this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
182 points (94.6% liked)

Data is Beautiful

4930 readers
282 users here now

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

DataIsBeautiful is for visualizations that effectively convey information. Aesthetics are an important part of information visualization, but pretty pictures are not the sole aim of this subreddit.

A place to share and discuss visual representations of data: Graphs, charts, maps, etc.

  A post must be (or contain) a qualifying data visualization.

  Directly link to the original source article of the visualization
    Original source article doesn't mean the original source image. Link to the full page of the source article as a link-type submission.
    If you made the visualization yourself, tag it as [OC]

  [OC] posts must state the data source(s) and tool(s) used in the first top-level comment on their submission.

  DO NOT claim "[OC]" for diagrams that are not yours.

  All diagrams must have at least one computer generated element.

  No reposts of popular posts within 1 month.

  Post titles must describe the data plainly without using sensationalized headlines. Clickbait posts will be removed.

  Posts involving American Politics, or contentious topics in American media, are permissible only on Thursdays (ET).

  Posts involving Personal Data are permissible only on Mondays (ET).

Please read through our FAQ if you are new to posting on DataIsBeautiful. Commenting Rules

Don't be intentionally rude, ever.

Comments should be constructive and related to the visual presented. Special attention is given to root-level comments.

Short comments and low effort replies are automatically removed.

Hate Speech and dogwhistling are not tolerated and will result in an immediate ban.

Personal attacks and rabble-rousing will be removed.

Moderators reserve discretion when issuing bans for inappropriate comments. Bans are also subject to you forfeiting all of your comments in this community.

Originally r/DataisBeautiful

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I shared this in a comment recently and I'm wondering if it led to this post.

Eat less meat, please! Not asking anyone to be vegan, just eat less meat.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think a lot of us have been eating less in general due to how expensive food is right now, and that includes meat so that's a win I guess?

Semi joking aside that's a very reasonable approach to this problem. For some reason people like my parents "need" beef or some kind of meat with every meal, which is expensive and caused my mom to get gout. Yet her diet stays the same. There's very little middle ground with people on this topic, so it's refreshing to see someone suggesting we just eat less of it.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 5 months ago

I need lean protein and meat is the best source. I mostly eat chicken but beef is number 2 behind that. I'll eat pork but don't really care for it. Unfortunately I don't like fish aside from canned tuna. So options are limited. I've tried finding vegetarian meals but most of what I found has poor macros compared to meat and requires a lot more prep time. I don't really care where my nutrition comes from as long as it tastes okay. If they made a human version of dog food that met my macro requirements I'd just carry a bag of that around everywhere.

[–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I cannot see why people want so much beef. Why do you want cows, specifically?

[–] Five@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I shared this in a comment recently and I’m wondering if it led to this post.

Maybe. I got it from @Ephera@lemmy.ml

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Ah, that's a coincidence, in this case.

I had read this comment asking for environmental cost of certain foods and I remembered there being a solid report on that by Hannah Ritchie on ourworldindata.org, so I started researching that, but then stumbled over this graph instead. @zeekaran@sopuli.xyz

[–] Rayspekt@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The difference between beef and lamb, and pigs and poultry is way more than I thought.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I didn't think coffee and chocolate would be so high.

I wonder where tea falls there?

[–] hitwright@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

To be fair a kilogram of coffee or chocolate lasts for a month if not more. It's hard to say that it's that high compared to others.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Nuts are interesting. Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought certain types of nuts (like almonds) require massive amounts of water. I think almonds require more water than an equivalent amount of chicken. I know this chart is about CO2, so kinda a apples to oranges comparison, but I'm curious if that is something that should also be considered when discussing environmental impact of foods?

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I’m not full vegan/vegetarian, but I’ve cut out all the beef/dairy that I can from my diet, just because of how bad cows in general are for the environment with their methane farts, though I think there may be methods to reduce emissions. I’m guessing that costs money though, so fuck that, we need cheap beef. I think if people just took that step of cutting that one animal out of our food chain, it’d be alot easier for people to do, rather than trying to cut out all meat and going vegan.

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

similar here - graphs like this helped the push to cut out most red meat from our menu. Emphasis "most" as we are neither vegan nor do we refuse beef items at restaurants or as guests.

but like you said, by just cutting out most beef, while allowing occasional items, would be a big step forward. We also cut out some pork, and try to get most protein from poultry and plant-protein. The reason for pork then adds seeing how terrible their conditions are and knowing how smart they are.

[–] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How much is it compared to private jets?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Private jets only have a handful of nuts

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Coffee surprised me. I thought it had a fairly low impact overall. Interesting...

[–] Linssiili@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, one cup of coffee tends to use 7 grams of coffee beans. That has the same emissions as 5 grams of lamb.

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

Which means drinking two cups of coffee a day still makes up for around 4 kg of lamb meat per year.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How much of an overlap is there between milk, cheese, and beef? They're all coming from cows, but are they being calculated separately here? There are also gelatin and leather and other non-food products that come from cows. If there is a way to reduce that methane output, then it would be a lot more reasonable and it seems possible since it's impacted greatly by diet.

[–] Wooster@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Dairy cows and beef cows are different breeds. There’s hardly any overlap worth mentioning. For the purposes of these kinds of reports, they might as well be different species.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8281100/

From the article:

Meat production from dairy cows is a significant component of beef production, accounting for almost 10% of U.S. commercial beef production.

10% isn't "hardly any overlap worth mentioning". Even if it was, it doesn't address the overlap between milk and cheese.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

When petrochemical companies get wrangled under control I'll start worrying about this penny ante BS.

[–] blazera@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How is the farm emissions from milk so much lower than from beef?

[–] echutaa@programming.dev 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It’s per kg of product so I’m thinking the product is much larger relative to the herd

[–] Longpork3@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 months ago

Probably a part of it. Working with the typical ages at which they are each killed, a cow killed for beef produces around 100kg meat per year, whereas a cow killed for milk produces both 300kg of milk solids per year and 25kg of meat per year.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I barely ever eat beef since I live in a coastal area with productive waters where the seafood is cheaper, better, and fresher. But I do think the focus on individual contributions to climate change is somewhat misguided. We need to stop digging up carbon and lighting it on fire.

I’m not against individual efforts. I drive an electric car — well, a PHEV that’s got more electric range than I need for my daily life so I only need gas for road trips — and have solar panels and am very much an environmentalist. I get that every little bit counts. But shifting the blame to consumers rather than producers — especially oil/mining companies — seems like a distraction.

It’s like when oil companies promoted plastic recycling, which is a joke 90% of the time, to distract from plastic production. There’s definitely not a shortage of fresh water where I live but people in the southwestern US constantly get told to take shorter showers when the bulk of the water goes agriculture. (We obviously need food but there’s plenty of water-hungry cash crops grown in places where droughts are frequent.)

[–] Bertuccio@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I wonder where high-fructose corn syrup falls.

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

don't rely on poore-nemecek

[–] Lotarion@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

The most efficient way to produce proteins from animals is to farm carp, with beef being the worst possible way.

It was never about efficiency in any way, it's all about preferences

[–] RealBot@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

its wierd that it is compared by CO2/mass, it would make more sense per callories or some important nutrients.