this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
137 points (100.0% liked)

news

23446 readers
570 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nawaf Salam, the head of the International Court of Justice: “Israel must immediately hold its military offensive of any other action in the Rafah governorate which may inflict on the Palestinian group in Gaza, conditions of life that could bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedWizard@hexbear.net 72 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Without these orders being backed by some form of material threat, they're the equivalent of finger wagging. It's good for documentation and building a paper trail for the inevitable trials that will result, but you just wish there was a way for these orders to have some weight behind them.

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 35 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The main use for these decisions right now is to hold libs' feet to the fire. Oh, you're Mr. Rules Based International Order? You think we're the good guys? You think this is a complicated, messy situation but whaddayagonna do? Here's an objective, prestigious international observer saying it's genocide.

Short of anything really cool happening, this is going to end the way apartheid South Africa ended: gradual economic and political isolation plus on-the-ground resistance resulting in some version of the Israeli government deciding the current course is untenable.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Will the US let the Isntreali government decide that though? The whitehouse seems to be extremely vociferous in its backing of israel, way more than apartheid South Africa.

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

the US' current blank cheque support can't rescue the zionist project, what further escalation is left?

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Openly sending US troops in? Crashing Ospreys but in Isntreal?

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

the IOF can't coordinate not shooting their own guys, the US isn't going to put their troops in that line of fire, and if they did they'd be pretty useless

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You think they won't do it anyway though? If there were no Israel, America would have to invent one?

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

cant invent things twice. Syria and Iraq are examples of what a US effort 'from scratch' looks like, and US power has only declined since

[–] Pentacat@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Putting pro-Palestine young people in the US into work camps to revitalize our “defense” industry? Seizing those same people’s assets (and their parents’ assets) to recruit fresh settlers with extra financial rewards?

These steps aren’t materially more helpful than today’s blank check but they would send a powerful message of unwavering commitment to the Zionist colony.

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 5 points 4 months ago

i think you'd need to send prisoners as the colonists Australia-style. Israel is bleeding settlers and i don't think they'll be more disposed as Israel becomes even more of a pariah and its conditions decline.

[–] Beaver@hexbear.net 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In the early Obama era, the lib argument for how this is "supposed" to work is that the UN would identify nation-state level crimes about to happen (or in-progress), and then send a coalition national militaries over there to solve the problem. They based this on such positive examples as UN and NATO interventions in Yugoslavia and Afghanistan.

[–] zed_proclaimer@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

Don’t forget Korea!

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago

for the inevitable trials that will result

The UN will want another International Tribunal for this but the mechanism to call one is performed via a security council vote. What they have to do first is make it so politically costly that the US won't veto it.

An International Tribunal called by the security council has binding powers above that of the Security Council itself. Effectively once called an international tribunal can ultimately bind the security council to act on its decisions.

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I honestly don't know enough about the level of standard of the ICJ's other findings. Do we really want them to have a global cop force to back up their threats?

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

I mean fuck it, why not. Any court on the level of a constitutional court or the ICJ with no standing army is always going to be finger wagging

There's a debate to be had about the existence of these types of courts in the first place but if you actually believed in them you'd be pro them having a standing army

[–] CommunistBear@hexbear.net 44 points 4 months ago (2 children)

conditions of life that could bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

Is this not a roundabout way of calling it genocide?

[–] imikoy@hexbear.net 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's legalese, laywers have to do this, or the message's recipient will bog everything down arguing about semantics.

[–] Black_Mald_Futures@hexbear.net 32 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

ofc the ICJ is anti-semantic when it comes to Israel🙄🙄🙄

[–] Zrc@hexbear.net 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

go ahead westoids, call the ICJ antisemitic, say they're Hamas what-the-hell

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

God I've been meaning to post about this:

In a now deleted tweet the "Jüdische Rundschau", which prides itself as being the only independent jewish newspaper in germany, accused the ICJ of being a soros founded plot against israel, citing an author from the Kopp Verlag, a right wing conspiracy publisher

The mission statement of the paper is "to counter an often distorted and incomplete media picture of Israel"

It's also not the only jewish newspaper in germany, because there's the Jüdische Allgemeine, which is published by The Central Committe of Jews in Germany and is more liberal lol

[–] Zodiark@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago

Israel responded to this by immediately bombing Rafah.

[–] porcupine@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 4 months ago

It's wild to me that people seem to believe that any UN body is more likely to materially intervene against the empire rather than the UN just dissolving like the league of nations to be replaced with a more explicitly international-community-1international-community-2 org representing the Rules Based International Order.

Three fifths of the permanent UN security council members are committed to destroying and (re)colonizing the other two fifths, and have no reservations about doing a nuclear first strike to make that happen.

[–] Mickmacduffin@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago

How come none of the rest of us thought to order Israel to halt? We could've ended this months ago