this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
296 points (88.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26959 readers
495 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll go first. Mine is that I can't stand the Deadpool movies. They are self aware and self referential to an obnoxious degree. It's like being continually reminded that I am in a movie. I swear the success of that movie has directly lead to every blockbuster having to have a joke every 30 seconds

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago (8 children)

I like The Last Jedi.

That should be controversial enough.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think this is more popular than you think. Most serious SW fans appreciate Rian Johnson's attempt to take the franchise somewhere it had never been before, storytelling-wise, and the shitty retcon-fest that was ROS seems to have made it better by comparison. I've seen plenty of people online say it's the best aged film out of the sequel films.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Love TFA. Love TLJ. Love parts of ROTS but it's.... rough. Not a movie I'll choose to rewatch without a really strong reason. Most of it is so disjointed. You can tell there were so many ideas that were cut from the movie and things that were put together in ways that weren't. Then there's that fucking dagger...

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Weird you could replace the phantom menace with rots, dagger with "podracer" and your have another completely true sentence!

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The movie was alright.

“Somehow the emperor returned” was terrible.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (6 children)

“Somehow the emperor returned” was terrible.

Okay. Rise of Skywalker is a walking pile of dog shit that has a wildly inconsistent take on everything. However. I have never had a single problem with that line and I am stunned so many people did. That was a rebel talking to other rebels. Why, exactly, would they know anything about how Palpatine returned? Dude was on a planet out in the middle of uncharted space. I literally cannot think of another way for them to tell each other that Palpatine returned without evoking vague imagery like that. They literally do not know what happened.

[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's not about the line itself, but more the sentiment behind it. The fact that the Emperor is just suddenly back without any buildup or hinting in the previous two movies is the problem.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

First time I have ever seen that sentiment shared when people are talking about the line. Everytime it's always people whining saying the line doesn't make sense.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The line is just funny because its a great tldr of the movie

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

It makes sense that the rebels didn't know about it. It doesn't make sense that the first the audience hears about it is that line. It feels lazy. They could have mentioned, in an offhand way, that the remnants of the Empire is pursuing cloning tech. Not only would this tie the final trilogy to the second trilogy. (First? Episodes 1-3, anyway) But it would also make that line make way more sense.

As as much as the Thrawn trilogy feels like bad fanfic, it does tie the whole clone wars/rebellion thing together, and features someone who comes back as a clone. I think it would have made a way better trilogy than what we got.

[–] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

“The dead speak! The galaxy has heard a mysterious broadcast, a threat of REVENGE in the sinister voice of the late EMPEROR PALPATINE.

Because it makes zero sense. What possible reason would Palpatine reveal himself. It's not just against logic, it's against character. Yes, that particular line was a rebel talking to a rebel, but it shouldn't have happened at all.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Against character? No. It wasn't. You can make a lot of fair criticisms but to say that the galaxies biggest narcissist wouldn't narcissist himself up further and be like GUESS WHAT BITCHES IM BACK? That's just silly

[–] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Darth Sidious spent the first two movies cosplaying a senator. He is the titular Phantom Menace, as in "hidden". Palplatine would absolutely stay hidden if everyone thought he was dead.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

He stayed hidden during that period because it served him. He showed his true colors (literally) in the fight with Windu and dropped all pretense. He didn't even try anymore in the Senate. Just went full authoritarian and made it all about himself. The next 20 years were no different. Fuck sakes, he was still cosplaying as a senator but openly running around being a Sith and taunting Jedi as seen in the clone wars show.

While he does keep a low profile when needed for his plans, he will kick open the doors and announce his presence when he is confident his plans have gotten to a certain point where he's sure he cannot be stopped. Saying he would absolutely stay hidden 100% is to ignore a massive amount about the character.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Because it was just saying out loud what hollywood writers have been doing on movies for a while. "somehow this movie happens. Just pay us."

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

The problem is the movie didn't show him returning. Instead they're just like hey Palps is back! With absolutely no lead up or anything. They should have actually shown the message or whatever it was he sent out to get everyone all worked up in the first place. Then that line wouldn't have sounded so cheap.

[–] JPJones@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago

I can only speak for myself, but it wasn't so much the line as the hand-waving that came with it. It was more that I found the line relatable, but you're right about it being appropriate for the scene.

[–] meathorse@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

All I could think of when he said that was, Princess Bunhead in Thumbwars: "I escaped somehow, let's go!"

[–] Tyrangle@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Remember when they snuck off on some escape ship to go get help for their crew in imminent danger and then decided to dick around on some horse racing casino planet? It's like they completely forgot why they were there. I thought TLJ had some neat ideas but I don't know how anyone can overlook that weird loss of urgency in the middle of the film. It's like your house is on fire and your family is trapped upstairs, so you run over to a neighbor's house to call the fire department, but you discover that they got some dog fighting thing going on in the backyard so you decide to go deal with that first, then you call the fire department but it turns out the dispatcher was in cahoots with the arsonist who started it in the first place, and then you return home with your tail between your legs and your mom didn't even know you had left. The whole second act could have been a dream sequence and it wouldn't have changed a thing.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

If you rip out everyone involved in the casino planet, you have a really cool dark and surprising twist on the franchise. The only really interesting things in the whole trilogy happened in The Last Jedi

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 months ago

I didnt hate it, i just thought it was too predictable.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not controversial. You like what you like.

Now, if you had said something like "The Last Jedi is a good movie." Well, that's demonstrably untrue.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nah. Disagree. It is a good movie.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It LOOKS good, I'll give you that. The salt planet with the red soil was inspired.

It's too bad Rian Johnson didn't get an average 5th grader to proof read the script.

For example:

Leia and Rey have this touching scene where Leia gives her this tracking gem that will let her come back to the fleet no matter where they go.

Then, in the VERY SAME SCENE, the New Order pops out of hyperspace and another character says, out loud, "they tracked us through hyperspace???!? THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE!!!"

First - you literally just explained how yes, it was possible 2 sentences ago.

Second - Tracking devices have been a thing since the first Star Wars.

"TARKIN You're sure the homing beacon is secure aboard their ship? I'm taking an awful risk, Vader. This had better work."

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

No, I stand by the fact that it is a good movie. Just because it has some flaws doesn't make it universally bad. It's not even close to the worst movie in the franchise either. Rise of the Skywalker grabs that without hesitation (That outright is a TERRIBLE movie) but the Prequels are all significantly worse in both writing and direction than The Last Jedi. Revenge comes a lot closer and I'd say personally is tied with TLJ on coherence. George Lucas was a moron. He never had a plan but people constantly think he did. Within all three of the OT movies alone he keeps changing everything from characters to lore. The Prequels got worse because he had no one to temper him. That being said, this is about TLJ.

That being said, there's no issue with the writing there in my opinion. Leia and Rey do have a touching moment, sure, but that was in the Force Awakens not The Last Jedi. Leia also straight up never gives her that bracelet on screen because JJ Abraams is a complete and utter fuckwit. The scene in TLJ is between Finn and Leia where Leia reveals the beacon to Finn. He asks how Rey would find us and Leia and shows him. He says "A cloaked binary beacon." She says "To light her way home." You are right in that the scene does continue immediately into the First Order tracking them but how they tracked them was completely different. The beacon tells Rey (and only Rey) where Leia is when tracked. But Snokes vessel outright tracked them through lightspeed itself. They didn't check the location of her and then jump to her. They actively followed the fleet through hyperspace itself without needing end coordinates. This was shown later in the movie and Leia directly says it by saying "They tracked us through lightspeed.* Something that hasn't been shown to be possible on screen.

Yeah. They're in the same scene but that wasn't an accident. There wasn't people behind the scenes who were that monumentally braindead. That scene was written that way with the purpose of making people think that the two would be related. Now I will give you that it's not well written how they use that throughout the rest of the movie but it was put there on purpose. It was to make people doubt Leia (supporting him through the Poe arc, which worked way too well despite the fact that he did not have a singular leg to stand on with his entire argument despite everyone and their mother thinking he was right) and seem like the clear and obvious fix. They completely dropped the ball there, I admit. But overall I didn't have a problem with that scene specifically. Just how they used that scene. Especially considering that tracking device was never actually used. Seriously. They added in and then never really used it. I don't know if it ended up on the cutting room floor or what. The intention was clearly to fuck with the audience because Rey doesn't ever find the Resistance using that bracelet. She meets up with Kylo on Snokes ship and Kylo is the one who gives her the coordinates.

The logical writing progress would have been to have Finn doing his thing (that arc, I grant you, is fundamentally worthless. The whole casino segment is a waste of screentime and only manages to produce a couple of light gags which all focus on BB-8) and Poe advancing on Leias position during his mutiny. He gets to Leia and gets the bracelet, destroys it and they jump to lightspeed. Everyone breathes a sigh of relief and then the First Order shows back up anyway, having tracked them. Holdo has a scene of "I told you so", probably just by staring at him without saying anything, and then everyone freaks out on what to do. Leia is still out and Holdo is in command so she decides to try and ram them with the last lightspeed jump of the cruiser that they somehow manage to movie magic in the last second from all the X-wings, life support, yadda yadda. Forcing the rest to evacuate to Crait. Movie continues on as normal.

The issue to me isn't that the writing didn't make sense. It did. My issue was that they expected the audience to connect too many dots on their own. Ended up with people making different connections than were intended. Too many things were left on the cutting room floor while stuff like that Casino segment was allowed to go on for way too long. Or the kiss between Finn and Rose which was just fucking bizarre. So much so that even Finn in that scene has a look on his face like "What the fuck are you doing?" But with all the issues that TLJ has? I still find it to be a way more coherent story and more interesting one than either of the first two Prequels. And Rise of Skywalker because that movie is idiotic. Like a good script doctor could have fixed it and made it a decent movie but they made so many weird fucking decisions and bizarre writing choices that literally nothing about it makes sense. What pisses me off is people then blame Rian Johnson for the problems of Rise too when half of that was on the studio for not being able to make up their mind on directors/writers (that movie has way too many writers) and the other half falls squarely on the fanbase for reacting as strongly and negatively as they did to the first two sequels.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

91% of film critics agree it's a good movie. That's more than feel that way about Return of The Jedi. And way more than any of the prequels.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

91% of film critics didn't want to be on the wrong side of a rabid fanbase. ;)

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The rabbid die hard Star Wars fans are very loud about hating that film.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Sure, but the critics couldn't have known that when they wrote the reviews.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Liking a film that 91% of critics gave a positive rating is controversial?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

Best film from the 9. Has a very good story and leaves you wondering what is going on. It was exactly what it needed to be and did it in some new ways with older call backs. Seriously such a good flick.