this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
1002 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2345 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TopKnot@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

A 14 year old working in what I assume is a restaurant seems weird to me, but if their parents agree, I can't see much harm in letting a youngster put a beer or a glass of scotch in front of the customer. Heck, at that age, I was stealing beer from my dad's supply. I think I turned out OK.

[–] GFHC406@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

In theory, maybe. But I think the bigger issue is that at 14, a kid doesn't have a real great ability to deal with drunk people, or is responsible enough to check IDs or any of the other things required to serve alcohol. Can you imagine a 14 year old in a TIPs training class?

Edit: and imagine how shitty a 14 year old girl would get treated serving booze to drunk assholes

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

Or how shitty a 14 y.o would feel if they over-served someone without realizing it, and felt responsible if something happened to them. Or could the 14 y.o still be criminally charged for over-serving.

None of it seems like the smartest idea

[–] Imotali@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

California here, at 14 I didn't quite yet grasp the "you can say no to people" thing yet. Definitely not the age you should be dealing with drunk men.

Sure, not all men.... but enough men that assuming all men is the safer bet.

[–] Fifteen_Two@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are putting children at risk of sexual harrassment from drunk adults. That is enough to say no for me lol.

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

That’s not a bug, that’s a feature.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That’s a libertarian approach, and I don’t necessarily disagree with that.

The problem is these are the same people pushing for book bans and criminalizing drag. They think those things are more likely to harm a kid than dealing with actual drunk adults as a job.

[–] jecxjo@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

I grew up in north east Wisconsin where we all got work permits and started worming at 13 at hotels and restaurants. It's a pretty common.