this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
846 points (97.7% liked)

Atheist Memes

5589 readers
302 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 66 points 6 months ago (4 children)

My grandma used to work at a Catholic charity to distribute food for people without resources.

There were a few Muslims who requested food from there, and they always complained that the meat wasn't halal. Their very Catholic response was that they treated everyone the same, and weren't going to change the food they offered just because some Muslims were complaining.

Then again, quite very Catholicly, they didn't offer any meat during Lent to anyone.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you are getting help from someone you shouldn't complain about their preferences.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 months ago

In my country they don't pay property taxes, and often use charity as a justification. So it's debatable if their help with strings attached is a net positive.

Give me your wallet and I'll buy you an acceptable dinner with it.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

I just treat that shit like an allergy.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't get your point. They give food away for free and they choose what and when. What's wrong with that, exactly? That their choices correlate with their religion? Well, duh.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The story is illustrative of the failure of private charities as public institutions.

We've got two sets of dietary restrictions, one of which the Catholics disregard and the other they faithfully apply. This makes their charity functionally inaccessible to the chunk of their neighborhood that's Muslim.

This recalls another common instance in church charities, wherein recipients are pressured into prayer before receiving aid. As many of these charities - particularly in the wake of the Bush 43 era "Faith Based Initiatives" charity privatization initiative - obtain their aid from the federal government, what you have is secular aid filtered through sectarian institutions as a means of cultivating particular ideological views.

What’s wrong with that, exactly?

Set aside the generic legalist "Seperation of Church and State" 1st amendment guidelines, wherein residents aren't obligated to hold religious views in order to access government services.

The fundamental problem with a state sponsored religious charity is that it polarizes the community into economic haves and have-nots, based on religious beliefs. And that foments discord, bigotry, and ultimately violence.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

For the record, the charity I was talking about does also receive funding from the government, due to the religious institutions pressure through their media and their own preachers, so these criticisms are also appropriate for that situation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

This reminds me of the term "rice christians." When Christian missionaries would go abroad and offer aid to people only if they converted.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They're imposing their customs based on dogma on vulnerable people with little to no capacity to choose, with no larger basis than "it's what I was indoctrinated to believe". It's doubly shameful because this is a country that has been trying to unshackle itself from the legacy of a Fascist Catholic dictatorship, the Inquisition, and the forced expulsion/conversion of Jews and Muslims.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Halal/kosher is basically a "farm to table" supply chain requirement. Especially if you're relying on donations it wouldn't be simple to source. I wouldn't expect any charity really to refuse supplies or try to source a 'duplicate' set of supplies for a minority of the people they serve. If they were in a Muslim majority area it would make sense to go to the effort.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The donations they took was money. They bought the food directly from the supermarket, which does have halal items here.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Ah.

Yeah that's kind of a dick move.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Like I get not providing food you disapprove of. Food Not Bombs is supposed to be vegan food, but also when helping people, make reasonable accommodations to ensure you’re meeting needs they have. Haram meat given to a Muslim is useless, you’re better off giving that meat to someone else. No matter how many cheeseburgers you give a vegan, you won’t fill their stomach.

In fact this is one of the issues with charity as a concept. Many who do it expect gratitude for whatever they give and see requests for something that would help better or to stop giving things that will only go to waste as being a choosy beggar. When aiding people you need to ask them what they need, otherwise any help you provide is accidental.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Which religion said I can’t have sex with an ice cream cone in a park?

Because that cops was an asshole.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The Bible even says it's better for a man to put his seed in an ice cream cone than it is to let it fall to the ground. Though they may have just been talking about the ice cream cone. 🤔

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What’s funny is that’s not why god smoked the jackass.

He just didn’t want to give his brother an heir. For the record his brother was such a massive jackass that even the abrahamic god couldn’t stand him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

"my religion forbids me from talking to someone who has ice cream unless i also have ice cream, so shut your fucking mouth."

[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I do have an amount of pity for people with extreme religious views. I remember talking to an atheist friends extremely religious mother who was trying to come to to terms with the fact her daughter was going to go to hell one day.

Imagine walking through the park and seeing someone about to eat an ice cream that you know has a powerful psychoactive substance in that will kick in after few years that tricks the persons brain into believing they're being tortured until their brain turns to mush.

I absolutely don't agree with people spreading their religious doctrine, especially when unwelcome, but many of those people could be considered victims to that choice and don't deserve to be antagonised.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That's all well and good, but now this guy is calling the cops on you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

WHY ARENT YOU BEING TOLERANT?

/s

[–] Huschke@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I get the sentiment, but if you eat ice cream on Mondays you are just evil. Ice cream clearly is a Tuesday treat. /s

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Excuse me heathen? It's literally Taco Tuesday it's in the name!

:P

[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I see your argument and raise you choco tacos

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago

I've been living a lie!

Now that is a taco Tuesday I can get behind. Tacos for dinner, tacos for dessert!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why is Al Sharpton telling people not to eat ice cream?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Fuck Al Sharpton.

Sincerely, every Transy Student that attended his talk on our campus in 1998 where he accused us of being UK, for 45 minutes straight.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Whatever religion he's in, he's probably the only member.

🍦 🍨

[–] StaySquaredUp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Uhm... nope.

To your religion is yours, to my religion is mine.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There were Muslim fundies in my area who shouted at participants in an lgbt parade.

That being said, if only what you say is that easy then we would not have had wars in the name of religion.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago

Do you live in the real world?

load more comments
view more: next ›