this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
99 points (87.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

So, in other words, you want the Palestinians to just die, huh? I'm impressed. Not only are you throwing vulnerable Americans under the bus, but also those protesting Israel's actions, and the Palestinians themselves.

Be honest with yourself. You don't give a damn about the Palestinians or any brown people. You just want to use them to score political points. And as a brown person myself, I find that utterly despicable.

Source:

https://wapo.st/3wSKnDY

Trump told donors he will crush pro-Palestinian protests, deport demonstrators

Trump has waffled on whether the Israel-Gaza war should end. But speaking to wealthy donors behind closed doors, he said that he supports Israel’s right to continue “its war on terror.”

"Israel, Trump argued, needs his help. Street demonstrations for Israel get smaller crowds than his rallies, he said."

[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

So, in other words, you want the Palestinians to just die, huh?

No, I don't. Biden isn't doing anything to stop it anyway. I want something to vote FOR rather than just voting against something I don't want. Biden is not earning my vote right now.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Trying to prevent more Palestinians from dying isn't something to vote for?

Look, I understand what you're saying. It would feel a lot better to vote for a candidate instead of voting against another one. But we don't have that luxury right now. We need to beat back the regressive rot first and foremost.

[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

We cannot make progress while still so many accept the situation. This system will not allow change while the electoral college still exists. We need ranked choice voting and popular vote. Voting for Biden did not prevent Palestinians from dying, clearly. I'll never forget that we could have had Bernie Sanders as president, and we missed that opportunity due to greed.

[–] juicy -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you vote like the Arabic community, you're throwing them under the bus?

Slate went to Dearborn, MI:

“If it came down to Trump and Joe Biden, I will vote for Trump. Because it doesn’t get worse than Joe Biden,” a man named Salah told me. His friend, Amad, added, “Biden was supposed to be the peacemaker. The comfort-maker. Instead, he became accessory to the biggest genocide in modern history.”

...

“Imagine thinking it’s a good argument to say to a community that has lost 30,000 people, ‘Watch out for the guy that’s going to ban you.’ You’re really asking me whether I’m going to take a ban or a genocide? I’ll take a ban,” Zahr told me.

“I mean, we’ve literally seen our families and our people being thrown into mass graves. Babies blown to bits. It’s not some far-off thing to us,” he said. “It’s been a struggle to declare our own humanity while mourning for our people being massacred.”

...

The truth is Ahmed was one of the only Arabs I could find in Dearborn who openly admitted they actually planned to vote for Biden in November.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps you should try to furnish actual data instead of meaningless anecdotes. Don't give me a handful of people and pretend they represent everyone.

It should also be noted that Arabs are not a monolith. Several Arab countries refuse to take Palestinian refugees, and are even on friendly terms with Israel. They opened their airspaces to allow the Iranian attack to be intercepted, and Jordan even helped intercept some.

[–] juicy 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

My on the ground reporting beats your nothing. But here's some data for you. The Arab American Anti-Discrimination Committee and the Truth Project asked 36,139 Arab Americans and “allied voters” "Who are you voting for in November?" 2,196 people responded. Here are the results:

2% Trump

7% Biden

25% Jill Stein

20% Cornell West

19% Undecided

23% Uncommitted

3% Stay home

A poll published at the end of October 2023 found "only 17% of Arab American voters saying they will vote for Biden in 2024—a staggering drop from 59% in 2020."

Then a couple weeks ago a NYT poll "found Trump leading among registered Middle Eastern, North African or Muslim voters in the swing states, with 57 percent saying they were planning to back him in November. Only 25 percent said they were supporting Biden."

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Have an upvote for bringing receipts. It's noteworthy that the NYT poll mentions this however:

"However, Biden still held a lead over those voters who participated in the 2020 election, winning them 56 to 35 percent."

Regardless, I do concede your point. I'm interested in seeing how polls develop as we get closer to the election and the conflict continues. If Trump continues to open his mouth and express even deeper support for Israel and persecuting pro Palestinian protestors, the numbers may shift dramatically.

I hope that they do, at least.

[–] juicy 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think things could change pretty quickly if a ceasefire is reached, and reached before another 35,000 people die. If this is still going on when the fall semester begins, it's going to be ugly.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A ceasefire is crucial. The only one who's against one from what I can tell is Netanyahu. The war isn't really doing anything, and I believe IDF commanders have said as much. The Israeli government has elements that believe they need to outright leave Gaza and just make sure there's a new governing body there that isn't Hamas. The Israeli people seem very pissed about the hostages still being hostage as well.

Combined with US pressure, I think we will see a ceasefire that looks to get the hostages returned and the violence to stop. Pressure is continuously building in that direction, and Netanyahu is obliviously making it more and more likely.

Let's hope there's a ceasefire and the beginning of aid and rebuilding. I think everyone left of center wants this to be over.

I appreciate the discussion we've had, and I'm sorry for being rude to you earlier.

[–] juicy 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I certainly hope you're right.

No worries! I get the frustration.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

You're a good person, thanks :)