Dude probably has no idea how to properly handle a gun, AND he has a permanent secret service detail.
This has zero impact on his life, other than politically.
this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
-45 points (9.1% liked)
Conservative
479 readers
227 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
Here's what the same gun group said about Hunter Biden using a 2A argument in his case. The judge denied the argument.
that's right, that Hunter Biden, who, despite his father's long standing and well known disdain for the second amendment, is now turning to the exercise of his rights to shield him from prosecution. "Rules for thee but not for me" eh Hunter?
Now this don't make a damn lick of sense. If we need guns to protect ourselves from gubmint tyranny, and y'all plan to put that feller back in the gubment, then what the hell does he need a gun for?
This sounds like undigested talking points being regurgitated in a warm mental vomit stew, with lots of little chunks of everything in there.