this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
810 points (97.8% liked)

solarpunk memes

2843 readers
8 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Headline: Libertarians be like Picture of disugested women next to "Tyranny.gov" Picture of intressted women next to "Tyranny.com"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 54 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago

V1 onion link eww

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

I've never seen .bit

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The interconnectedness of the world and our systems make it too complex for small government now. I mean, what’s the libertarian answer to global pandemics or climate change? Hands off doesn’t work in all cases

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Don't know exactly how you define 'libertarians', but if you mean right wing/small government advocates, I'm with you.

[–] toaster@slrpnk.net 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think they're referring to right-wing libertarians specifically.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

The only libertarians in the general population's consciousness are right-wing, as libertarian political parties were literally financed by fossil fuel, tobacco, and weapons manufacturer oligarchs — the US Libertarian parties first presidential candidate was a fucking Koch bro (billionaire fossil fuel oligarch) — all because they wanted to pay less taxes and deregulate their businesses, after regulations like the clean air act meant they could no longer destroy waterways and create acid rain without consequence.

99% of the human population have no idea that left-wing libertarians exist, or that libertarianism was considered left-wing and progressive prior to right-wing appropriation in the 1960/70's.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

prior to right-wing appropriation in the 1960/70's.

Because when its been this way for long enough to be considering retirement, the way it used to be is pretty irrelevant to the discussion.

It's like calling Republicans the party of Lincoln. It has no connection to today's politics.

[–] III@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

It has no connection to today’s politics.

"We are the party of Lincoln, so let us fly our confederate flags!" I mean, it does connect... just in an "opposite day" kind of way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] toaster@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Libertarian is the opposite of authoritarian on the political compass. It's a shame that it's had a phase shift in meaning and most people assume it's right-wing libtertarianism, i.e. turbo capitalism with no rules/regulations.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

100% this. And it's sad. Because there actually aren't any right wing libertarians. They are (economic) liberals. Rejecting basic tenants of Libertarianism like public ownership of natural resources , and tack on insane BS like the NAP. The man who coined the term libertarian, defined what it was, fought in the fucking French Revolution. He also rallied and fought against the same Liberals larping as libertarians today.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think another implication here is they trust a corporation more than a government

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I'm not condoning this, but one argument I've heard is that it's easier to pick a different corporation (i.e. don't buy from them) than it is to change your government (every 4 years ish) and it's only the political party, not the civil service / employees (or whatever it's called in the USA) that change.

Of course monopolies, huge barriers to entry for new companies, etc, weaken this argument.

As a final note; I think the combination of unions, govt., and private enterprise is the best we can hope for under the existing system.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago (2 children)

it's easier to pick a different corporation (i.e. don't buy from them)

This argument also falls apart when the thing you want to buy is essential and/or all of the companies selling it are horrible (or the very concept of selling it at a profit is horrible), e.g. health insurance, water, housing, staple foods, and so forth.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago

We have cooperatives in a lot of forms being part of our existing system. This is in the form of housing coops, cooperative banks, cooperative stores and worker owned companies. All of them survive and some even thrive in our current system. Mostly they are growing slowly, if at all, but are much more stable and fiscally conservative. They can even work very well on natural monopolies as utility cooperatives have shown.

There are also legal setups like trusts, which can be very benefitial, if done right.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Hear me out: Instead of companies we have various non profit organisations that evenly supply people with goods and have to keep their expenses completely transparent.

I'm sure there's some issues with this and I'm curious to hear them but I feel like this would still be far better than corporations and especially monopolies or oligopolies trying to take our money. (I hope it's clear that these organisations wouldn't have to be like existing ones just operate similarly and I don't care about it not counting as a non profit organisation in some existing government.)

[–] fah_Q@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Libertarian definition 1.Conservatives who like to smoke weed.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 5 months ago

Taxpayers who'd rather not.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Closer to Trump supports that smoke weed. I was once a conservative but the party shifted from my views to racialized Christians.

Now my political stance is closer to liberal.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

I'd say go hard on crack.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 13 points 5 months ago

Omfg this is perfect

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I read that as librarians and was very confused.

[–] PanoptiDon@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago
[–] Chuymatt@beehaw.org 7 points 5 months ago

Impecable use of this meme format.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

tHiS iS sO mUcH bEtTeR bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL aMiRiTe

load more comments
view more: next ›