Man it's amazing to see how fast they can set aside their differences to pass things that are universally terrible. Really makes you believe in the institutions
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
61 points (90.7% liked)
politics
19097 readers
2927 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If calling Israel racist makes me an antisemite, than I'm a proud antisemitic Jew.
All this has done is cause harm to Jewish people by devaluing the meaning of the word.
Yes, this. I remember Cenk saying this multiple times in recent weeks/months and I think he's right (as are you). The actions of Israel are going to do more harm long-term to Jews everywhere as well as the short-term harm to Palestinians they are carrying out right now. It just adds more fuel to the fire and more ammo for those trying to whip up actual antisemitic hate...
Extra irony points that the same people that make apologies for the "Jews will not replace us" bunch are the same ones that have undying support for Israel, no matter what Israel does. Often cynically so because of their eschatological fantasies about Israel...
Exactly. People, all people, hate being labeled something they aren't. By calling everything that isn't 100% Pro-Israeli Genocide "Anti-Semitic", you get people who have positive to neutral feelings about Jews slowly get more and more angry with the term and actually cause the antisemitism.
There was a similar backlash in the US against gay/trans people. And black people. And everything. When you adopt a policy of 100% for or against, binary only, you leave your 99% ally behind along with your 0%-support enemy.
The definition includes denying Jewish people their right to self-determination by claiming that the State of Israel is a racist state and drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
America is the land of the fucked. Israel is a racist state committing genocide against a peoples just like the Nazis did.
The idea that a state is required for self determination means Israel is an apartheid state by keeping Palestine an open air prison.
Jfc are we really this beholden to the state of Israel? Are we really Israel's bitch?
What the fuck is wrong with our elected representatives, grow a goddamn pair. Israel cannot dictate American domestic policy. Freedom of speech... fuck.
It is extremely cheap and easy to purchase politicians in the U.S. Neoliberals (like Biden) and conservatives like Bitch McConnell have accepted money from Jewish funds like AIPAC for decades.
Unless they are progressives, you should assume every politician you see is purchased.
Israel DOESN'T dictate American domestic policy, evangelical Christians do. They believe that the existence of the state of Israel is a necessary step to bring about the Second Coming of Jesus, so they're all in and absolutely nothing can sway them.
An all-powerful, omniscient creator of literally spacetime itself, and he needs an anthill--one that is, on his scale, far smaller than a subatomic particle--to defend his honor against other anthills within the same infinitesimally small particle and to keep defending their anthill by some arbitrary and tiny point in this spacetime so they can have an everlasting party together outside of his pet spacetime, of which that anthill is, itself, constituted.
Military industrial complex says hello.
Democrats support this bill. Joe Biden supports this bill.
Democrats (with the exception of the progressives) are as into genocide as Republicans.
Does Biden support it? I haven't seen any evidence he plans on signing it (or anything to the contrary, either)
Several Democrats and Republicans have indicated they'd vote against it but is it reasonable to expect it will get through the Senate?
Ken Stern, the person who wrote the definition adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, testified against a basically identical version of the bill in a previous Congress. He basically said it was meant to help governments collect data on antisemitism and was never intended to be enshrined in law since some of the examples in the definition aren’t automatically antisemitism. He was concerned making the Dept. of Education use it would chill legitimate speech on college campuses.
Unfortunately, chilling legitimate speech on college campuses is the true goal of the bill so here we are.
...and just how do these assholes define "antisemitism", I wonder? {reads}
Oh, of course. JFC. They are the most cynical bunch of jerkoffs....
Albert Einstein would be pissed off and tell the House to go to hell.