this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
131 points (98.5% liked)

askchapo

22931 readers
91 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll start off by pointing out that last 3 primaries have been some kind of funny business.

  • 2016: Bernie snuffed by Hillary with shady tactics that lead to the D losing to Trump (lol).
  • 2020: Everyone drops like flies to support Biden (sus, but allegedly because Trump and Covid were bad).
  • 2024: Biden waits until the last second to announce dropping, there seems to be momentum to skip the Primary and go with Kamala Harris.

Assuming everything I've stated is accurate-enough, do you think the average person is likely to feel like this isn't Democracy? Or will this be business as usual for the US? Will the absence of censorship on tiktok be likely change anything?

For this reason, until there is a primary that Kamala wins, I want every mention of Kamala Harris to be prefixed with a formal title like Kamala Harris, the appointed, the unelected, in a similar vein as Mother of Dragons, Daenerys Targaryen.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 82 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

if you corner a liberal and confront them with enough facts and history they can usually be browbeaten into conceding that it's not a democracy, and then after five minutes of cable news they are back to pretending that their vote means as much as the donations Jeff Bezos makes

[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 48 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is why media criticism is how I try to start deprograming libs. Citations Needed is probably the easiest option for them to get into.

Have to interrupt that backsliding or you'll never get anywhere.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 46 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nima and Adam do have the advantage of being able to go in to soothing NPR stupor voice mode between exasperation and knowledge dumps. It's one of the liberal's key metacognitive weaknesses.

[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 8 months ago

Exactly what I was thinking -- it's a very similar presentation style to classic lib slop.

[–] Ericthescruffy@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This right here. Bullying and browbeating has its place in larger discourse but in my opinion, and based on my own experience, you have more success changing people's minds when you learn them down the path to feel like they figured it out for themselves.

[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Bullying, like posting, is for the audience. If done right (and that's a real easy line to cross) it can sway people listening in, but it's effects on the subject are all over the place.

If you're actually trying to change the mind of the person you're talking to, they first have to respect you, and even then anything beyond friendly cajoling is more likely to backfire than succeed.

The problem is bullying is fun and feels good, and the biggest proponents of it will angrily dismiss any criticism of it as a tactic.

[–] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 38 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is why I'm skeptical of most of the "I managed to talk my Lib/Chud friend/family member into being a socialist" narratives you see online. Seems like you just bullied them into conceding you were right, and I suspect 9/10 they'll just wait a week till the memory or you owning them fades and then watch some Fox/MSNBC and be right back on their bullshit.

[–] starkillerfish@hexbear.net 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I agree. Both Dems and Reps use pseudo-socialist talking points (pro worker, anti rich) so a lot of it is already ingrained in the US psyche. It is not dissonant for them to agree with socialist arguments one day and then with republican newscasters the next day. I’ve had staunch libertarians tell me that they actually want communism more than communists.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 12 points 8 months ago

Ah yes, the classic libertarian fall back of 'Despite having no understanding of my own ideology, I actually understand what your ideology wants better than you do. What, no I haven't actually read anything about it, I just remember history class really well.'

[–] Blockocheese@hexbear.net 11 points 8 months ago

God i feel that, im like fucking sisyphus trying to get libs to remember or read anything

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 15 points 8 months ago

Won't even take five minutes. In one breath they'll admit that voting does nothing, then they'll go right back to fearsturbating about what might happen if Mussolini von Hitler (D NY) doesn't win.

[–] chickentendrils@hexbear.net 58 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

2020 is worse than you recall, Buttigieg and Klobuchar are phoned by Obama the weekend before Super Tuesday to drop out and endorse Biden, who'd ate shit worse than them in the preceeding contests. Warren stays in, reneges on everything she'd campaigned on to work with a Super PAC just so she could get 3rd in her home state.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 34 points 8 months ago

warren-snake-green warren-medusa warren-snake warren-medusa i'd forgotten about this shit. So much happens so fast it's just disaster and defeat after disaster and defeat. None of it sticks

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 48 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think they care, nor do they think it's something to care about. I think for most of them "democracy" is a sacred religious state that has nothing to do with any method of decision making. It signifies holiness, not the day to day bureaucracy of government function. The "democracy" that is at stake for them isn't control of government by the demos, but some kind of spiritual conflict within the American Civic Religion where Trump, as a political outsider not annointed by the system, is a god of evil threatening the ACR's "good" god that they call democracy".

They're completely insane. It's completely irrational religious fanaticism. They're not engaged in political struggle, they're participating in a spiritual ritual where every four years they find out if their faith was strong enough and if the world will be ruled by the god of good or the god of evil. Absolutely delusional, fanatical devotion to a world of magic and spirits.

That's why none of it matters, the death, the misery, the poverty. The world isn't ruled by economics and policy, it's ghosts and devils. They can't effect the material reality around them, they can only lend their faith to the divine power that beats back their idea of evil, and if evil wins at the ballot box it's because they lacked faith and spiritual purity, not anything to do with the vulgar material world.

Just fucking religious madness, it's the only explanation i can beat in to a shape that fits this bullshit.

You can even hear it in how they talk if you can make yourself stop treating them as rational people. Their talk about the "end of democracy" and "the last election" isn't expressing the collapse of the electoral system or a change in government. They mean it's the end of the world. We're in their eschaton, their final battle between good and evil, and they genuinely believe the world will end and we'll have a thousand years of darkness or something if Trump wins. They can't think of political organizing after the election, or of any political action beyond voting, because how could any action they take except casting their holy ballot effect things? They cannot act, only their gods can act. All they can do is perform the rituals their gods demand.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago

warhammer 2k

the systems laid down by more competent learned ancients have become so mysterious and self-sustaining that everything has devolved into a series of complex rituals

[–] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 43 points 8 months ago

are USians likely to notice

bugs-no

Death to America

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 32 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Every four years a new cohort of USians is old enough to pay attention to elections and gets to learn how undemocratic the US actually is, as opposed to what they learn in school.

Anyone who doesn't get the lesson the first time is hopeless, though.

[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Anyone who doesn’t get the lesson the first time is hopeless, though.

It's hard to imagine even one other situation where we'd apply this thinking. It may actually take people a while to change their axiomatic political beliefs.

Our comrades must understand that ideological remolding involves long-term, patient and painstaking work, and they must not attempt to change people's ideology, which has been shaped over decades of life, by giving a few lectures or by holding a few meetings.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s hard to imagine even one other situation where we’d apply this thinking.

How about learning to not touch a hot stove?

[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, but "owie that's hot!" is pretty different from "my entire political worldview that is reinforced by every part of mainstream culture is wrong in a way that would require a mass national movement to change."

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Well, yeah? That's my point.

If someone doesn't figure out why they keep getting burned because the media is telling them the burning sensation is being caused by Russian bots, I don't have a lot of hope.

[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The DNC won a lawsuit after the 2016 primary by arguing in court that they're a private corporation and do not have to even pretend to be democratic, they could pick anyone they want and ignore primary votes and it wouldn't break any laws. This made zero impact on the voting public and the devoted Dem voters will gaslight you and deny there was anything weird about the 2016 election. If you point them to the book written by the DNC chair at the time where she outright says they fixed the primary, they'll do the Westworld "Doesn't look like anything to me" + blank stare

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

One of many things that will immediately raise my bloodpressure to pre-hypertension is trying to beat this information through the ceramide laced brainal dome of the average liberal.

[–] roux@hexbear.net 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

the ceramide laced brainal dome

It just rolls off the tongue doesn't it lol

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was trying to think of "cranial" but I couldn't find it and made something up. : (

[–] roux@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago

lol it's ok gold-communist

[–] MalarchoBidenism@hexbear.net 27 points 8 months ago

Kamala Harris, handpicked successor citations-needed

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

To be fair, westerners have been conditioned to not even think about any alternative to the status quo, so to them the only choice is the two major parties.

And when the other party is the GOP you can see how the "lesser of two evils" voters are created.

Not justifying the vote blue no matter who types, just reminding that the vast majority is condition to be scared to death of revolution, so they hold their nose and that's how we get nerds like Biden. Americans are a sad, scared, brainwashed, oppressed people with a Gucci belt

[–] Jenniferrr@hexbear.net 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Democrats will tell you with a straight face that the Democratic party is a private organization

[–] Blockocheese@hexbear.net 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Did you just tell me to vote for a cheeto????

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 8 points 8 months ago

on this day we are both cheetos

[–] imogen_underscore@hexbear.net 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

no lol things will have to get a lot worse to precipitate any kind of mass class consciousness triggering in the US i think

[–] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 8 months ago

This clusterfuck + a loss to Trump would at least cause a lot of discourse. The question would be if that produces any change in how the party's run (big changes are unlikely, but smaller ones are possible).

[–] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 15 points 8 months ago

Most don't even seem to comprehend how undemocratic the electoral college and the senate are.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

no. they were really angry with the bernie stuff in 2016 but they seem to have forgot their own criticism about it as soon as the election season ended.

for them democracy = voting on a ballot

[–] Staines@hexbear.net 9 points 8 months ago

If you have faith in the system, you don't keep receipts in the same way we do.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've had to explain it to people for years that the primary process doesn't need anybody to vote. All the groups are private entities and not governmental, if they ask their dues paying members or the general public to vote for a candidate they do so because they want to and not because they have to.

[–] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 6 points 8 months ago

furthermore they are all centralist parties (DNC and RNC) at their core and vanguardist for the capitalist class

as always every single accusation is a confession

[–] NapoleonBlownApart@hexbear.net 5 points 8 months ago

This is the first time that BlueMaga types have been disenfranchised. I feel like a lot of them will just stop voting but will tell their friends they still do