this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
2 points (75.0% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4363 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raunz@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't quite understand how the science is clear if "there is still no data on the long-term effects of e-cigarettes".

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anything other than air going in to your lungs is bad. Vaping puts stuff that isn't air into your lungs. The science is clear on that.

Just how much damage it's doing isn't really clear because they're only becoming really popular now, but it is doing damage.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cool. The science is in, when are we banning coffee?

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m be fine with them banning coffee so that’s not the “gotcha!” you think it is. Alcohol too btw. Alcohol especially should be banned tbh.

Coffee isn’t inhaling stuff into your lungs that isn’t air though. I’m assuming you’re saying “caffein = bad”? People aren’t filling their lungs with caffeine from coffee.

Again - science is settled here. If it’s not oxygen it’s bad if it goes into your lungs.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do all of these articles always assume all vaping is nicotine-related? It's exchanging the words "e-cigarette" with "vape". Seems irresponsible of the author. It's like writing an article on the dangers of squares and mixing in the word rectangle

[–] handhookcardoor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Most of these anti smoking articles are written by people who don’t understand smoking devices themselves. Irresponsible for sure.

[–] Reverendender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How are the health risks of vaping marijuana?

[–] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(Guesstimating) Better than smoking, but as any doctor will tell you, putting anything that isn't air into your lungs is worse than not putting anything that isn't air into your lungs.

I say this as someone who both smokes and vapes cannabis.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Vapor Genie and properly vape flower. 0 side effects.

[–] ezmack@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I vape. I hate it, but its probably better than cigs

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I vape and I love it and it's definitely better than cigs. Nicotine on its own is no more harmful than caffeine and is incredibly useful at treating my adhd and depression symptoms. I smoked for 8 years and now have been vaping for ten. While I smoked I felt like shit all the time. Since switching to vaping I haven't had a single negative side effect. I make my own juice, it's unflavored. It's literally just nicotine, propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin, which basically makes it an asthma inhaler but for nicotine instead of asthma drugs. I never plan to quit because I buy the ingredients in bulk and it only costs me like $40 a year for me and my girlfriend. There is no downside. Yes I'm addicted but so are many people to coffee. I see no downside at all.

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see no downside at all.

Apart from the health risks, of course.....

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The whole point is that the health risks of vaping are negligible. I've vaped for ten years with no side effects. I vapid through having covid twice and recovered fine. Find me one study with real reproducible health risks to vaping, I'll wait.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean I just have to provide two anecdotes to disprove your one anecdote.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why would I google that for you when I can just tell you a couple of stories about people who vaped and got sick?

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, I've provided him with a study so we'll see if he responds. Here it is again for him to see:

https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/evali-new-information-on-vaping-induced-lung-injury-2020040319359

[–] Whirlybird@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't read it did you? Those were all those cases in the news and have never been linked to nicotine only vapes. It was from sketchy companies using subpar ingredients.

The most common brand associated with EVALI is Dank Vape, a brand of products containing THC, the principal psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. Exclusively using products with THC increases risk for EVALI. (It's unclear whether people who used nicotine-only vapes also were exposed to vape products with THC, or whether other ingredients caused the lung injury.) Vitamin E acetate is strongly associated with EVALI. It is found largely in counterfeit brands (and recently in Juul products from South Korea). Vitamin E is a supplement considered safe when ingested or applied to the skin. Vitamin E acetate is an oil derivative used in vaping products as a thickener. It is found in about half of the products associated with EVALI. A recent small study found vitamin E deposits in the lung tissue of EVALI patients.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How does one get started intelligently on this? I’m using disposable and would love to cut waste and expenses but I really like the draw of the disposable. I don’t care about blowing clouds. I want some restriction to the drag and would love to mix my own vape. I’ve thrown away over $500 of vapes trying to figure out how to get something that just works. I hate all the parts and settings with the ones I’ve gotten. With the disposable I can pick them up and vape. I don’t have to worry about what the wattage or other bs is. Is their an effective option for someone that’s not a vape snob? I just want the miller lite of vape solutions and while saving money would be great I already spend significantly less than I did on cigarettes, I mostly hate myself for all the battery and plastic waste I’m creating.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My girlfriend and I both use the little nord handheld vapes. Nord 5 or nord 50 watt is a good place to start. They're cheap enough to replace if they get broken or lost and they get the job done. Then you just need the juice. You can use any flavored juice from a vape store, or just go online and look for bulk nicotine juice, sometimes putting 'DIY' in the search can help. I got a liter for $80 recently, but prices have been rising in canada due to new restrictions. Still waaaayyyy cheaper than paying $30 for 30ml though. Then you replace the coil in the cartridge every couple weeks or when it starts to get burnt. The nice thing about the unflavored juice is no sugar or additives so it doesn't clog up the coil as fast. Super simple to use and not one of those big metal monster machines that people use to blow clouds. Fits nice in a pocket or purse.

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you very much for the detailed response, having a place to start makes it feel a lot more approachable.

[–] mindbleach@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"It beats smoking" is a low fucking bar.

The science is that putting shit in your lungs is not great. There's no upside for non-smokers. It's a lark. The only truly positive side is that it's objectively better than inhaling smoke, and that only matters if it's a tobacco alternative - and contains nicotine. Which let this low-impact delivery mechanism create new addicts.

Two decades in either direction and the calculus would be trivial. 1990, the way people smoked back then? We'd solve the epidemic overnight. Trade it for vaping in a heartbeat. 2030, the way statistics were headed? Pointless and inexcusable. A brief fad that would linger in countries with hookah culture.

Instead, the worst-case scenario happened immediately. The same murderous liars made money hooking a new generation with a fairly unsafe and hideously addictive chemical. Like they'd previously done by adding filters, and then menthol, and then cloves.

[–] Sausage@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Smoking kills 8 million people worldwide every year. I think it's worth pushing the alternatives.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem isn't pushing it as an alternative to already active smokers, that's what it was initially touted as...

The problem is it became the new smoking fad. People who never smoked are taking this up, and are now the new generation of hungry addicts to keep the tobacco corps alive and well.

[–] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then don't smoke or vape. No one is forcing you to. Please do not be a pearl clutcher and make decisions for everyone else around you. You're not God and even GOD gave people the choice to believe in him.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay but the only way we can not smoke or vape is for allayall smokers and vapers not to smoke or vape in places where the rest of us breathe. I can't even go out on my balcony for several of the otherwise most pleasant hours because there's a guy smoking cigars in the courtyard of the next building and the stench is nauseating. And there's always a smell of vaping in the hallway of my own building, despite it being open to the outside air at one end. Y'all are so anosmic you have no idea how far your vapor and smoke spreads.

[–] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

All smells need to be banned. Got it.

[–] Shrek@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe I read it wrong but what I got from it is this:

Vaping is good as an alternative to non-smokers. The problem is that it's being pushed to non-smokers. It's not as bad as smoking, but the best is neither.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

nah he just hates others who choose to do thinga they dont like

[–] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You really wanna police what other people put in their body? How exactly does it affect you?

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

second and third-hand smoke and vaping aerosols contain harmful, toxic and cancer-causing chemicals that can be breathed in.

[–] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then don't stand near them?

[–] mindbleach@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're why enforced civility is a fucking nightmare to deal with.

'This doesn't affect you!' It does. 'Well make it don't.'

[–] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

That doesn't invalidate my point. Yes, if someone is vaping somewhere inappropriate, that's not right. But if they are outside, that's really fucked that you think you get to dictate what other people do outside. It's their world too.

[–] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People should be properly informed about what they put in their bodies.

Edit: Just realised I posted in an American politics instance. Ignore the foreigner.

[–] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Sure, I can agree with that. Maybe we should start with the food industry first. Did you know there's an acceptable amount of sawdust to put in some types of food as filler? It really is horrific. Vaping at least is something people realize is probably not great for you in the long run... but people who falls for the shitty quality of food standards don't know what they are putting in their body either.

[–] mindbleach@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Addiction has societal impact. Reality exists outside the individual.

[–] PenguinJuice@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Not all addiction is negative