this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
139 points (96.6% liked)

memes

23329 readers
270 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but it's not like secularism stooped the muurdering

Yup; I had a similar conversation with a lib I know who insists that religion is the cause of all wars and oppression in the world and thinks that when I mention secularism being guilty of similar that I'm talking about China or North Korea (those are a whole other bag of worms I decided not to get into cause it would've taken us WAY offtopic), instead I pointed out that France prided itself on being secular for ages and their colonialism was utterly barbaric, and pushed French supremacy (killing local languages and cultures for example, which is why so many countries in Africa speak French as their main language), and this was not related to religion at all; ultimately capitalism is very adaptive and would use either religion or secularism to murder nations and rob their resources. The French, back then as well as now, believe themselves culturally superior to so many nations they've brutalized and colonized; the violent British treatment of India didn't come from a religious stance, it came from a cultural and racial one. Certainly in both North and South America people were oppressed because of religious differences (even recently, during the coup in Bolivia, the woman responsible referred to the indigenous population as Satan worshippers which.....is both stupid and makes no sense), but then even with Israel, as people have pointed out previously, you have atheists (I hate this; I keep misspelling this the first time because 'i before e except after c') who don't believe in God who still consider themselves God's chosen people, which makes zero sense.

[โ€“] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree mostly with what you say, and maybe I'm just picking on a semantic misstep, but secularism isn't "guilty of similar".

Religion is the cause of at least some meaningful number of wars and major oppression, and although it didn't drive colonialism, it certainly helped justify colonial oppression. Whereas secularism has effectively never been the cause for any of the above.

Wanting to keep religiosity out of official law does not bolster colonialism or ethnonationalism. I would argue that being somewhat secular avoided those things being (somehow) even worse than they were.