this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
341 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2710 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhatIsThePointAnyway@lemmy.world 91 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He is a narcissist child who was given way too much power. He will continue to act out like the spoiled bitch he is. He has never had to face consequence before so he will continue.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The silver lining is he hasn't ever built up a tolerance for consequences in the course of his life. So a little should hopefully go a long way.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Yeah, but unfortunately with how charged everything is if he gets anything he will claim political persecution and try to be a martyr ( his campaign has claimed they already raised 55m since the conviction). It's why I think he didn't get really anything bad when he violated the gag order so much.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but unfortunately with how charged everything is if he gets anything he will claim political persecution and try to be a martyr

He did that when he won.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, all the hand wringing about how he might twist anything punitive into a positive is moronic since Trump whines when he wins too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, but unfortunately with how charged everything is if he gets anything he will claim political persecution and try to be a martyr

He’s doing that now. He will do it if he is sentenced, and ALSO if he doesn’t get jail time. Appeasing him gets you exactly nothing.

( his campaign has claimed they already raised 55m since the conviction).

His campaign claims a lot of things, none of them true. It would be surprising if this turned out to be the first time they weren’t lying.

It's why I think he didn't get really anything bad when he violated the gag order so much.

I think the judge was going overboard to give every benefit of the doubt to Trump so there would be no basis for appeal. I hope that’s the case.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, but unfortunately with how charged everything is if he gets anything he will claim political persecution and try to be a martyr

Agreed 100% but to be fair, he's already (been) doing that.

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 60 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Why should merchan be lenient when the entire time the orange turd was hurling insults and the system, the judge, the judges family and the jurors while displaying a level of contempt, lack of decorum and respect for the institution, and an absolute lack of contrition?

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Donald is a stochastic terrorist urging his Trumpanzee cult to threaten and harass jurors and court staff. He is a danger to society. Hopefully the judge now feels able to take that into account for sentencing, despite failing to take any of that into account during the violations of court orders.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He's full of hot air. Anyone that follows him and does something stupid will fuck it up and end up in jail themselves. Giving him any sort of credence is the problem with the right. They think they seem badass. To most they seem like whiny little babies incapable of accomplishing simple goals other than being the little brother that refuses to eat their broccoli.

[–] stangel@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Paul Pelosi would like a word. We can't keep giving these terrorists latitude while they practice how to get it right.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would say that Pelosi is a perfect example of that. Because he's in for 40 years. My point is we can't be scared of their posturing. It's just them trying to be intimidating.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Did you forget about the whole January 6th thing? It'll be even easier to get them to do it a second time since they're even more radicalized now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Jan 6 almost succeeded.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He needs to be moderate, not lenient. Trump’s legal team is looking for any and all reasons to win an appeal. Now is not the time to show bias.

With that being said, the judge determines sentencing partly on the character of the defendant. Trump’s behavior certainly won’t help him in that respect.

[–] Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago

100% this is why I'm hoping for community service. Done in a very public facing way. Putting a near 80 year old on jail for a first time offense would show bias. However, him show contempt for the justice system and his instance of making a spectacle of the entire process should be a major consideration. Have him, legit, in a reflective vest picking up trash, would be considered a light sentence if you consider the range of punishments. It would definitely, attempt, to force some agenda of teaching humbleness. Hearing his complaints, or his supporters, saying that he's too old for that type of work would take so much wind out of the sails out of old Joe narrative.

Maybe I'm just rationalizing for my popcorn motives though lol

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I want to see him behind bars, but it would be almost as good to see him forced to do community service helping undocumented immigrants.

[–] Yprum@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why would you make the immigrants suffer his presence? They have it hard enough as it is. I prefer to think he'll get to make some nice friends in prison.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

He'd have to be kind to them otherwise he'd be held in contempt and thrown in jail.

The immigrants seeing him forced to be helpful and kind would probably be satisfying?

[–] null@slrpnk.net 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Me too, but he would simply refuse.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

So prison it is then!

[–] CuttingBoard@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 months ago

He could toss rolls of paper towels at them, he's the best at that.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nothing will happen to this entitled fuck, just like always.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Shhh, I have 6 more weeks of fantasizing!

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If you turn it upside down you can probably get another six weeks after too.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Don't dangle that in front of me you teases

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

In the article, the two interviewed experts who got the most paragraphs said there's zero chance, making arguments based on precedent.

One interviewed expert said he expects multiple years in prison based on an emotional appeal.

We see which one got the headline though.

[–] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (3 children)

At worst Trump will get another stern talking to, as he always has.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I hope he keeps at it, give the judge more reason to keep hitting him with the book

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 10 points 5 months ago

God forbid you have a misdemeanor and get 6 months in nyc.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

90 days jail is my prediction. Stayed pending appeal which will push it past the election.

Trump won't sit a day.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If he wins, he’d still go to jail

[–] enleeten@discuss.online 3 points 5 months ago

Maybe he'd just never go back to NY again lol

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Insulting and defaming is the orange felon's way of asserting power even while he is clearly down and out.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Of course. In the typical way of losing an argument so he threatens and yells instead. Can’t pound facts so he pounds the table instead. He has no other way of working.

load more comments
view more: next ›