this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
378 points (96.6% liked)

News

22869 readers
4244 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As the world grapples with the existential crisis of climate change, environmental activists want President Joe Biden to phase out the oil industry, and Republicans argue he’s already doing that. Meanwhile, the surprising reality is the United States is pumping oil at a blistering pace and is on track to produce more oil than any country has in history.

The United States is set to produce a global record of 13.3 million barrels per day of crude and condensate during the fourth quarter of this year, according to a report published Tuesday by S&P Global Commodity Insights.

Last month, weekly US oil production hit 13.2 million barrels per day, according to the US Energy Information Administration. That’s just above the Donald Trump-era record of 13.1 million set in early 2020 just before the Covid-19 crisis sent output and prices crashing.

That’s been helping to keep a lid on crude and gasoline prices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 33 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

only ~9% of passenger cars in the US are EVs. so, as much as people may wish that oil production would suddenly just stop, it'll be around as long as demand is, and unless you want to pay $5+/gallon again while hearing people screech "ThAnkS BidEN!11!!!", well, this is what you get.

don't blame him, blame people buying ICEs and EV manufacturers charging so much for them.

[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago (4 children)

mandate WFH wherever possible, institute generous EV tax rebates, etc etc

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

That takes care of a small fraction of oil.

Plastics production makes up ~45% of all petroleum production.

Then you have shipping. Aircraft. Trucking. Then you have passenger vehicles.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Aircraft are the exact reason we need to figure out how to restrict production enough to raise prices. New non-fossil fuels have been “almost here” for decades, but somehow never actually get adopted. It’s time to push airlines with the prospect of more expensive jet fuel.

And lead too. I used to fly so I understand a little about the difficulties the general aviation industry has in switching to an unleaded fuel for prop planes, and have even defended the industry for it. And it’s small and shrinking. But lead has really got to go and if it takes more serious price increases to encourage it, so be it

[–] Lazz45@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Where are you getting the 45% number? I am seeing petrochemicals (plastics, resins, and petroleum based feedstocks) @12.12% of total oil demand in 2022. I see that road (all forms of shipping and transport on roads/care with petroleum products like tar/asphalt) is 49.24% of demand.

Diving deeper into the transportation sector, light trucks + other trucks make up 57% of the transportation sector's petroleum usage. Following with cars/motorcycles @21%.

I agree with the sentiment you raise, that industry accounts for a very large portion of crude oil consumption, and that isn't going anywhere anytime soon. I just am unsure where you saw your data or if its perhaps looking at a different region specifically?

Sources for my figures: -total demand%: https://www.statista.com/statistics/307194/top-oil-consuming-sectors-worldwide/

-Transport sector breakdown: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/use-of-energy/transportation.php

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Calculate the difference in what it costs to maintain the highway system and what is brought in by the gas tax, and then charge that amount of money to every employer but offer them a tax credit that offsets this new tax if they can prove their Worker Works from home at least 90% of the time, and there will be Financial incentives for employees to report their employers for violating this rule

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

And they'll absolutely eat that cost while mandating "reTURN to OFficE oR else!" if the amount they'd lose in real estate is greater than the amount they'd be charged.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

yes, there are things congress could do to greatly improve the situation, but that takes time. and, ya know, congress not wasting all their time trying to expel and elect another speaker or trying to distract the country from the Trump show with their own Biden revenge impeachment and actually doing their jobs.

as a side note, tax rebates are not very helpful when people need to wait until the end of the year (or the middle of the next) for their savings. why not instant tax rebates/saving at the time of purchase?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I believe that’s happening in 2024

I had my state tax rebate immediately applied to my purchase this year (actually somewhat annoying because I found out too late to adjust my loan and would have preferred borrowing Less rather than getting part of my down payment back)

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The air in my area was so clean during that first month of covid. Traffic would also be a lot better for blue collar people if all the office workers weren't fighting them for road space.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

in NYC, New York Harbor and the East and Hudson Rivers got so clean that Humpback whales and dolphins came swimming up the rivers again for the first time in almost a century. it was awesome!

unfortunately, so did the sharks around Coney Island and Rockaway Beach, lmao

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Oil production will not stop until we have alternatives to other items oils helps produce. I.e. plastics, latex, etc.

Edit: all of you saying it comes from trees might want to check again. Synthetic rubber is used as it can prevent allergic reactions from the natural protein of the plant. Also synthetic rubber is used a little more than natural rubber.

link

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Latex is produced from rubber trees, not petroleum.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You might want to check again. Synthetic rubber is used a little more than natural rubber.

stats

[–] NewEnglandBlueberry@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

Synthetic rubber and latex are different things. Your sentiment isn't wrong, just that specific example.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

A huge chunk of plastics come from natural gas, not oil. Latex comes from a tree. As does natural rubber, which some tire manufacturers are returning to.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 9 months ago

PE, PP, PVC, polyacrylonitrile, butadiene rubber can come either from gas or oil, but oil can be more convenient. PS, nylons, PET, polycarbonates, epoxy resins, PMMA, phenolic resins require components derived from oil

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

this is a more specific extension of what i was talking about, but that amount of oil used for that dwarfs in comparison to the amount burned as fule and isn't nearly as destructive to the environment.

but you're not wrong.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Personal passenger EVs won't do much to dent global climate change. Gotta build mass transit and rail shipping, and clean up the electricity grid.

Carnival Cruises (63 ships) emits as much as 300,000,000 cars, and electricity generation and shipping are even more insane. All transportation combined is only 27% of our emissions. And EVs still need a lot of oil for tires and asphalt.

EVs are definitely better than ICE, especially for local air quality, but for global climate they're like deleting a text file to clear up hard drive space, instead of looking at the 400GB rip of LOTR.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No one single thing is gonna make the difference. It’s really the combination of everything together sustained overtime. I mean, you’re not wrong, but it’s really everything working together that’s gonna be the trick.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I agree. My bad I took your comment as that being the only thing we need to do. Apologies

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, no, it’s fine. I was just speaking within the context of why ramping up oil production in the US is important to the administration, for the sake of offsetting increasing costs from organizations, such as OPEC. If you recall, people in this country have been screaming about gas prices, and blaming Biden for it. Well, it shouldn’t be a surprise that he actually did something about it.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ah nah sorry I don't recall. I've intentionally cut myself off the news and most social media. It's made me happier but it can bite me in the ass, like in this thread 😅

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

oh, well, now you have some context. I hope it makes more sense to you now ;)

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is my argument for restricting supply enough to increase prices. Higher prices are incentive for every usage to find alternatives. Most of the alternatives do already exist but will never be adopted when fossil fuel solutions are cheaper

[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Yep. As much as individuals may care, and corporations may give lip service to the environment, large scale usage patterns are still dictated by economics.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

people may wish that oil production would suddenly just stop

Given the massive size of related industries and dependencies, “sudden” was never on the table. However we should be ramping down. The industry should already know that long term investments such as new pipelines will never pay off.

Gasoline/oil should be getting more expensive, or we’re doing it wrong. The best incentive to figuring out how to switch to options kinder to our environment, is higher prices with the promise of more increases. That doesn’t only apply to gasoline/oil, but heating oil, jet fuel, deisel for farming, construction and heavy trucks, marine deisel, plastics of all types, etc. Holding these prices low may help the economy in the short term but means we’re not going to switch to better choices and the impact will be more serious when it finally hits

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ten percent is still a nice chunk. Especially for just getting started. Add in hybrids to that, and it’s even better.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I’m not trying to impugn the progress made with EVs, I’m just saying that we’re not really there in terms of ending our dependence on oil as a fuel source.