this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
273 points (93.6% liked)

AssholeDesign

7544 readers
2 users here now

This is a community for designs specifically crafted to make the experience worse for the user. This can be due to greed, apathy, laziness or just downright scumbaggery.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is after forcing login to a store account:

At least they don’t hide in their ToS that:

“l agree to let Walmart monitor my use of Walmart WiFi, including to:

  • Determine my presence in Walmart stores
  • Associate information about me with my Walmart account
  • Improve products and services
  • Gather market insights about my in-store purchases and activities”

But that’s not enough, they need to monitor your internet activity further too.


For further reading, some greatest hits (the section headers on Wiki’s Criticism of Walmart):

  • Local communities
  • Allegations of predatory pricing and supplier issues
  • Labor relations
  • Poorly run and understaffed stores
  • No AEDs in stores (automated external defibrillators)
  • Imports and globalization
  • Product selection
  • Taxes
  • Animal welfare
  • Midtown Walmart
  • Opioids settlement
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Nah. Their network their rules. Quit your bitching or use 5g.

[–] lemmingnosis@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago (20 children)

privacy sacrifice to use internet in their cavernous dead zone of a building

It was a worthwhile sacrifice, but I’m definitely gonna name & shame! Wouldn’t touch WiFi if it weren’t a dead zone.

Also gave me a chance to complain about some of their other business practices. (Certainly wouldn’t have shopped there if I hadn’t been asked to this one time.)

I’ve never seen this message before so they seem an outlier even in the greedy corporate world. Enough complaints and every once in a while a business changes their practices. Why not whine a little? 🙂

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Not entirely sure if this is possible but I'm increasingly suspicious that they started jamming outside networks within their warehouse. Of course it makes sense that mobile data doesn't really work inside a giant steel warehouse, so perhaps it's just confirmation bias, but I can't seem to recall not having any mobile data signal at all until my last walmart visit.

I used to keep to myself and look up the location of the item I was looking for online. If they want me to bother a floor person for it though, doing that is highly preferable to giving walmart my email to sell along with any information they can extrapolate from my usage of their network.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Jamming is incredibly illegal so I doubt that. They probably just have a bad roof for reception.

Also remember hanlon's razor.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Lol why is this an opinion? If people want to vpn out of my network I don't give a fuuuuuuuuck. Now if you're raw doggin' that traffic or sucking down the bandwidth don't bitch when I filter or throttle, for sure, but surely you can at least empathize with people wanting to use privacy tools, ya tool.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Would you say the same thing if they intercepted HTTPS connections? Or blocked popular ~~DNS~~ (edit: DNS over HTTPS/TLS) resolvers and required you to use the one advertised in DHCP?

I think if you're going to provide WiFi, just do it and stop spying on me.

The reason they want this is probably so they can tie your Walmart account to your position inside the store. And see which other sites you visit to find a better price, etc.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yes. Their public network. I have no expectations of any privacy on a public network. This is privacy 101.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Dude. End to end encryption. That is network privacy 101.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

You're conflating the individual practice of having a pessimistic threat model with a corporation's entitlement to behave badly.

Of course I assume the worst from Walmart or any other public network — I just think they should have some class and provide a public good to their customers without creepy privacy invasion. Somehow they manage to provide free water in fountains without requiring me to scan my driver's license.

If they published a white paper explaining the Differential Privacy properties of their customer analysis tech, I might revise my opinion.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fishos@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (11 children)

Exactly. "Hey, we're gonna let you use our network. But if you do anything illegal or shady on our network, we'd be held liable. So we're gonna track what you do on our network to make sure if you do try something, we can remove you from the network and have proof."

I mean, yeah, they're also gonna collect advertising data, but do you really expect to have an expectation of privacy when using someone else's network? Just like they can film you in the building, they can monitor your network traffic on their network.

If this surprises you, maybe you should do some more research on how a network actually works. And get a VPN. And maybe don't connect to random public networks(you don't even want to know what OTHER PEOPLE can do to you on those networks, nevermind the company).

Also, you pay for your cellphone service, right? Are you paying for the wifi in the store? Nooooooo. They're giving it to you for free. Almost like they're offering you something in return for that data monitoring. Like they're offering you a service with a built in method to recoup costs... A service you voluntarily use and in doing so, agree to their terms.

Or you, you know, don't use it.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

but do you really expect to have an expectation of privacy when using someone else's network

That is kind of the concept behind the internet. A bunch of networks passing packets along, using the same protocol, not asking questions about their content.

Fifteen years ago we had a whole battle and everyone other than the evils at the top were against deep packet inspection. This new generation is a bunch of bootlickers.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

Yeah, wtf is going on here? You're allowed to say corporations shouldn't do things, even if they're technically legal.

Are these people such fierce libertarians that they support Eli Lilly's right to price gouge diabetics for their insulin?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] takeda@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

LOL, "your communication cannot go through our service that we can monitor, so somebody else might be spying on you, black is white, war is peace, freedom is slavery"

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 27 points 3 months ago

Start giving their store one star reviews and mention this

[–] ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Please just don’t use public WiFi and if you do, assume that your privacy and security are at risk.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Or use a vpn if you really must. I’ve noticed that most Walmarts have really bad cellular connectivity and this is probably the reason why

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 18 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I don't understand why you would need wifi in a supermarket. What are you doing while shopping that mobile data can't handle?

[–] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Large warehouse type buildings make getting a signal difficult ESPECIALLY in a walmart. I prefer using the app to find items I wouldn't otherwise know where to look.

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I didn't consider those absurdly large US malls, my bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] undefined@links.hackliberty.org 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Oh this gives me good reason to find a Walmart. I would love to see how it handles VPNs and it would be a fun game to set up a travel router that can obfuscate the VPN tunnel if needed.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Using OpenVPN or Wireguard should work because they typically use port 443, which you can't block without killing the internet connection altogether.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Wireguard uses UDP which you definitely can block without breaking HTTPS (just QUIC aka HTTP/3). And its default is port 51820, I believe.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

I use a VPN just fine inside a Walmart. It's annoying you need a Walmart account now to use it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 13 points 3 months ago

Murrica lmao

[–] darganon@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Offering open wifi for the public is a terrifying thought.

[–] FMEEE@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just set up a cheap squid proxy or an http proxy. They often still work

[–] offspec@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A wire guard peer would probably be better

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›