312

Ex-president calls Hopkins’ cannibalistic Lecter ‘late, great’ while condemning ‘people who are being released into our country’

Donald Trump on Saturday praised fictional serial killer Hannibal Lecter “as a wonderful man” before segueing into comments disparaging people who have immigrated into the US without permission.

The former president’s remarks to political rally-goers in Wildwood, New Jersey, as he challenges Joe Biden’s re-election in November were a not-so-subtle rhetorical bridge exalting Anthony Hopkins’ cannibalistic Lecter in Silence of the Lambs as “late [and] great” while simultaneously condemning “people who are being released into our country that we don’t want”.

Trump delivered his address to an estimated crowd of about 80,000 supporters under the shadow of the Great White roller coaster in a 1950s-kitsch seaside resort 90 miles (144.8km) south of Philadelphia.

The occasion served for Trump to renew his stated admiration for Lecter, as he’s done before, after the actor Mads Mikkleson – who previously portrayed Lecter in a television series – once described Trump as “a fresh wind for some people”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 157 points 1 month ago

The article didn't have the full quote, so here it is:

Silence of the Lambs. Has anyone ever seen The Silence of the Lambs? The late, great Hannibal Lecter is a wonderful man. He often times would have a friend for dinner. Remember the last scene? ‘Excuse me. I’m about to have a friend for dinner,’ as this poor doctor walked by. ‘I’m about to have a friend for dinner.’ But Hannibal Lecter. Congratulations. The late, great Hannibal Lecter. We have people who are being released into our country that we don’t want in our country, and they’re coming in totally unchecked, totally unvetted.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 116 points 1 month ago

I think reading that is giving me dementia...

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

The brain worms are having a feast again.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 month ago

It would be sad if an elderly family member started talking this way. The fact that a presidential nominee is talking like this, and yet the polls are close, is a bit mind boggling.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago

Oh god, they're becoming a Kennedy...

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 13 points 1 month ago

And they say dementia is not contagious…

[-] rainynight65@feddit.de 3 points 1 month ago

What's giving me dementia is the fact that so many Americans want this guy to be president. Again.

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago

I’m honestly baffled as to why a movie character would even come up in a political speech, much less this incoherently.

And yes, it’s a quote, it’s a funny line… why is he using it? It’s utterly silly. I’m also confused by the ‘late, great’ as if this was an actual person who had died, as opposed to a fictional character who hasn’t died in any book, movie or show I’m familiar with. And Anthony Hopkins is very much alive as well, as is writer Thomas Harris.

It doesn’t make any… goddamn… sense.

Please don’t elect this guy again.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Apparently this isn't the first time that he has related illegal immigrants to Hannibal. I'm not sure what he means by this - is he implying they're cannibals?

[-] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Heck, maybe he’s hoping Hannibal Lecter likes Mexican food, if you know what I mean.

God only knows what Trump’s thinking. Though he’s likely to be as confused as the rest of us mere mortals…

[-] triptrapper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Well as a native English speaker, I didn't see how he's relating the two at all. He's just saying two unrelated things one after the other, with no segue. It's just braindead.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe he's getting hungry while he's up there rambling and thinking he wants to eat them. Maybe someone told him about Swift's A Modest Proposal and he didn't realize it was satire, but maybe thought it was a good idea.

[-] NOPper@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

He was just watching the movie on the flight to the rally.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I'm thinking he's gone beyond RFK jr - he has brain worms and mercury poisoning. But also lead poisoning, possibly Adderall/cocaine abuse....

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

Wait is he advocating for the eating of immigrants?

Are these dependent or independent thoughts?

Also he does know Hannibal Lecter is fictional right?

And literally no person on the planet can give definitive answers.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 14 points 1 month ago

Also, does he understand the double meaning of "having a friend for dinner"?

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

If he didn't get the rest of it. No way he got that part.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is like early versions of LLMs hallucinating.

EDIT: I feel I need to apologize to LLMs for this comparison.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 32 points 1 month ago

Here's the video. In context, it doesn't make a whole lot more sense than what's in the article. Here's a story that goes into the other more coherent things he said which are actually a good bit worse.

[-] kwomp2@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

I don't know which one is actually worse.

A nostalgia themed glamourizing of brutality right next to "unwanted people". No explanation of how those two things connect, so all that stays is the association.

Kind of on a neuro-marketing like level of discours (just strenghtening your associations by creating emotions or atmosphere) he is mobilizing violence against immigrants. (And normalizing violence as a means of governing in general)

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

(And normalizing violence as a means of governing in general)

Yeah. I think as his dementia is getting more pronounced, his general admiration for people who kill you if you disagree with them is getting more explicit and weirdly specific and he's talking about it a lot more openly.

It's hard to tell even what the hell he means when he's talking about Hannibal Lecter. That's the only reason I say it's worse when he's talking about deporting protestors, because it's very clear what he means and it has more of a pathway to becoming reality. But I agree; my best guess when he talks about Hannibal Lecter and Al Capone is simply that he's playing it straight -- he admires someone who can casually talk about murdering other people, and aspires to be like that, because that means strength.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Does he... Does he just not know what referring to someone as "the late, great whatever" means? Does he just like the sound of the rhyme?

How do people in his audience come away from rallies like this one and go, "Yep, that's the guy who should be president"? Are they as brain-damaged as him?

[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Well apparently a lot of people didn't come to hear what he said, they left during the speech...

https://twitter.com/aliyareports/status/1789435508822561181

[-] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Never been to any political rally or event, but do people actually stay during the whole thing usually? People leave early during baseball games to beat the traffic, even if they like baseball or the match.

[-] lettruthout@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I've only been to one that was big. It seemed like most people were still in the venue at the end, and it was slow going on way getting out.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 23 points 1 month ago

This is the nuclear speech all over again.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 month ago

No this is somehow weirder. He seems to be confusing movies and real people, and possibly thinking it’s still the 1980s, when silence is the lambs was popular.

Like mid stage Alzheimer’s dementia.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

You know, usually if I try hard I can kinda figure out how his rambling stream of consciousness verbal diarrhea got from one point to another. This is just...nonsense.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He's trying to say that the people coming into the country are dangerous criminals, but he's done the talking points so often by now that neither he nor his audience need the connective tissue between the ideas.

"Oh, now he's doing the Hannibal Lecter bit? Yeah, screw illegals or whatever."

They have their own coded language at this point where as Trump slips more and more into dementia they still understand what their adoptive hate spewing neo-Nazi grandpa dictator is talking about.

"And then the blargabaghehhhh...."

"Exactly. Fuck the blargabaghehhhh...."

Edit: I don't think I'll ever stop laughing when I see that clip, btw.

[-] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

That seemed more like a drug orgasm then a brain fart

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

This is like when a band that has been doing a song for decades plays about thirty seconds of it and some of the best lyrics...a magamedley.

[-] criitz@reddthat.com 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He must've just watched Silence of the Lambs on cable the night before. He always works the last thing he saw on TV into his speeches.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago
this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
312 points (95.6% liked)

politics

18059 readers
2666 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS