this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

Socialism

2844 readers
55 users here now

Beehaw's community for socialists, communists, anarchists, and non-authoritarian leftists (this means anti-capitalists) of all stripes. A place for all leftist and labor news and discussion, as long as you're nice about it.


Non-socialists are welcome to come to learn, though it's hard to get to in-depth discussions if the community is constantly fighting over the basics. We ask that non-socialists please be respectful and try not to turn this into a "left vs right" debate forum by asking leading questions or by trying to draw others into a fight.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

ACAB is a common slogan, especially in anarchist spaces. Should we really be using it though? It is a reference to children born without their parents being married, and due to christian morality is seen as inherently negative. It is effectively a slur. Do we really think that trying to enforce the hierarchies we are trying to get away from on others is going to help us? How have we allowed this slogan to become so common?

As an anarchist I think we should be defending these people, not punishing them with the hope of some of that transferring to cops.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No one in earnest hears someone get called a bastard and wonders about their parentage these days.

It's simply a derogatory word.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree, but this is still a good opportunity to interrogate our assumptions about this, and particularly to listen to folks born out of wedlock to check if those assumptions are at all accurate to their experiences.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 10 points 3 months ago

I agree with the examination of language. My issue with this particular case is that unless someone brings it up, there is no way to know someone's parental status. It just does not matter to anyone that I have ever interacted with, so has never come up in conversation or even crossed my mind to ask. Bastard is kind of a vestigial insult.

[–] rosethornRangerTTV@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've still heard people with that parentage called a bastard because of it though, so what about what they think, what about their experiences? Are they just not people to you?

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've never experienced that and known numerous people who could be referred to as bastard children.

I think you'll have trouble revising the slogan based on this quibble, even if there is this well meaning reasoning behind it.

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Anther example is Bitch referring to a female dog. Now it's just slang and the only people that still refer to female dogs this way are older English, Americans, & farmers it seems.

edit: motherfuckers indeed do not (usually) have intercourse with thier mother

[–] millie@beehaw.org 15 points 3 months ago

Too much hand wringing. We do better when we're not tiptoeing around our own words and actions terrified to sneeze.

[–] Rekhyt@beehaw.org 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I saw a headline today about Trump (in private) calling Kamala Harris a bitch and someone referred to it as a slur (presumably against women). Since there's not an exact equivalent for men, but bastard is usually the "equivalent" male-aimed curse word, I was wondering when we would see someone on beehaw arguing that "bastard" is a slur, but against the children of unmarried parents.

Bastard is only a slur against a person born to unmarried parents if being born to unmarried parents is considered wrong. In older times, this WAS seen as wrong, because sex outside of marriage, and raising a child outside of a traditional family unit, was seen as wrong.

Bastard lost its 'slur' edge a long time ago. Trying to call it a slur is assigning "wrongness" to the state of being born to unmarried parents.

Words change meaning over time. Calling someone "queer" used to be an insult (now it can be used as hate speech but I can also say "Oh my friend Lucy? She's queer." without it being hateful). For that matter, queer didn't always have sexual implications (it meant weird) — I feel like trying to call bastard a slur is the same as trying to say "queer" is a slur against the neurodivergent.

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

yeah I only use bitch and cunt to insult men these days. or inanimate objects.

interestingly, "vixen" used to be a similar insult to bitch. it's a female fox, nowadays it implies a seductive quality but back in the day it meant the same thing as bitch

[–] Rekhyt@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah calling a woman a bitch just oozes extra sexism that calling a man that doesn't. That's definitely in slur territory as far as I am concerned.

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

it's not even so much that it's a slur, it's just fucking lazy. if a woman is being an asshole, tell her she's being an asshole. or a dick

[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's still tons of people who will judge you for having children without getting married. A lot of religious groups still consider it a moral failure. And even if it was completely accepted now, it still became an insult in the first place because of that stigma, and you'd still be using it within that historical context. You can't reclaim a slur by continuing to use it as an insult and ignoring where it comes from.

As an example, I've seen pretty many people use slurs for Romani people as a term for getting scammed or cheated. Usually they didn't know the origin of the term, and didn't mean any harm by it. They had heard it being used and assumed it was just another word. But you don't just accept the definition these people have in their heads as an alternate definition, disconnected from the original. It has the meaning it does based on bigoted stereotypes, and by using it they're still spreading that, even if they aren't hateful themselves.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago

The religious people I know would not use bastard, though. Not in any context. Cursing is a sin to them. To my knowledge bastard has not be used in conjunction with systemic oppression, so the Romani comparison is not quite apt.

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

nah, the meanings of words change over time. using bastard for its original definition is really only done historically, or in fiction. nowadays it just means an unpleasant person

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Was bastard used in the systemic oppression of anyone? That sounds like sarcasm, but I am genuinely curious. Most of the ableist and racist slurs were and are currently used in that manner. Bastard to my knowledge has really only been used in it's original form in a far less systemic way, and typically only for those rich enough for it to matter to them. Someone pointed out religious people not being OK with kids born out of wedlock, and that is true. That being said, I grew up in a very evangelical household, and bastard was considered a bad word, so would not be used at all, much less in that context.

[–] rosethornRangerTTV@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago

it was used in systematic oppression, yes, in many instances historically and many ways in different groups

[–] rosethornRangerTTV@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

https://www.pricegen.com/bastardy-or-illegitimacy-in-england/

some info I found it

a common thing is a lack of support structures or networks, often forced out of the nuclear family unit

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The laws listed in that collection all punish the parents, not the children. Most of them require the father to support the child, with the one in 1747 even giving the children apprenticeships with local tradesmen and farmers.

[–] rosethornRangerTTV@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

if they have to make laws to make sure the children aren't abandoned, they are abandoned often

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but the laws are a sign of systemic support, not oppression.

[–] rosethornRangerTTV@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

there are laws against rape, yet it is still used as a tool to maintain oppression and as oppression itself.

I'm done with this conversation

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

All Cops are Cunts

Better?

[–] rosethornRangerTTV@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

idk the history of that word as well as it is not used my in dialect really, but there is the whole sexist angle in that one that doesn't really seem like much of a help to us

calling someone one of the oppressed classes as an insult doesnt seem the right way to go about it

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Plays well in Australia 🤷

[–] tilefan@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

all cops are bratzz

[–] Twinkletoes@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

All Cops Are Blue, as in depressed 😔 That’s why they lash out so much. They just need therapy, a big long hug, and a good cry.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This very much minimizes the violence perpetrated by the cops while blaming depression.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

I’m pretty sure it’s sarcasm.

[–] rosethornRangerTTV@beehaw.org 6 points 3 months ago

cops kill people for being depressed, isn't that just victim blaming?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We're just retaking bastard as a slur to mean "murderous asshole" one step at a time.

It's very much an American saying, and Americans don't care about the other kind, don't think too much about it.

What bugs me about ACAB is that it's ultimately an attack on the only strong union in America, but it's not like those bastards have solidarity so w/e.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 9 points 3 months ago

Police unions are not unions in the same way a workers union is a union. They exist to uphold state sanctioned violence and protect the perpetrators of said violence, not create a strong working class through solidarity.

[–] rosethornRangerTTV@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

reclaiming a slur means using it as a positive reference to the oppressed group, you are just using the slur

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 3 months ago

That's fair. We're just stealing it from the fundies then.

[–] Kwakigra@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are variations such as your British style "all coppers are bastards" and the style I'm more familiar with which stands for "all cops are bad."

[–] rosethornRangerTTV@beehaw.org 3 points 3 months ago

sadly that doesn't seem to be what most people mean when they say it, lots of people defending it in comments

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago

something that is spurious, irregular, inferior, or of questionable origin

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

I always get thrown off with ACAB and read it as A Cop at Birth like AMAB AND AFAB for male and female at birth for transgenders.