this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
895 points (98.1% liked)

politics

18933 readers
3517 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tilted@programming.dev 138 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Is this guy really the great new hope for the GOP? He seems to be a completely clueless buffoon who lacks any sense of decency. I guess it checks out.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There was fear on the left and hope on the right that DeSantis would be "smart Trump." Just as evil as Trump is, but with more brains to be able to pull stuff off and less likely to be distracted by petty rivalries.

Since then, DeSantis has shown that he's not as smart as people thought he was, definitely can't sway crowds like Trump can, and is absolutely willing to pursue petty rivalries even when they don't benefit him.

[–] norb@lem.norbz.org 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

definitely can’t sway crowds like Trump can

I think this is the biggest issue. He doesn't have the charisma that Trump does. While I've found most of Trump's nicknames for people pretty stupid, "Meatball Ron" is on point.

[–] Slwh47696@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't know what the fuck Trump has, but it's certainly not charisma. The guy can barely form a coherent thought when he's speaking, makes a fool out of himself every time he speaks, and is pretty much wrong about everything he says.

Still somehow has millions of people voting for him, so maybe it is some bizzaro reverse charisma or something.

[–] norb@lem.norbz.org 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

charisma

kə-rĭz′mə

noun

  • A rare personal quality attributed to leaders who arouse fervent popular devotion and enthusiasm.
  • Personal magnetism or charm.

Is he charming? Depends on preference I think. Does he "arouse fervent popular devotion and enthusiasm"? Absolutely. Why? Hard to say exactly (again, personal preference) but he fits the dictionary definition of "charismatic" to a T.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's charisma. Just because it doesn't appeal to you doesn't mean it's not charisma.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I would say that it's a form of charisma. One that works on his MAGA faithful but that doesn't work on the rest of us. (If anything, it's like anti-charisma to us.)

[–] Jinond_o_nicks@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Charisn'tma, is what I've taken to calling it.

[–] PsychedSy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

He's smart, just not in the way a populist politician needs to be. What he is, though, is a fucking ghoul. His service has some pretty fucked up shit regarding torture regimes at gitmo.

If you listen to him talk for 5 seconds you can tell he sounds like a dork. Trump will call his wife ugly and he's done.

[–] OverfedRaccoon@lemm.ee 65 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The good news is, Republicans aren't really about pursuing wokeness as much anymore. But polling also suggests they're much more in favor of Trump still, somehow, in spite of everything. So that's the other shoe dropping. They're back on their "law and order," unless the law and order is coming down on Trump, it seems. 😂

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“Law and order” has always only meant “keep undesirables (minorities, leftists, workers) afraid and under constant threat of violence”. It has never meant “actually hold everyone equally accountable to the law”.

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Important to note for the liberals: Yes, that includes when Clinton said it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

And when Biden wrote the 1994 Crime Bill.

(Sure, fine, Biden's more respectful of civil rights now as President. But that doesn't change what he did in the past.)

[–] onionbaggage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Light on the law... Heavy on the enforcement of Order (as they see it).

[–] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are other polls by Republicans that said wokeness is their top priority. I'm not sure what one poll does for this narrative. I'm not entirely convinced Republicans aren’t really about pursuing wokeness as much anymore.

I think DeSantis made have hurt that movement a little by being an incompetent moron.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I think trying to figure out their actual top priority is a fool's errand, because they have no idea. Seriously, I don't think today's Republican rank and file has a firm enough grasp on reality and the issues of today to have the first clue what they actually believe about anything beyond "Trump good" and "Democrats bad."

It's not even "Republicans good" anymore, because being solidly conservative, but disliking Trump, is enough to get one ousted from the party as a RINO now. The only true defining characteristic of a "Republican" today is worship of Trump.

[–] insomniac@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago

Just from my anecdotal experience with painfully stupid family members, it seems like the most important issue to them at any given moment is whatever the Facebook algorithm is pushing at the time. Whoever has that wrangled is really driving the narrative. They spend all their free time plugged in to Facebook seething over their perceived political enemies. Besides the fact that they’re stupid as shit, it’s pathetic and sad.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I upvoted you in a "well yes, but actually no" sort of way. Republicans know exactly what they want -- subjugation of everybody who's not them, using any and all means available -- but still don't feel secure enough in their power to come out say it that bluntly yet. So they come up with random shit to act as euphemistic proxies for it, which sounds like ineptitude to anybody who's still trying to give them some sort of benefit of the doubt.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair. Although I'd say that applies more to the mid-tier and up Republicans. The rank-and-file Fox News watchers don't know what they believe unless Fox told them five seconds ago.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, even the rank-and-file know they want to subjugate everybody outside their tribe. They may not necessarily understand how the things the leadership pushes accomplish that -- and more to the point, they might not even realize they're actually often not in the tribe the leaders are pushing it for -- but they don't need to because they have blind faith instead. Deference to authority is what being a conservative is.

[–] Sigh_Bafanada@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If somebody can debate their political viewpoints with me, that instantly earns them some respect points. I'm just tired of some people defining their political views as just being against other views

[–] JovialPrincess@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

I've attempted to discuss my political views to people, but it seems more often than not that as soon as I identify myself as conservative, I get shut down. This is despite the fact that more often than not, I vote democrat, support abortion, support legalized weed, want LGBT rights, a complete reorganization of the legal system, and an actual working social safety net. But I believe the federal government is too big, states should decide more for themselves and businesses and corporations are NOT people.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yep. When I encounter the rare Republican who can actually fully articulate a stance on an actual political issue, it's always a pleasant shock.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can the media please co-opt the term “law and order” and use it for all Trump indictment stories.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

The media is not going to undermine the billionaire class by helping to dilute its dogwhistles. The media is on the side of the billionaire class.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 year ago

He seems to be a completely clueless buffoon who lacks any sense of decency

That's basically their platform now.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think he got a big ego boost and has just made dumb move after dumb move since.

He tried to fight Disney. Like... How much cocaine do you need to be on to think you can win a legal battle against Disney.

Disney eats lawsuits for breakfast.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I hate both Disney and I hate DeSantis. And I hate frivolous lawsuits and useless fights for political points, but...

There is something inherently wrong with governments not being able to control megacorporations.

[–] TheDankHold@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Controlling actions that cause negative externalities for consumers and citizens I could see but this is about the government punishing them for publishing speech that opposes his agenda.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

On one hand full agreement, on the other hand there’s also something fundamentally wrong with state governments attempting to force mega corporations to do something in a different state without compelling reason purely by accounts of holding a large investment in their state.

Florida can ban things in Florida all they want within the confines of law and liberty (which they’ve long past left but that’s a different thing). But they were trying to force the whole of a company headquartered in California to stop being “woke” through punitive actions by nature of them holding a significant real investment in Florida that would be economically disastrous for both parties if it were sold off or abandoned.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It depends on what you mean by control. Can you state exactly what a Florida politician should have been legally allowed to do for the great crime of the CEO saying they disagree with them?

I have zero problems with regulations and taxes I have problems with a company or a person being censored for stating their opinion. If you look at everything he is doing it is all about them being broken to support him.

[–] TooManyGames@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

DeSantis vs Disney is like watching two kaiju monsters fight: both are monsters, but one is kinda fun since you've known then since childhood. But they're still monsters, so no matter who wins, it's a net good that they're fighting.

[–] ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You can remove the word “seems” from your comment. Meatball Ron is an absolute buffoon. He wants to spread his terrible hatred across the US as fast as possible, if he holds office. If there’s any doubt, look at some of the recent legislation being signed in Florida

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Ol puddin' fingers

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I don't think he's doing well even with the GOP, I doubt he's anyone's hope