

“He’ll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,” he added.

Trump also said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk after a feud between the two men erupted into public view earlier this week.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 19 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Trans people, immigrants, etc fearing for their lives, being kidnapped to a foreign death camp, and going full conservationist on climate change is a lot bigger of a difference than 1.3%.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I would still be in the US if Kamala had won. I'm trans, latina, and in a w4w relationship. But in retrospect, I'm so glad I left

I'm still fucking tired of being treated as a political pawn by so called "leftists" who don't actually give a shit about intersectionality

[–] arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

Where did you go? I've been considering it, but I'm not sure where I'd want to live since it feels like the world's on fire.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I'm not in the same boat, but I empathize. I want the fuck out. Best of luck, and I hope you're safe.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

So much this. So tired of hearing how the Democrats are not perfect. They are a human institution, so of course they are not perfect. Whole lot of people letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. Do I think Democrats can be pushed to do better? Like virtually every other Democratic voter, hell yes, I think so.

Do I think pretending both parties are virtually the same is some truly deep truth or even the least bit helpful? Not even a little bit. But I sure know that lots of people think "both sides" is a great shorthand to showing how insightful they think they are....sigh.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Percentage of US population that is trans/enby:

1.3%

Where is your God now

(It's actually a range but close enough)

I also mentioned immigrants, and etc. Etc because there are lots of other people being targeted that I don't have the energy to list.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee -1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Name one policy plank from Kamala's campaign that was going to make a meaningful impact to climate change. As I recall, she danced around the subject and offered a little drilling, as a treat. The democrats were already softening on trans rights, and, as I recall, the Kamalampaign shied away from saying anything pro-trans and simply yelled about how bad Trump would be instead. That was basically the whole campaign-- they had three moves:

Hey, Kamalampaign, we'd really like to see thing, what's your policy proposals on thing?

  1. Uhhh... Well, you see, Trump is going to be much worse for you than we are.

  2. Oh, look, it's a celebrity guest appearance! Everyone say hi to Katy Perry!

  3. I can't believe that you'd have the nerve to even ask questions at a time like this, unbelievable that you'd even ask about thing when the alternative is Trump!

Which isn't surprising. That's basically how the HRC campaign played it ~~when they won in 2016 against Trump~~, and doubly unsurprising considering that the democrats didn't trust Kamala enough and decided to stick her with Hillary's extremely competent campaign leadership. There's no substance there, no promise or prospect of doing any better, no reason to vote for the candidate, just reasons to vote against the other one. I don't know who the fuck at the DNC got it in their head that that was a winning strategy, because to my knowledge, it is consistently a bad strategy in marketing, politics, business, and basically everything. And, well, they've won 33% of the times they've tried it, but by God, don't let a god awful track record get in the way of the democrats fucking it up again.

[–] spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The IRA is getting gutted and Trump is trying to force coal plants to stay open. Even if Kamala did absolutely nothing, that would still be much better for the climate. 1.3% is not a big number.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee -2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I really need you to understand how absolutely cooked the democrats are and the rest of us along with them when the only vision for the future that the democrats will commit to is "we promise to just not be as bad as that guy lmao"

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

In the primary? Dean Phillips. In the general, Kamala, and I'm not afraid to share that I think a big reason why the democrats seem to fucking suck at beating Trump is their utter lack of vision.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Don't need to, Trump is actively stopping federal progress on climate change. Kamala having zero policy on it, doing literally nothing and maintaining the status quo is always better than accelerationism under Trump.