55
I wonder if Garland regrets waiting two years before prosecuting the top Republican insurrectionist. He'll never stop being a conservative, but maybe he'll stop being a Republican.
Strange that the article doesn't mention that, since Biden claimed executive privilege, Garland can't turn the audio over.
Well, they seem focused on the absurdity of this whole thing. And of course, it's a Florida-woman trying to out batshit crazy everyone else.
I just read a little bit about her and she's basically a female George Santos. i.e lied about almost every aspect of her life to become a representative.
Gross.
Are we sure she isn't George Santos?
Funny how I knew it was Anna Paulina Luna just from that description. She's a nutjob.
Over MTG and Boebert???
Sarah Palin was really a trend setter for congesional Republican women.
To be fair, the description included "Florida-woman" so that alone disqualified those other two nutjobs.
Not necessarily in terms of sheer craziness, but the lying about every part of her background is pretty identifying.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember hearing once that even if this were to happen, Congress can't hold him longer than the end of this Congressional term.
More political grandstanding from the party that is bereft of any ideals beyond give the rich more money and worship Trump.
So Congress has one man, with a particular set of skills, tasked with apprehending targets and bringing them to the House floor.
Sounds like a movie idea.
Cool, cool, cool - Jim Jordan, too, right?
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
55 points (95.1% liked)
politics
18042 readers
3045 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS