337
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

For comparison, Washington Post coverage (registration required)

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago

Crazy that we didn't have this already.

Also, how long before a Texas Judge overrules it thanks to Chevron being overturned?

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Within a week, but it'll be a 10th amendment case or something that will work it's way to SCOTUS and somehow they'll use the case to rule OSHA's existence is in violation of the 14th amendment.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 2 days ago

How fast can they get it in front of one?

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 55 points 2 days ago

Good. It should be part of OSHA.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago

Which might have just lost many of its teeth due to the overturning of Chevron. We are in the bad place.

[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Deploy the National Guard to administrate it. Armed. If Texas or Florida cops try to come in between workers and heat relief, fire a couple warning shots. The cops won’t do shit. If they won’t even save school kids from an active shooter, they’re not gonna stop soldiers from supplying water to workers.

[-] Desistance@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Good. So many red states took away heat protections for workers.

this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
337 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18073 readers
2963 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS