this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024

401 points (96.7% liked)

News

23367 readers

3117 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

401

The number of deaths in ICE custody is already more than double all of last year (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 5 months ago by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

99 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240603120144/https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/number-deaths-ice-custody-already-double-last-year-rcna154659

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (9 children)

The article suggests that the issues occur most in private detention centers, and argues that ill detainees should be relocated to healthcare facilities. Private detention centers most certainly should be abolished, and not just for ICE detainees.

The article also states they have been 10 deaths in FY 2024 according to ICE.gov, however the website only shows 6. I’m guessing the website is not updated, but the article only identifies two deaths since January, making the total 8. I haven’t found information on the other two deaths reported elsewhere.

Here are the number of deaths by fiscal year from ICE.gov:

FY 2024 - 6 (10 reported by NBC)

FY 2023 - 4

FY 2022 - 3

FY 2021 - 5

FY 2020 - 21

FY 2019 - 8

FY 2018 - 6

www.ice.gov/detain/detainee-death-reporting

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for posting the actual numbers. This article is pretty shitty imo. I read it just to see if they even included them (I guess, to their credit, at least they did that).

4,3,5 and 10(even though the govt is reporting 6) over the last 4 years.

So even assuming 10 is correct, using the "more than doubled" almost seems like journalistic malpractice. At best it's click-bait garbage. Where was the "ICE sees 25% drop in in-custody deaths" article a few years ago?

Should we watch it to see if it's a broader trend? Yea, probably. Is this necessarily indicative of anything nefarious? No.

There could be (and likely are) legitimate reasons for the increase that have nothing to do with "ICE bad". Like maybe, people coming in already sick, maybe an older demographic, unvaccinated people, etc etc. or literally just random fucking chance.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (12 children)

Why are we keeping them in such poor conditions if they're already sick? Why aren't they in hospitals?

load more comments (12 replies)

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The numbers are interesting and I bet the 2020 number is very high because of covid, but them comparing total deaths might be statistical deception.

How old were the people who died? What were the causes of death? Did the total amount of people in detention stay consistent over time?

According to the article, a few of the ones listed are pretty young, but they didn't show causes of death.

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Trump's next rally:

"I can do better!"

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Crazy thought, but maybe it's not the President in charge. Maybe it's the record high heat and the deplorable conditions of confinement.

Maybe we shouldn't be holding these people in concentration camps to begin with.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe the president should have tackled the bad conditions in ICE detainment like he promised? He promised a more fair and humane system after Trump's abuses of detainees and instead he's treated Trump's conditions as a record to beat.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe the president should have tackled the bad conditions in ICE detainment like he promised?

Sounds like pie-in-the-sky leftist agitprop to me.

He promised a more fair and humane system after Trump’s abuses of detainees and instead he’s treated Trump’s conditions as a record to beat.

Everyone knows that a Democratic President doesn't have the same authority as a Republican President.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

So fun fact. On my phone I have you tagged as sarcastic. But on my computer I haven't figured out how to tag people yet.

But yes.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

ICE is controlled by the department of Homeland Security, which is under the executive branch. As we remember from civics class, the president is directly responsible for the executive branch. The president is responsible for the atrocities at the border.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Are you telling me that the current President - Joe Biden - is responsible for a rising tide of migrants dying from heat exposure in ICE detainment centers?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Yes. Who else?

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You'd think that would make Republicans like Biden...

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, sorry, four years of Trump vs. four years of Biden should really have put to rest the idea that both parties are the same, even if they sometimes support the same bad policies.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I mean to be fair the Democrats trotted out an obscenely draconian immigration bill that was basically every Republicans wet dream about the border and the only reason it didn't pass was because it included Ukraine funding and the Republicans didn't want to give Biden a win.

Call me crazy, but giving the Republicans everything they want just to gain small concessions is bonkers and makes it seem like Democrats really don't have that much of a problem with horrific policies that Republicans want.

The Democrats leaned on DREAMers for like a decade and were going to fucking throw them under the bus with that border bill in a way that screamed "Political capital is used up, fuck them DREAMers!"

They are not the same but Democrats spend way too much time trying to make deals with people who only want to hurt them and others so they can be seen "reaching across the aisle."

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure they did that knowing the Republicans would reject it. It was political brinksmanship.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The Senate Democrats also reintroduced the bill on its own, and let the Republicans vote against it. This was absolutely a political move on their part, letting the GOP tear itself apart arguing about whether they should've voted for or against it. They're taking advantage of the existing tensions and divisions within the party to weaken them.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (4 children)

and brinskmanship is a good thing? That's how you catch the car and end up the villain. It's the brinksmanship that Republicans played for a decade that led to Donald Trump getting elected. Do not make the mistake of thinking the Democrats are somehow immune to that effect.

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

four years of Trump vs. four years of Biden should really have put to rest the idea that both parties are the same

Biden isn't on Twitter, so we can ignore the wars and the concentration camps and the Cop Cities and the deteriorating climate.

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

He picks different supreme court justices though and has some different head of agencies, though. That alone makes a big difference.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Dems had the opportunity to stop up the ACB nomination in 2020 the same way Repubs blocked Garland in 2016. In fact, it would have been easier. Feinstein only had to hold up the vote for three months compared to McConnell's twelve. Dems waved her through, the same way Joe Biden's Judiciary Committee waved through Clarence Thomas back in 1991, months before Bill Clinton took office.

Its not enough to say which Presidents are picking the nominees. The senatorial strategies are totally different. Republicans hold Dem nominees hostage while Dems rubber stamp whatever assholes the GOP cough up.

Had Dem Senators punted on Thomas and ACB when they had the opportunity, the SCOTUS of today would look totally different.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (28 children)

Since I didn't get a response from the other person, perhaps you could explain why Judge Jackson is the sort of SCOTUS justice Trump would have picked.

load more comments (28 replies)

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How do you think we got here exactly?

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Reagan

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And who did nothing to fix it since exactly?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

An election nearly four years ago? What a strange question.

Now, please explain to me how Judge Jackson would be the same sort of justice Trump would have nominated to SCOTUS.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

How come SCOTUS is so fucked exactly? Who could have done something to fix it in the forty plus years we've known this was an issue an didn't?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

The general lack of empathy for these people is disgusting.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

5, 3, 4,then 10 deaths in the past four years including 2024, all inmates were given medical and dental, psychological support and there are two causes of death of in the article unknown, which is probably the most cause for concern.

I looked it up.

The two unknown are undergoing investigations now, standard practice in ICE to investigate cause of death

8 of the deaths since 2018 resulted from covid in at-risk populations, 9 from suicide, which I think is a little higher than the american average of 14 per 100,000 people, but some of these people left notes saying that if they might be sent back then they're going to kill themselves, so... More high stakes, more pressure in a lot of these situations obviously.

Most of the covid deaths were in high risk patients, the elderly or chronically ill with kidney issues or the like.

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So basically, you just did more legwork than the journalist that published this article and there isn't a big story here. Maybe if those 2 deaths come back "omg aliens killed them" we'd have a story.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

It looks like they just wanted to say double the deaths and hope somebody gasped.

[–] unreasonabro@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I mean, what this actually says is there's been a year within the last five that was worse. Obviously nobody should be dying and frankly ICE should not exist and murica just needs to stop pretending it's so special since it's such shit to begin with, but "within the range of the last five years" is just a boring angle to write an article from.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

10 deaths versus 4.

Lies, damned lies, and statistics....

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago

Build The Wall Back Better, my harm reduction vote in action :')

[–] rez_doggie@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Pigs thrive in environments that encourage violence

load more comments