food
Welcome to c/food!
The place for all kinds of food discussion: from photos of dishes you've made to recipes or even advice on how to eat healthier.
Animal liberation is essential to any leftist movement.
Image posts containing animal products must have nfsw tag and add a content warning (CW:Meat/Cheese/Egg) ,and try to post recipes easily adaptable for vegan.
Posts that contain animal products may receive informative comments regarding animal liberation, and users may disengage by telling a commenter that the original poster wants to, "disengage".
Off-topic, Toxic, inflammatory, aggressive debating, and meta (community rules, site rules, moderators,etc ) posts or comments will be removed.
Please be sure to read the Code of Conduct and remember we are all comrades here. Share all your delicious food secrets.
Ingredients of the week: Mushrooms,Cranberries, Brassica, Beetroot, Potatoes, Cabbage, Carrots, Nutritional Yeast, Miso, Buckwheat
Cuisine of the month:
view the rest of the comments
People using semantics to be pretentious is one of my biggest pet peeves.
The irony is that people think that this kind of pedantry makes them intelligent or, at the very least, someone with a neat, obscure fact up their sleeve, but being unable to understand basic and common uses of words because you're so hung up on what a textbook says is the exact opposite of intelligence.
"Vegetable," for the most part, is a culinary term, so bringing botany into the equation in a discussion about vegetables as food is just silliness.
And this is why pluto will always be my favorite planet
It's as much of a planet as the moon is made of cheese
Say no to anti-semantism on Hexbear.
Anti-semantic? But I condom hummus
Condom hummus sounds like something inmates would make in prison.
Sounds like something you'd need to see somebody to get a prescription cream to fix..
I call it water lemon, because that's how my cousin described it when she was 2 years old, and I thought it was so funny that I kept doing it and now I can't stop doing it send help.
The point of my comment had zero to do with believing that concerns about definitions are unreasonable. In some instances, especially when the meaning of a word is ambiguous, clarifying definitions is valid, obviously. My point is that pedantry over definitions like what this article is doing over "vegetable" as a botanical term is pointless and an embodiment of people who think eschewing colloquial usages makes them some degree of enlightened. It doesn't seem like you disagree with that. This kind of stuff misunderstands the nature of semantics, and that's my problem with it.
This article is about an interesting biological fact, I don't think its about being pedantic.