this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
287 points (96.4% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“When other states were banning books from schools, we were banishing hunger from ours"
- Governor #TimWalz

#coachWalz #Kamala @politics@lemmy.world @politics@a.gup.pe #politics #dnc @elections

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 weeks ago

This rocks.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There is some question when you can classify Harris/Walz as a movement and not a campaign.

But, IMO the harder question is when Walz will be a cultural icon.

[–] hohoho@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When he becomes President at 68 and establishes a Green New Deal he’ll be the FDR of this generation.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

IMO, it will come when he's a VP and boils down an issue into a couple of words in a way that is just common sense.

The Green New Deal is the most misunderstood concept of the left.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes please. The “Green New Deal” term is tainted, plus we can’t afford to wait until Walz is President

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

May I suggest…

“A Relatively Unheard of Agreement in a Mild Shade of Aquamarine?”

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The basic parts of the Green New Deal were implemented by Obama and Biden.

That's the thing. Either people don't really know what it says or what's already been done.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

They should run with "Make America Free Again". Remind voters that "great" doesn't necessarily mean great for them.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

~~20% of students with free lunch? So this guy is still too far to the right.~~

Edit: that was old data, apparently they’re also joining the free lunch party

Let’s go for 100% all kids all schools!

~~markdown sucks https://www.wgbh.org/news/politics/2023-08-09/free-school-meals-now-permanent-in-mass-with-new-state-budget it really does~~

[–] eddeeMN@poweredbygay.social 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

@AA5B Minnesota has free lunch for 100% of students with no forms or qualifications required

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago