1211

I think most all of us here on Lemmy are people with technical background. Most of my professional contacts remained using Reddit, Twitter and even excited when Threads launched.

If you are non-tech background, please comment and share what you do for life.

If you have tech background, upvote this to help promote this post so that we can find more non-tech users on Lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 288 points 11 months ago

Work on/build racecars. Some of it's very technical, but probably not the type you're asking about. Also a woman. I'm checking off all the abnormal demographics here. Right?

[-] techconsulnerd@programming.dev 85 points 11 months ago

We should normalize what you do. Woman can build racecars or do any other work a man can. Great work, keep it up!

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 48 points 11 months ago

@techconsulnerd I agree!!! It's been a very, very slow process, but I have been seeing more women in motorsports, which is awesome. Even F1 has a new series F1 Academy, which is an all women series. I'm way too old, but if I was younger, I'd sure be trying to get in.

[-] persolb@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago

Male prostitute

/s

(Seriously, agree with you in general though)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mrmanager 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

As long as high physical strength is not required, I strongly agree. These days the need for that is becoming less and less unless you want to be a marine.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 23 points 11 months ago

You're conflating physical strength with gender, but when it comes to who can do the work, only one of those is relevant.

I think we're on the same page, I'm just pointing out that the statement "women can do any work a man can, as long as high physical strength is not required" is just as inaccurate as saying "all men can do work that requires high physical strength". As a man, I'll be the first to say there are a huge number of women who are more physically capable than me. Turns out, a task that requires high physical strength doesn't need a man, it needs a person with high physical strength.

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

I don't think you were replying to me, but objectively the average man, of similar size, is going to be stronger than me, in the brute force, or explosive force aspect. It's just an unfortunate fact of human genetics. Men typically have denser bones, ligaments, and tendons, muscle fiber, more muscle mass, and testosterone to help build and maintain all of it. Women are said to be something like 60% as strong as a man on average. HOWEVER, women typically have better stamina, longevity, are better at enduring trauma, etc.

I am by no means frail or weak, and am probably stronger than a lot, but I will never be as strong, or as lean as a man with equal work put toward it.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 10 points 11 months ago

There is no disagreement that, in the current day and age of the human species, men are biologically predisposed to be more physically capable on average. There is no contention about that.

The point I am making is that two bodies with similar bone density, muscle mass, testosterone, etc. are going to be physically capable of the same thing, regardless of their genders. The gender is a red herring, what matters is the capability of doing the work.

As I told the other commenter,

We have a history of giving jobs to men because we’ve conflated their gender with other capabilities, not because they actually are the most capable. But my point is, we’re smart enough as a species to not do that anymore.

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

But my point is, we’re smart enough as a species to not do that anymore.

Lol. Are we? Maybe it's just my small world but I don't see that at all. I encounter sexism CONSTANTLY. Hell, scroll down to the bottom of the comments on my main reply, it's right there for everyone to see.

The point I am making is that two bodies with similar bone density, muscle mass, testosterone, etc. are going to be physically capable of the same thing, regardless of their genders.

But gender does matter because one gender is predisposed to be bigger, stronger, have more testosterone, and has the ability to be stronger/build muscle more easily. I'd love to agree with you, that in a perfect world, gender didn't matter in brute strength, but it does. All things are not equal out of the box.

Now, as I have clearly proven, brute strength isn't everything, in fact most of the time it only means so much, but it's still there regardless. I think a more accurate statement would be something like "strength only gets you so far, capability is more important"

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

Lol I meant it more in a "you're smart enough to stop leaving the milk out of the fridge, child!" kind of way. I agree sexism is still rampant, and I guess I'm implicitly saying people in the past are somehow excused because they weren't as intelligent, but what I'm intending to saying is that we're smart enough now, so we have no excuse.

one gender is predisposed to be bigger, stronger, have more testosterone, and has the ability to be stronger/build muscle more easily

I see this as a heuristic at best, and an excuse for sexism at worst. In my example above I'm specifically referring to two people who are equally physically capable of doing a task by definition. The man shouldn't be given preference simply because he's a man, and men happen to be stronger on average. That's not relevant when picking someone who can do the job.

[-] mrmanager 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sure but you are probably aware that all boys being born have higher strength than females, just because of biology. Then of course in life as we grow, some men don't maintain that strength and lose it. But I think it's still accurate to think that men in general are stronger than women, even if there are exceptions.

Otherwise we are just ignoring a fact of how our bodies are different.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago

But due to how natural selection works, that's a self-fulfilling argument. Men are biologically stronger specifically because people have made the argument you're making for hundreds of thousands of years, thereby selecting for the pattern you're claiming exists.

When you're looking for someone to do a task, you aren't looking for a biological explanation, you aren't looking for a man, you're looking for someone who can do the task.

[-] mrmanager 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't think people have selected for that. It was necessary in the past to be strong to survive and provide for your family. So those genes were selected because those people could survive long enough to have kids. If you were too weak, you didn't make it.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 7 points 11 months ago

I'm not saying it was deliberate (i.e. artificial) selection, the selection was natural. I'm just saying, think on it more.

It was necessary in the past to be strong to survive and provide for your family

But you're saying those genes weren't required by females for some reason? Why? Honestly the only answer is: because it just happened to work out that way. The evolutionary coin could have just as easily flipped the other way and resulted in women being biologically predisposed to be stronger. We see this in many animal species, in fact.

We have a history of giving jobs to men because we've conflated their gender with other capabilities, not because they actually are the most capable. But my point is, we're smart enough as a species to not do that anymore.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Gee, Mr. Manager, that's odd, I lift and carry my husband in and out of his wheelchair everyday because he's a quad and was a floppy baby who's never walked, but apparently "all boys being born have higher strength than females just because of biology."

You're sure it's ALL boys? You're absolutely sure that strength between two individuals is dependent upon their sex? We're the same age and height. I weigh more because he has no muscles and I do. And yet, SOMEHOW, I'm a woman.

Gee, ladies , why are we NOT surprised at that "boys"/"females" word choice in Mr. Manager's assertion?

I guess it didn't take long for the incels to follow the crowd over from Reddit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

Eh, it's still required to work on cars/engines. Thankfully we work on smaller vehicles (Mazda/Nissan mostly) and not some big ass diesel stuff.

I can "engineer" my way out of most situations, and have been very successful accomplishing things that many men can't, because they can't "think outside the box". What I mean by that is that I have to approach things differently. I have to understand things more completely sometimes, so I can work my way around the lack of brute force, where many men can just push/lift/torque something without thought, and they get complacent. That allows me to see different solutions to things that may stump others.

That said, I have found instances where I am just not physically big, or strong enough to do something, and need help.

I also have the benefit of being much smaller, so I can get into places a lot of men can't. It has its benefits and drawbacks.

[-] mrmanager 2 points 11 months ago

I believe you, and I have many examples from my own life where girls are outsmarting guys because they are forced to use their brains. Guys sometimes doesn't because we can just use strength instead, like you said.

And being smaller and more agile is a huge plus in most situations as well.

Pretty much agree 100%.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Man I'm so glad that zoomers understand the difference between sex and gender, and are doing away with this, "boys do this, and girls do that!" bullshit.

Like, oh yeah, do you know a lot of girls who are, in your mind, uncharacteristically smart? That right? That's not condescending in any way.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I think it's just more accurate to say that "there are things that only certain people with high physical strength can do." There's no reason to gender it.

[-] mrmanager 2 points 11 months ago

I disagree actually, but no offense to you personally. I think it's better to be specific and clear and say what we mean. It becomes ridiculous to say "some people" when we mean men most of the time.

Imagine trying to explain to a kid... He asks "are men stronger than females". You are supposed to say "no, some people are stronger than others" and leave it at that? The poor kid is growing up to be an idiot then, not knowing basic biology. Maybe I'm not understanding you correctly.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Fyi, just because you took a biology course 15 years ago, doesn't mean you have a firm grasp on the modern understanding of the subject. Sex and gender are two different things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cybermass@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

Yeah the only other abnormal demographic I can think of is being totally normal and well functioning mentally.

But I mean c'mon, this is an internet forum, we are all nuts here haha

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago

Haha, yeah I'm DEFINITLY not "normal" or "well functioning mentally".

[-] mrmanager 4 points 11 months ago

Don't you love the term "well adjusted" :)

Always makes me smile.

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

ha. I'm definitely not that either, but yes.

[-] Plaid_Kaleidoscope@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Def need an AMA. Or whatever we call it here. What kind of racing?

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 16 points 11 months ago

Can definitely do an AMA, but not sure how interesting it would be.

We have built multiple kinds. We have build engines/cars for Rolex GrandAm, Drifting (Formula D), Land Speed Racing (we actually hold a bunch of records in our class), King of Hammers/Baja type off-road (engines/wiring only, not chassis), and then the more casual type stuff for the weekend warrior types (autoX, desert toys, etc).

[-] Plaid_Kaleidoscope@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I'm super jealous. I live for motorsport so yeah, I'd be down to hear any cool stories! (No obligation, just curious)

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

It's not as glamourous as it seems lol. It's so much awful shit sometimes, but it's fun sometimes too.

I'll preface this story with here are some articles about a car we built (engine/wiring mostly), and took to Bonneville Salt Flats. (I'm not sure if links are allowed, so if not, LMK) If you want to read about it, there are about 15-20 pretty technical articles on Moto-IQ about the build (I'm co-owner of 5523 Motorsports, so articles with us apply). You can see them here (they don't seem to be in any particular order, and there's other unrelated shit, but they were publish chronologically originally and I suggest reading them chronologically). If the link doesn't get them to load, search project LSR on Moto-IQ site.

So, we were out at Bonneville, running the LSR 240SX which had our destroked SR20 in it. We get up to the line, start our pass, take off, and the car spins at right about 200mph (we never officially clocked 200 (lame), but datalogging shows we exceeded it). Next pass, same thing (I think it was a total of three times it spun that weekend). One of, if not the last pass we did of the weekend, we were in line in front of (maybe we were right behind, it's been a while) Danny Thompson (Mickey Thompson's son), who was running his dads Challenger II car (google the history, it's long, sad, and sorted). Our team was mostly at the start line, but I was at about mile 5.

Whichever order the cars went out in, I saw both from mile 5. Challenger II takes off, and I can't see it (curvature of the earth, I couldn't see it until it reach somewhere around mile 2) but the announcers are broadcasting on an AM channel so I can hear whatever they are calling out. I hear mile 1 xxx MPH, mile 2 xxx MPH, mile 3 xxx mph. I witnessed this car go 450.9 MPH on salt. I know that kinda sounds dumb, but you're brain really can't comprehend how fucking fast that is until you see it in person. I've been around cars, and fast car my whole life, but this was something else. Danny beat his dad's old record, which was the point, but my god that car was impressive.

So we go back out for our next pass, and what do we do, again? Spin, of course. There is the in car video of it in this article on page 3. The funny part, is that I have series of pics (which I'd have to go searching for now), where you can see the spring come off the chute, then the knob (the cable for the chute itself wrapped itself around the knob and launched it when it deployed), then the chute starts to deploy, and the last pic of the series was the nose of the car facing the fully deployed chute. We did set the record though. yay!

IDK how interesting that story is, but it was a fun weekend of racing. If you ever get the chance, going to the races out there is really fun. It still feels like back in the day, where everyone helps each other, and seemingly wants to collaborate, in some capacity. The crew next to us in the pits had a ranchero that they had put a Nissan engine in. It was an older Nissan engine (I don't remember it even having a true ECU in it) and they were struggling with the "tech" that was in it. IIRC it was just one of those MSD electronic ignition boxes (like the 6AL). We helped them as much as we could, and they lent us some tools. Hell, tech inspection, after we spun was some dude rubbing his hands around the circumference of the tires, to check for anything abnormal, and then the thumbs up to go again.

I will say the most flattering part of the whole weekend was these HUGE teams that were running these crazy cars really took notice of what we were doing with our little team/car. I didn't even have to be near the car, or mention it, and people would ask me about it. It's really something different from most other forms of racing anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treatyoself@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

You’re my hero. I always wanted to work on cars. I ended up in IT. I miss repairing shit back in my tech bench days. Using my hands to repair, build, make better. What kind of racecars?

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

We have built engines/cars for Land Speed Racing, Drifting (Forumla D, and lower classes), Rolex GrandAM, 24 hours of lemons (or similar series), more weekend warrior type stuff like AutoX or off-road toys, and engines/wiring for trucks that run in series like King of Hammers or Baja 500

[-] Treatyoself@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Can I be you when I grow up? (Am already in my 40s but that’s okay right?)

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

I mean, if you want to.....

[-] Plaid_Kaleidoscope@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

That's an amazing story! I've never been out west, but Bonneville would be awesome. Over 400 on salt sounds absolutely nuts.

Did you ever determine what was causing the spins? Aero or mechanical?

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Ok, the TL;DR is lack of aero, and weight, and we couldn't really fix it, and keep our class.

As I mentioned, we took an SR20 and destroked it to get it under 1500cc. We loving (sometimes) referred to is at the SR15VET or the 150SX. The class also limited aero. We were able to take some of the JDM body pieces off of the Type X Silvia, but we couldn't add any other aero components, and keep our class.

Our best guess, since it happened religiously at the same speed, was that it was an aero issue (mostly). Air would get under it, the car would get light and then spin. Land speed racing is counterintuitive to EVERYTHING you know about racing. Typically, you want a light as possible, and the biggest fattest tires, with relatively low tire pressure, amongst other things. You also typically want a linear power band, with progressive power over the whole range. Land speed racing is it's own beast. You want the skinniest tires you can get to work, and I swear, you overinflate them. You want the car to be heavy too. Our power band was also, basically, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing ALL OF IT. I can't find the dyno right now, but it really couldn't get out of it's own way, and then when like 6k rpm hit, and the turbo started to get happy there was a MASSIVE power/torque increase.

Some of the old timers came by our pit, in their golf cart, and started chatting with us. They seemed fascinated by our little import, and what we were doing. So they start asking questions. "How much does the car weigh?" "2800lb", or whatever it was. "bullshit, you need to add xxx more pounds" "what kind of tire pressure you running?" we reply "xxxpsi" "bullshit you need to be over 70psi". "did you add ballast?" "no....." "bullshit. you need to talk to xxx guy, he'll tell you where to get some cement" This was really our first foray into land speed racing, and it was definitely a learning experience.

Our next course of action was to add ballast, but the thing about land speed racing is that it takes place on "dry" lake beds (typically). Here is an iconic pic of Challenger II in 2014, when Speed Week got rained out (happens a lot). They had dragged the car all the way to Boneville only for the weekend to ultimately be cancelled. And they had to take pics of the car on the "salt" of course.

The year that we went out, and set the record (same year Challenger II did) a massive storm blew in over the mountain range, as our car was in tech, making sure we could make another pass, on our last day. Well, it was lingering over the mountain range, and heading for us. I've seen what that amount of water can do, and how fast it can do it, so we decided to get the pit packed up and head out, before we were submerged. There were EZ-Ups blowing away, shut flying everywhere, raining, windy, and salt was already getting more soggy (there is only a patch in the middle of the lake that's dry enough to drive on typically. The edges are usually still lake-ish. The day we arrived, I drove the "borrowed" SUV off the end of the road, and onto the salt, but I had to drive through water to get to the pits. The water was up to about the side skirts of a big chevy SUV. When we left the salt on the last day, the water was basically trying to come in the cabin, it was that high, at that point. The whole point of that is that we didn't have time to play with any changes, and the team captain and driver weren't able to continue with the car the following seasons, so it go mothballed.

@Plaid_Kaleidoscope

@techconsulnerd

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ohhh what kind of racecar? I'm actually going after work to the shop to go scale our car. Cross is a bit off keeps getting a little loose at the corner exit.

Also a woman btw

Edit, just saw your other comment were racing very different cars but that's awesome!

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Thanks! Yeah, we do all kinds of stuff.

[-] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago

I’m checking off all the abnormal demographics here.

Well, actually women doing extremely cool technical work are in perception more normal than women doing more usual technical work. =\

load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
1211 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

42432 readers
1492 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS