this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
360 points (97.4% liked)

News

22852 readers
3182 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 68 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I feel like we should at least consider that DJI is a mainland Chinese company and nearly all drone innovation in the past decade has originated there. They are no strangers to extreme manufacturing or advanced automated drone technology.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Quadcopters are actually insanely simple devices. I dont think the west would have any issue making hundreds of thousands of them without the help of china. Maybe the chips could be an issue but im sure taiwan would be happy to provide.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

The future of drone warfare will be determined by software. That's the one thing where the US still have a huge lead.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I dont think the west would have any issue making hundreds of thousands of them without the help of china.

Insanely simple devices still require a certain minimal amount of materials and manpower to assemble. The terrible secret of the Chinese economy is that they simply have more people doing more manufacturing labor. Sure, they often have state of the art equipment and a robust, heavily industrialized logistics system (one reason why western efforts to pivot off-shore manufacturing to Indonesia, Malaysia, India, and the Indochina Peninsula haven't been particularly successful). But first and foremost, you need physical labor. Americans don't have a superabundance of domestic labor, so they're not capable of rapidly churning out lots of low-cost, disposable weapons systems at a rate comparable to the Chinese mainlanders.

And that's before you get into the cost of deploying, maintaining, and upgrading a large network of low quality units over a long time frame. Imagine building and deploying an entire fleet of Mark 1 Defense Drones to the island, only to discover a major security vulnerability that renders them easily inoperable. You've got hundreds of thousands of these units in the field, all of which need to be recalled, patched, and re-tested. That takes manpower, too.

The reason these low cost easily distributed systems work for, say, Houthi Rebels and Palestinian dissidents is that they've got these diffuse cells of insurgents with very little else to do except fight. These large ad hoc guerrilla forces are more a consequence of the deplorable state of the local economy than the fighting power of the region. Idle hands, etc.

Americans don't have that. We're at near full-employment. We can't peel off a tens of thousands of young men to go work on the drone assembly lines without suffering economic shortfalls. Hell, neither can Israel, which is why their domestic economy is tanking while they try to make war with virtually all of their Arab neighbors.

The Chinese economy has capacity to spare. The American economy does not. That's the same problem the Japanese ran into during WW2, and a big reason why they got washed in Mainland China after a decade of horrifying genocidal occupation.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

Its funny but when I think of drones and innovation I don't think of china. China just mass produces but for the most part when the current class of true drones were being created I remember a lot of amateurs working on it and others, china being one of them stealing the base tech. Just like 3d printing.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

China just mass produces but for the most part when the current class of true drones were being created I remember a lot of amateurs working on it and others, china being one of them stealing the base tech.

Wait... you think amateur hobbyists out in the American suburbs are inventing new forms of independent flight technology from kits they bought on Amazon. And then some of the largest and most well-financed universities in the world are stealing the technology?

Just purely out of curiosity, who do you think Mingjing Qi, a professor of energy and power engineering at Beihang University stole this schematic from?

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Nope. I was involved and it was people all over the world who started building autonomous and semi autonomous drones them starting back in the mid 2000's when cheap inertial and gyro stabilizers started appearing. I remember the open source projects that eventually matured into commercial products. China was by no means at the forefront of that. It was hobbyist the world over. Some were students at universities. Some lived in the suburbs and villages and big cities. The world over. Way before the alpha tech in that article. That they have taken those first steps and mass produced them by no means implies they invented it all.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 36 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Ever notice how Ukraine has to beg for support but Taiwan has a blank check against a far more capable potential enemy?

Just noticing that maybe Ukraine should start making semiconductors.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

I think it’s also that opposing China is bipartisan, but the Republicans take bribes from Putin.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Taiwan does not have a blank check.

The US has backed away from any language of the martial agreements with Taiwan.

Have you noticed how aggressive China has been to Taiwan ? Or is it only bad if it is Japan being aggressive towards Taiwan ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

So does Israel. Israel receives checks for weapons and armaments they can resell, ~~Ukraine receives loans along with the associated debt~~. It's a regional power thing for the US, treat certain friendly countries at strategic hotspots in such a way that they hold key industries or resources others have to rely on, creating a situation of mutual dependence and giving an incentive for other countries to also support them. Ukraine has Europe and NATO right beside it, so it's much less on the priority list for the US.

It also creates a bunch of problems, specially when it involves a country that's borderline religious neocolonialism, and doesn't work that well against large world and regional powers that are working together like China, Russia, or even Iran.

But Ukraine really does deserve better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ukraine has had massive success with naval drones which I would imagine to translate very well to the defence of Taiwan as well.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The difference between hypersonic missiles and drones is interesting, too. Hypersonics are something a major nation state needs a years long development program to make. They have some inherent issues, like having a limited maneuvering budget without burning themselves up. The response time of defenses are shorter, but existing Patriot missile batteries have managed to deal with them to at least some success.

Meanwhile, Ukraine attaches bombs to some fancy RC planes and sinks much of the Black Sea Fleet. IIRC, they're up to something like half of it by tonnage, and Russia likely has no way to replace some of the larger Soviet-era ships.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Millions of inexperienced soldiers stuck on ships facing thousands of drones coming from all directions -
I...don't want to imagine the absolute, pure horror that would be.
The fact that the two current superpowers are actually gearing up for war with each other makes my blood freeze.
This would cause global suffering on par with World War 2. Except in World War 2, most battles were still fought primarily with glorified armored tractors, rifles, shovels and horse-drawn artillery.
Oh, and now, there's the added danger of a nuclear escalation that will literally bomb us all back into the stone age.

[–] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago

This is nothing different to what they've been doing for the last 20 years

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

All of this is a lot of flexing, there’s no reason for China to cause massive conflict with the US because both parties would lose in some major ways. Essentially it would just waste resources between the two nations and permanently kneecap both of their economies.

Not to mention that I don’t think any nation is in a position to challenge the US anywhere in the near future. A minor conflict could break out, sure, but an actual war where the US takes the gloves off is not a good idea for anybody.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thegr8goldfish@startrek.website 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow! I, for one, will plan to be both shocked and awed by the 'hellscape'.

[–] aodhsishaj@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Now with 50% more A.I !

[–] JATtho@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

More like defending TSMC... large majority of all high-tech silicon is made in Taiwan. If that foundry burns, the consequences would be astronomical. The possible consequences are already at a point they could make threats via self-sabotage.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

My faith that this plan will succeed is a bit shaken by the other news story about the Navy today: the Navy ran out of pants.

We can't seem to produce enough pants for our sailors and marines, but we expect to produce "thousands upon thousands" of fancy new drones? Well I do hope it all works out, but uh, I guess I'll just keep my fingers crossed.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

You sure they are simply choosing to not wear pants?

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, I'm not making any assumptions...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shasta@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The folks making pants and the ones making drones are not the same

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›