this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
268 points (89.4% liked)

News

22839 readers
4055 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Can someone please tell me exactly what I'm supposed to be wearing?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

Adopt actual sheep, and just strap them to your body for warmth.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So generally the entire clothes industry is slavery ridden and completely fucked. Trying to follow the supply chain is basically impossible.

I would suggest essentially as little as possible for as long as possible, plant fibres probs good. synthetic not really that bad given the whole state of everything it's small fries in terms of plastic waste.

get local tailors to make clothing if you can afford it

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago (4 children)

get local tailors to make clothing if you can afford it

Anyone who can afford that is not doing it to be sustainable and humanitarian and I think you know that.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Wtf are you talking about? I'm not super rich, but i get some things done with a local tailor and one of the biggest reasons is to support local business and avoid overseas slave labour

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I look forward to Christmas every year so I can finally get new socks. You might not be super rich, but you're certainly not poor, either.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago

You really don't know what choices someone is making. If you replace clothing about once a decade and don't own much it's not very expensive.

High up front sure but maybe someone is eating cheap bean and rice based food, maybe they don't buy alcohol, maybe they don't own a car, maybe they buy used stuff rather than new whatever. There are loads of ways for many people to squirrel away the funds to get an item made here and there. Yeah obvs if you're destitute it's impossible and right now with economies going to shit way more people are losing money each week but prior there were choices people could usually make.

Yes it involves giving up other things and it can be stressful and difficult but that's expected. Slavery makes things cheap in dollars and high in human misery.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

"Some things." So not all of your clothes. In other words, you also can't afford to wear all cruelty-free clothing.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That really is a 'where you live' thing. When I lived in SEA I could buy a button down shirt you could wear to work for about $5, going to a tailor and having one bespoke was $6 in cotton, or $15 in silk. Wool was actually more expensive since there was no domestic production.

[–] matjoeman@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Does SEA mean Seattle or South East Asia?

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Sorry, southeast Asia

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Depends on where you live. In European cities it will be expensive to get new things tailored, but there will be shops only for changes and repairs, which will be cheaper, for example.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Yes, but we're talking about buying clothes, not getting them repaired.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That really depends. If you buy a tshirt it was probably made paying someone like 5c a day.

If you find someone who makes clothing, just a normal arse person not someone catering to the rich, they can probably make a basic tshirt to your rough size in about 3 hours or so. If they're paid a reasonable fee that's going to be in my country for example 200 aud or so factoring in material. A sweat shop T would be 20 to 50, or even 80 in a high end store so it's really not much more expensive.

Wear it till it has holes in it so say 5 to 10 years and it's really not that expensive.

More complicated clothing gets more expensive but a basic wardrobe is something like 3 Ts, 3 long sleave tops, 2 heavy pants, 2 light pants/skirts etc. you don't need to buy it all at once. Sometimes you need more clothes than that, e.g. you're a woman and you work customer facing but most people have waaaaay more clothes than they need.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

but a basic wardrobe is something like 3 Ts, 3 long sleave tops, 2 heavy pants, 2 light pants/skirts etc. you don’t need to buy it all at once.

No, you just have to do laundry more than once a week. Most people who don't have their own washer or dryer don't have time for that.

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What are you doing where you can't wear pants for a week or a top for 3 days?

Hard labour you don't wear new clothes you wear your old tattered stuff and hand me downs/second hand etc, or toughened workwear.

It sounds like you want to find a reason to do nothing rather than do what you can. Like if you want to avoid enslaving others and animal cruelty your lifestyle will have to change because your lifestyle is based on exploitation. If you don't want to change then get comfortable with slavery, idk what else to say.

Rather than shoot down things, why don't you say how much time you're willing to put into it and how much money? and what resources you have?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Nothing. On the other hand, wearing 3 shirts for more than 3 days makes people not want to come near you due to the stench.

Rather than shoot down things, why don’t you say how much time you’re willing to put into it and how much money? and what resources you have?

Ok. I'm unemployed, I have to spend my days helping my daughter with online schoolwork and I did buy new clothing this year because I've lost 60 pounds due to a still yet-to-be diagnosed illness where I haven't eaten any solid food since August and dropping down that many sizes is not fixable by just altering pants. Let alone underwear.

Any more personal info you'd like? My telephone number? My bank balance?

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No need to get snarky, you opened this convo by asking what you should wear and then just started lashing out. I am not responsible for your situation or the ludicrous injustice in the world, I am just trying to help.

I'm sorry you're in a tough sitch, if you're truly willing and able to do nothing then I have no idea why you asked. All I really say is wear second hand or get comfortable being a slaver, that's the choice we get atm.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

No need to get snarky, you opened this convo by asking what you should wear and then just started lashing out. I am not responsible for your situation or the ludicrous injustice in the world, I am just trying to help.

I never said you were. You asked, so I told you.

[–] bananaa@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Simplest answer: cotton. It’s cheap and good enough for most uses. High-grade cotton like Supima is extra comfortable and not much more expensive.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

It's not very good for the use of keeping you warm. Unlike wool.

[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately extremely high water usage to grow cotton, and a lot of it is grown in places that need that water for other things (RIP Aral Sea).

Based on the article we should use flax aka linen, which I suppose makes sense. Linen was once a finery due to the excessive effort needed to produce it, but now we have machinery.

[–] BagelEmbezzler@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Linen actually doesn't take to large scale mechanization very well. It causes the fibers to break into shorter pieces more often, which makes the final fabric rougher and less sturdy. Machine-woven linen also tends to be more loosely woven, which is again less sturdy.

Machines certainly helped some amount, but cotton got a way bigger boost from industrialization. That's why cotton is so much cheaper than linen today, especially high quality linen.

[–] 5200@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Nothing! Go forth and let it all be free and flap around!

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Reduce, reuse, recycle is the best bet. Most people in privileged areas own much more clothing than they need and dispose of it long before it's worn out. Used clothing, hand me downs. Recycled plastic fibres (wash in one of those bags that filter out micro plastic). Plant fibres. Hemp is a great alternative to wool.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm looking up hemp clothing now. It's just as expensive as the other option the other person gave me.

Purchasing used clothing, fine, but if your advice is to buy much more expensive clothing than I can afford, I guess I can't wear the cruelty-free stuff if I need something new. And I'm sure as hell not buying used underwear.

[–] speff@disc.0x-ia.moe 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Can't say anything about buying new clothes, but as the budget's tightened in my household I've been leaning how to mend my clothes. The ones I normally would've thrown away due to armpit/toe/crotch holes can be fixed somewhat easily.

One catch is that I use a sewing machine my MIL gave me - so there was some cost somewhere. But I see machines on craigslist going for sub 60 fairly often. The second catch is that I was lucky enough to develop an interest (and spend my free time) learning about how to mend clothes. If people lack free time/interest to learn how to do it, then they end up paying the new-clothes tax.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My wife does the sewing machine work here. I'm inept. But I'm okay with a needle and thread, so I've done plenty of my own (ugly) repairs. Some stuff it doesn't matter on anyway, like fixing the toe in a sock. Easy to do and saves money on socks.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

I've got a hole in my sock! Darn it!

[–] casmael@startrek.website 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Based on the news today, human skin™️ apparently

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

If we change the climate enough via global warming we can make it so it's always hot then we will no longer need clothes!

[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There are mulesing free certificates, and some companies go the extra mile.

Varusteleka is pretty open about their wool, but they don't have the biggest selection.

(varusteleka, I've called you out twice on this account, sponsor me lmao)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Are you fucking kidding me?

Do you think most people can buy clothes for that kind of money? I sure as fuck can't afford a shirt that costs $64 or pants that cost $160.

You're basically telling me that in order to have cruelty-free wool, I have to be wealthy.

[–] speff@disc.0x-ia.moe 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You’re basically telling me that in order to have cruelty-free wool, I have to be wealthy.

Congrats. You found out why there’s animal cruelty in the first place. People need cheaper things -> other things need to be sacrificed to make that happen.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (4 children)

That was my point. People who expect me to go cruelty-free think I can afford to.

[–] penguin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

Everyone can only do the best they can. Anyone who expects everyone to have zero impact is an idiot. Even a salad involved death and cruelty somewhere (animals caught in farm equipment, underpaid immigrant farmers who get abandoned if injured, etc).

So really, all you can do in your life if you care about these things is minimize your impact as much as you can based on what you know.

Similar to people who value giving to charity. Do they give all of their spare money to charity? No and no one should expect them to. Just giving anything to charity regularly has a positive impact and the whole "you're not doing enough" does much more damage than good.

Reminds me of vegetarians/vegans. I'm not really either, but I don't eat meat. And I'm just happy when I hear people say they want to eat less meat. Whereas most people who are against meat are only happy if someone else is also against it completely.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

A better approach is probably to focus on clothes that last, and keep them longer. Of course those are also more expensive but it should even out over the long run

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You could afford to, if companies were forced to go cruelty free. Clothing manufacturing is currently one of the most profitable industries, outpacing energy, fossil fuels, and technology industries while producing more new billionaires.

Do you really think that if they were forced to stop abusing animals, those companies would close shop and stop trying to sell textiles? That they would suddenly try to charge absurd prices for the same clothing you buy now?

Prices aren't set by costs, they are set by what the market will beat. Profits are the difference between costs and what the market will bear. Clothing companies charge exactly as much as they can to generate the sales volume they want, and nothing less. They want to sell you cheap clothes.

This applies to every industry. Nestle would find a way to sell chocolate even if they were forced to stop using child slave labor.

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago

Okay, and? What do you want us to do about it? Those companies are never willingly going to become cruelty free, and the government will never force them to while the ~~bribery~~, I mean, lobbying continues.

The only way these companies will go cruelty free is if people totally stop buying non-cruelty free products, which again won't happen because most people can't afford cruelty free products.

[–] speff@disc.0x-ia.moe 2 points 8 months ago

Got it. People on this site are ~~stupid~~ idealistic as hell, so it's probably good that I spelled out why these things are expensive. I wouldn't be surprised if some folks thought animal cruelty exists in these industries because people are mean.

[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That is correct.

Ethics come at a premium. Ethics are a luxury good.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But that was my point. I can't afford luxury goods. Most people can't. So we have no choice in wearing clothes made with cruelty.

[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

I agree with you wholeheartedly.

I buy very few clothes, so I save up to spend more on ones I think will last longer.

It's very burdensome when something doesn't last long enough to reach that price-equilibrium point compared to simply purchasing more, cheaper clothing.

I am currently almost out of socks and panties because of this :(

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 3 points 8 months ago

Yes, pretty much. You can't verify mass produced, fast fashion clothes. If you want something realisticly certifiable you need to look for high quality, low volume products. Or get a personal tailor and shoemaker.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 months ago

As little as possible.