this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
111 points (88.8% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2644 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Taiwan's customs officials have issued a fine of NT$200,000 ($9,369) to a traveller for attempting to bring a lunch box containing pork into the country.

The Indonesian national had arrived from Hong Kong on April 30 when a quarantine dog sniffed out the "roast chicken and pork combo", said the Taiwanese Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency. 

The traveller was reportedly unable to pay the fine and deported.

Taiwan introduced fines of NT$200,000 for bringing pork products to the island from countries affected by African swine fever (ASF) following an outbreak in China in 2018.

Fines increase to NT$1 million for subsequent breaches of quarantine.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 162 points 5 months ago (2 children)

A better headline:

"Visitor to Taiwan attempts to break biosecurity law and is hit with a fine"

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I mean, that headline implies intentionality, no? I doubt the guy knew that his lunch would get him slapped with a $10k fine.

I know I don't Google every single item in my bag to make sure that something like the type of cotton my socks are made of doesn't get me thrown in jail.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 40 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Anywhere with a biosecurity law has signs posted in the most popular languages. And they'll usually tell you not to bring food or animal products into the country in any form. And there are convenient trash cans in case you did bring something you need to get rid of before you hit customs.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The guy was from Indonesia and routed to Taiwan via Hong Kong. There's a good chance there were no signs or announcements in a language he could understand.

[–] Tryptaminev@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Do you think he traveled to Taiwan without being able to speak any English or any Mandarin? Also there is a very solid chance that his flight company informed him of the rules as he was booking the flight. Also there is stuff like pictograms. Also Indonesia is majority Muslim country, so being part of a pork eating minority further increases the likeliness of being able to speak at least some other language.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I've been conditioned by companies too disregard all signs as they are 99% of the time only there to sell garbage and distract me..

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 13 points 5 months ago

Turning that instinct off when going through security screening, customs, or biosecurity is usually a good idea.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He wasn’t jailed though. He was sent home.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I mean, I don't know that that changes my point at all, but if you'd really like me to rephrase it:

I don't Google every item in my suitcase to make sure the the type of cotton my socks are made of won't get me immediately deported and fined $10,000 that I don't have.

[–] blargerer@kbin.social 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you travel internationally you really should scan a checklist for banned products. Especially around food and produce if you intend to bring any, there is always something on there.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I googled what not to bring into Taiwan, and this was the first link that came up: https://support.carousell.com/hc/en-us/articles/115008674167-List-of-Prohibited-Content-Taiwan

I can see pursuing that and not putting together that your lunch violates it. It has a big red text about animal product imports, but specifies that it's about animals under quarantine, which makes it seem like more of a livestock restriction. Especially when it starts referencing legal codes instead of giving you any kind of meaningful explanation.

Combine that with the fact that the dude was Indonesian and routed through a Hong Kong airport, and I think it's not wildly unreasonable that he would have missed the memo, even if he'd done his due diligence.

And I stand by that, even if he'd not done his due diligence, the punishment is excessive. This feels like more of a "we confiscate the offending material, slap you with a $500 fine, and send you on your way."

It's not like he was smuggling in livestock. He had the equivalent of a carnitas burrito from Chipotle in his bag.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I was I clined to agree with you until I got to section 5.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Fair. I'll admit, I did start skimming at some point and you're right, it's pretty explicit in section 5 and I just didn't see it.

It's a wall of text though for sure. I probably would have skimmed it in the same way if I was looking to travel there, lol. Which is on me for sure, but I also wouldn't expect the penalty for skimming the list and missing something to be ten grand out of my pocket, lol.

[–] Kanzar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

A chick got pulled for Subway: https://www.smh.com.au/traveller/inspiration/forgotten-subway-sandwich-costs-australian-traveller-jessical-lee-2664-on-arrival-home-20220721-h2576l.html

So it's not surprising to me for being hauled up over a lunch... I'm likely biased as Australia and NZ have long been very strict about biosecurity.

What does seem strange to me is that in Australia, if I bring in something they don't like, they turf it and let me through?? No fine or anything. Admittedly I go through the "Declare" line, and am open about what I'm unsure about.

[–] elmicha@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

I don't know how you ended up on a page for a Taiwanese marketplace and didn't realise it.

But on the other hand the official customs page doesn't have anything about animal products.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He tried to bring something in that he (maybe) didn’t know he wasn’t supposed to, got fined? Couldn’t pay it so he got refused entry and sent home.

This is normal behavior at entry points… and should probably serve to make you go “gee I need to check that” before flying to another country.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Check what though, that's the issue. I would never think that my carnitas burrito from Chipotle might catch me a 10k fine.

And let's be real, there's no reason to put that "(maybe)" in there. Are you suggesting the dude was like, "Ahahaha, my dastardly plan is in motion! I'm going to snuggle 4oz of pork hidden away in my lunch, in direct violation of import controls. It's so clever because I have absolutely no discernable reason I would want to do this on purpose!!!"

And what are you recommending me check? Google every item on the "ingredients" list on my coke zero to make sure I'm not smuggling red dye number 33 into a country that bans it?

Most civilized countries don't fine people $10k for breaking laws that it would be very reasonable they have no idea exist.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And let's be real, there's no reason to put that "(maybe)" in there. Are you suggesting the dude was like, "Ahahaha, my dastardly plan is in motion! I'm going to snuggle 4oz of pork hidden away in my lunch, in direct violation of import controls. It's so clever because I have absolutely no discernable reason I would want to do this on purpose!!!"

No.

I’m saying he might have known that pork was banned and didn’t think it was that big of a deal. that happens all the time.

Except it’s actually a really big deal. The ban on pork, specifically, is to prevent ASF from entering the local herd.

Bio controls are one of the few ways to prevent spread; and it takes all of five minutes to check what is or isn’t banned.

Further more he could have declared it- “hey I have this pork lunch,” which would have led to a very different conversation.

And what are you recommending me check? Google every item on the "ingredients" list on my coke zero to make sure I'm not smuggling red dye number 33 into a country that bans it?

It was literally called “chicken and pork combo.” Not exactly hidden.

You don’t have to google anything- except maybe to find their customs website where it’s all very plainly stated.

There are a dozen travel advisory warnings about pork products, specifically, and clearly stating that all pork is barred from entry.

More generally, meat and dairy products are almost always barred from entry (along with most every kind of ag product in general.)

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can't find the pork ban on the link you provided. The closest I saw was "Quarantine inspection of animals, plants and their derived products" which isn't a prohibition of anything in particular, and the link to the relevant authority literally goes to a dead page.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

If you were able to find the quarantine inspection the. You probably found the Items subject to other laws

That literally says all live animals and product s from them are banned (with a few exceptions that wouldn’t apply.)

You don’t get to not spend five minutes checking customs before traveling to another country and pretend like you’re the victim for getting dinged.

Particularly since the customs agent is specifically asking if you have anything. “Do you have any food with you…?” (This would be your last chance to declare it).

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Are we good with nail clippers now? In hand luggage

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They take pork products particularly seriously. At least on their flag carrier, China Airlines, it would be incredibly hard to ignore the video played prior to landing with the talking pigs specifically pointing this out.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

See: Hanlon's Razor

[–] Today@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

Bioterrorist deported.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 33 points 5 months ago (2 children)

when this is the first sign you see stepping off an airplane in Taiwan, I ain’t bringing anything into the country …

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I read, "fuck you Britain and fuck your opium cartel past." Seems understandable on that specific front.

[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So pork is a narcotic now?

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I believe you may have missed the point

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

A better headline, not written by an asshole:

"Tourist brings wrong lunch, fined $9,000 for pork combo"

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.de 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Better Headline yet: Reckless visitor tries to sneak in forbidden food and gets a fine.

There is a reason for this ban, its announced everywhere, and you even have a chance to give it up before going through the checks. Its your responsibility to obey local laws, whether you like them or not.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I accidentally brought pork empanadas into the US on my carry on. I didnt want to keep them, they were kinda gross and was looking to toss them, they still made me wait in line somewhere and I missed my flight.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

What temperature do you have to cook pork to to destroy flu virus? USDA says 145⁰F, but that's more general for bacteria and parasites.

Cooked pork seems very low risk. Taiwan's policy does not appear grounded in science.

[–] rhandyrhoads@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What if it was only cooked to 130 or 140? Are they supposed to ask and trust everyone what temperature their lunch was cooked to?

[–] LinusSexTips@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Poor traveler thought they'd heat it up for them on arrival.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

The article states that the virus is very resistant to many environmental changes and can “survive” for a long time on clothes, boots, and even some pork products. This is probably one of many issues involved during an outbreak.

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Almost no countries allow meat products due to potential exposure that couldn't be easily seen. Sometimes for commercially prepared meats there are exceptions but these are in relatively few countries. For countries with substantial livestock keeping diseases out is critical to their economy and therefore treated with such a high level of urgency.

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Honest question: do these animal flu/fever survive cooking?

[–] scoobford@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 months ago

Not proper cooking to a well temp, but you never really know if proper food safety practices were observed or not.