this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
268 points (89.4% liked)

News

22869 readers
4216 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There are mulesing free certificates, and some companies go the extra mile.

Varusteleka is pretty open about their wool, but they don't have the biggest selection.

(varusteleka, I've called you out twice on this account, sponsor me lmao)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Are you fucking kidding me?

Do you think most people can buy clothes for that kind of money? I sure as fuck can't afford a shirt that costs $64 or pants that cost $160.

You're basically telling me that in order to have cruelty-free wool, I have to be wealthy.

[–] speff@disc.0x-ia.moe 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You’re basically telling me that in order to have cruelty-free wool, I have to be wealthy.

Congrats. You found out why there’s animal cruelty in the first place. People need cheaper things -> other things need to be sacrificed to make that happen.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

That was my point. People who expect me to go cruelty-free think I can afford to.

[–] penguin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

Everyone can only do the best they can. Anyone who expects everyone to have zero impact is an idiot. Even a salad involved death and cruelty somewhere (animals caught in farm equipment, underpaid immigrant farmers who get abandoned if injured, etc).

So really, all you can do in your life if you care about these things is minimize your impact as much as you can based on what you know.

Similar to people who value giving to charity. Do they give all of their spare money to charity? No and no one should expect them to. Just giving anything to charity regularly has a positive impact and the whole "you're not doing enough" does much more damage than good.

Reminds me of vegetarians/vegans. I'm not really either, but I don't eat meat. And I'm just happy when I hear people say they want to eat less meat. Whereas most people who are against meat are only happy if someone else is also against it completely.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A better approach is probably to focus on clothes that last, and keep them longer. Of course those are also more expensive but it should even out over the long run

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You could afford to, if companies were forced to go cruelty free. Clothing manufacturing is currently one of the most profitable industries, outpacing energy, fossil fuels, and technology industries while producing more new billionaires.

Do you really think that if they were forced to stop abusing animals, those companies would close shop and stop trying to sell textiles? That they would suddenly try to charge absurd prices for the same clothing you buy now?

Prices aren't set by costs, they are set by what the market will beat. Profits are the difference between costs and what the market will bear. Clothing companies charge exactly as much as they can to generate the sales volume they want, and nothing less. They want to sell you cheap clothes.

This applies to every industry. Nestle would find a way to sell chocolate even if they were forced to stop using child slave labor.

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

Okay, and? What do you want us to do about it? Those companies are never willingly going to become cruelty free, and the government will never force them to while the ~~bribery~~, I mean, lobbying continues.

The only way these companies will go cruelty free is if people totally stop buying non-cruelty free products, which again won't happen because most people can't afford cruelty free products.

[–] speff@disc.0x-ia.moe 2 points 9 months ago

Got it. People on this site are ~~stupid~~ idealistic as hell, so it's probably good that I spelled out why these things are expensive. I wouldn't be surprised if some folks thought animal cruelty exists in these industries because people are mean.

[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is correct.

Ethics come at a premium. Ethics are a luxury good.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But that was my point. I can't afford luxury goods. Most people can't. So we have no choice in wearing clothes made with cruelty.

[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

I agree with you wholeheartedly.

I buy very few clothes, so I save up to spend more on ones I think will last longer.

It's very burdensome when something doesn't last long enough to reach that price-equilibrium point compared to simply purchasing more, cheaper clothing.

I am currently almost out of socks and panties because of this :(

[–] ExLisper@linux.community 3 points 9 months ago

Yes, pretty much. You can't verify mass produced, fast fashion clothes. If you want something realisticly certifiable you need to look for high quality, low volume products. Or get a personal tailor and shoemaker.