this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
178 points (98.4% liked)

World News

38548 readers
2347 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] karika@lemmy.world 67 points 2 weeks ago

By punishing Hossein Shanbehzadeh for making a point, they acknowledged he had a point

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 65 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Bunch of fucking fragile babies! Doesn't matter where it is in the world, the leaders are always 1 step away from a tantrum. Fucking grow up. You are supposed to be running the country not crying because someone insulted you.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

They reign through terror. This is not some tantrum, this is intimidation. By applying very disproportionate punishments they're sending the message that resistance is dangerous.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 weeks ago

Not to mention that if you're running a country, someone is going insult you.

Making everyone happy is an impossible ask, so if you can't settle for the majority being content, and probably not even being that vocal about it, then you should not be governing.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 54 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] ravhall@discuss.online 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Rivalarrival 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ravhall@discuss.online 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

“All hands, brace for impact!”

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So, the article doesn't say.

What the hell did the dot mean?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 85 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I got an answer from the article. Essentially this guy was a known critic of the government already having spent time in prison for very direct criticisms. So he posted a dot. A completely benign post and then the following occurred:

"[he] posted a single dot in reply to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's tweet, and that comment was liked far more than Khamenei's original tweet"

...and...

"Iran watchers say the leadership has felt insecure about the high level of dissent in the country for a while"

So a known critic did the thing you do to your old sibling where you put your finger an inch away from them and say "What? I'm not touching you. I'm not touching you!" and then your sibling is tired of your shit and smacks you very hard.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 76 points 2 weeks ago

lmao Khamenei got mad because he was ratio'd by a single dot.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When he gets out, he should tweet "!"

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

Bro he's not getting out They will probably kill him in there

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Absolutely nothing, that was the point.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah. Russia did the same to protesters who held blank signs after the invasion of Ukraine.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, the idea is the words are illegal to say but by saying nothing you know what they are protesting.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the problem with this is, you can arrest anyone, claiming they protested by doing nothing

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 18 points 2 weeks ago

Yea, well. I don't think it's contrary to the politics of the regime.

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

No, that was the dot.

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Damn, in Russia people were arrested for posting/demonstrating "no to ***”, but a single dot is a new level!

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the russians also arrested some just holding up a blank white sheet of cardboard. i think it was in an area where protests are forbidden in general though. however, how does the absence of a message qualify as a protest.

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In the same way and any dicktators need to keep stroking their dicks to feel good. No reason needed

[–] tal 3 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, if you don't suppress political opposition and people aren't happy with you, that's a real threat to you continuing to have political power.

They don't just do this on a whim.

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Staatsschutz und BKA sind Unterwegs

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 5 points 2 weeks ago

Believe it or not, straight to jail

[–] filister@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Authoritarian governments are the worst. Where any sign of dissent is severely punished by the ruling party.

I remember in my country back in the days, the government was spying on its own people, where ordinary people were snooping on their neighbours and reporting at the authority and people were put into correction camps and prisons for simply telling a political joke.