this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
1390 points (97.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5392 readers
3848 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

post textPicture this:

  1. You type on Google "laptop won't turn on"
  2. Google now knows you have a broken laptop and can estimate how desperate you are to fix it.
  3. Because it knows how desperate you are, it can increase shop prices proportionally.

You are going to pay the maximum they get you to pay.

That's algorithmic pricing.

The more companies know about you, the more they can predict and sell how desperate you are to other stores out there.

An internet-connected car knows much more about you than you realize. A smart TV also knows what you like. Your Alexa knows if there is a problem in the home.

Privacy is much more than just sensitive data.

It's about not giving leverage away.

Because algorithms will use it against you.

Be safe out there.

Nostr.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 215 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Here's the one that convinced my dad that connecting everything is bad:

Your smart fridge knows what's inside and knows you just added a 12 pack of soda and donuts to the shopping list. They sell that data to a bunch of companies, including your insurance company. They know you have diabetes.

Your insurance rates just went up for the fifth time this year because your insurance company knows what you're eating.

And it's a good thing you don't drink beer or your car insurance would have gone up 'due to increased risk factors.' too bad you wanted to buy a new car this year.

Not only can you not afford it now, the price went up because they know you want a car. I'm sure they would make a payment deal with you though.

And every company will know all about the deal, the beer, the donuts, and all it took was sending money to whatever company had the information, and they were more than happy to sell it.

The more we allow companies to freely operate like this without regulation and without proper punishment for breaking the rules, we will continue sliding toward the hellscape of Ferenginar. For the non trekkies, it's a hyper-capitalist species of profit-driven assholes.

[–] pufferfisherpowder@lemmy.world 135 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The best thing is these companies will say it's not violation of your privacy because they sell the data without a direct link to your name or address. But guess what? They bundle it with all kinds of other identifiers like age, sex, weight, approximate location, whatever else you give them. The insurance company then takes that and modifies the category that is specifically this age bracket, approximate location, weight, age, beer and donuts in the fridge. And surprise! You fit all these "anonymous" identifiers.
But no harm done, your identity is safe 👍

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 66 points 3 days ago (2 children)

it would seem like someone's name is the least useful data point

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's the whole thing about browser fingerprinting too. Take the set of internet users who have a particular version of a particular operating system, a particular version of a particular browser, having a particular set of typefaces installed, having a particular language preference, and you'll find yourself in the intersection of all of them.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Remember, kids, it only takes 32 bits to uniquely identify any person on the planet. That's 32 yes or no questions. Of course, they have to be perfectly crafted questions, but identifying power of fingerprinting must not be underestimated.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

Clearly we all need to upgrade our personalities to a new 64-bit architecture.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

To add to this.

Here’s a website to help you check your own trackability:

https://coveryourtracks.eff.org

It can also help give you advice on how to improve your privacy.

Things that help: (tldr use adblockers but otherwise it’s really about blending into the crowd)

  • using a browser that respects privacy (e.g. not Chrome)
  • using a “popular” browser (using something weird can help narrow it down to you because not many people are using that)
  • (Firefox is a good browser choice. Safari is fine, Edge is probably ok. Avoid Chrome).
  • using an ad blocker
  • using a VPN can sometimes help but can also sometimes hurt because, again, it helps narrow you down.
  • using a popular device can make it harder to track

Hard to track: uses Firefox with uBlock origin. Maybe using a popular VPN. Uses an iPhone or a popular model of Android like the Pixel (although Google owning Android/Pixel might mean they get your data anyway…)

Actually very easy to track: uses a niche Chromium-based browser you got from GitHub with niche GitHub project as blockers and a little/known VPN. Uses a niche brand of smartphone with a niche non-Android based OS on it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

when google gave away those google assistant spheres some years ago for free, i ordered one just to have one less of those fucking things out in the world. it went straight in the trash

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 days ago

It’s like Ron Swanson and the vegan bacon

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I hope you also advised to only use cash. When you use a credit card, not only does Kroger or Walmart know your dietary habits, but many merchants share level 2 transaction data with your credit card company, so they know individual items in your receipt as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 79 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In a past life I wrote the software that did this.

It’s not just about charging more when you’re desperate. It’s also things like charging you less to keep you addicted, or getting you hooked. Exploiting your emotions and behaviour to make it effective. A small loss on you now could be a long time gain for them.

Some more scenarios:

  • you’ve decided to quit alcohol. Your social media accounts are used to identify you’re looking for advice. They advertise more, and send you heavy, heavy discounts a few days in to keep you on the wagon.
  • Your cars insurance tracker has picked up your erratic driving. Your phone has tracked more forceful interactions, your works email provider has revealed you’ve been in a minimum of three meetings all day; You’re having a shit, stressful, day. They can’t give you discounts on your cigarettes but they do know they can get you to buy two packs instead of one by serving you ads that suggest stock levels are low. You buy two and chain smoke all day, your daily average goes from 0.5 to 0.7 packs a day.
  • You go to a chain restaurant often. They know they can get you to buy more in the long run if they increase the volume you eat gradually. Every visit they goad you into buying more. Didn’t do it last time? Steeper discounts next time. Until one day you buy the extra side. That’s now your new baseline. A few weeks of that and back onto the stair climb. A little by little. You’re spending more and more.
  • you’re on holiday. everyone knows you’re not coming back anytime soon so they charge full price. But move to a new city? Everyone has discounts for you to get you in the door.

The data available back then was pretty minimal, effectively only the data we generated. But it was still enough to prey on your lizard brain. With data brokerage I’ve got no idea what level of evils we could have done.

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for 'coming out' about it. Without doxing yourself too heavily, would you mind to share more about the industry in particular or measurement of these practises? Dip you know if it was common (and when was this?)

I know for sure that we can't trust companies to act in our best interests (if anything, its a hostile relationship), but I guess I'm curious about your inside perspective. Has that jaded you much at all?

[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 17 points 2 days ago

Social/Mobile games. So an already predatory industry. Let’s get people addicted to a game, and then suck as much money from them as possible.

In the industry, we definitely weren’t the only ones doing it. And really we were only doing basic stuff (it was all in house developed middleware, so effort vs reward didn’t make much sense to go hard) I wouldn’t be surprised if others were going deep.

  • the hardest part is getting someone to part with their money. But once they’ve done it once, even for the smallest amount, the second purchase will be easier.
  • conversions that stopped playing got emails with discounts.
  • whales got freebies when they lost to keep them happy.
  • everything else was just finding the customers perfect price.
  • ultimately we were selling noting. So any sale is better than no sale. You can’t make a loss on a number in a database.

Everything was broken down into campaigns (we’d have multiple running at any one time) targeting different segments. Then we’d track the conversion, sale, and retention numbers of those campaigns against each other. Sometimes one campaign might flop for one segment but not another, so we’d retarget with a new one.

I don’t think it’s used much in other markets. I know Twilio has Segment, that could be used to do segmented pricing but I’ve never really seen it done in other industries.

I wouldn’t say it’s jaded me. It has made me conscious of my data footprint. I don’t play mobile or f2p games. But I am weary. The COVID greed-flation showed the mindset of businesses. It might not be long until targeted pricing becomes worthwhile to make number go up (still), and hidden under the guise of “lowering prices”.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 107 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Protip: Before buying a laptop, google "homeless shelters in Detroit".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Google "I have way too many laptops and they all work great."

Google aggressively reduces prices on laptops to tempt you to buy more of them anyway.

You buy 3 more to go with your ever increasing pile

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago

Who would potential reselling business idea

"I have a compulsion to buy laptops but only when they're less than $100"

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Is that why I see all those "I have too many ThinkPads, I just bought three more." Posts, or is that just what part of the Internet I'm hanging out in?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cock_Inspecting_Asexual@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Memes are supposed to make me laugh.

This just makes me sad, and existential.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They also serve you the ads with the most JavaScript bs and crypto mining so you think your laptop is obsolete and you need a new one.

[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Without ublock Firefox makes my PC take off

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

If smart TVs knew what we liked, I don't think 90% of what's in the "most popular" sections of every streaming service in existence would be filled with random shit nobody has ever heard of. Unless they know what we like, and then just refuse to give us what we actually like... 🤔

[–] Disgracefulone@discuss.online 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're already paying for the streaming service. They don't benefit off of giving you what you want in that scenario

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They don’t need to recommend you the shows you already know about. They want to recommend you things you haven’t heard about in the hopes that you will find something new that you like so that show will keep you paying once the ones you already are watching are done.

[–] Disgracefulone@discuss.online 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This. This benefits them.

And if it fails, well again: you're already paying them.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can see how this would be a concern in theory but currently google can't even find me the products I'm looking for even when I type in exact parameters so we're a long way off from it predicting not only what you need but how desperate you are for it.

[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

Worked with both marketing and tech dudes many years ago, and two things I learned were (1) marketing guys overestimate new/fad tools so badly and (2) they (in conjunction with management) can be mercylessly demanding over TI guys.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The economics term for this is price discrimination. Nothing to do with racial discrimination, it's discriminating based on willingness to pay.

But usually it's not done by raising the prices above normal it's done by setting the regular prices higher and then offering a discount to people who aren't willing to pay less. People tend not to get upset when it's done that way. Student discount at the movie theater is a form of price discrimination. People accept it because they're being nice to people that don't have a lot of money. Seniors discount? Also being nice, I guess. But the reality is they know everyone else is willing to pay more so they charge more.

And this has already been happening online. About a decade ago I noticed what when I searched for flights from an airline then went to facebook, I'd get an ad from that airline offering a discount. Not as sophisticated as attempting to determining the exact price I was willing to pay, but it's along the same lines.

But the problems with these schemes is that people quickly figure out the system. I just made it a habit to search for a flight, then go onto facebook to look for the discount even when I'd be willing to pay even if there was no discount. But why not trick the system into thinking I didn't really care about booking the flight and get that discount?

[–] Shampiss@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

people figure out the system

Only tech savvy people figure out how to go around this system. Roughly 80% ~ 90% of consumers will not realize what's happening or won't bother figuring out a solution.

Hell, even if only 10% of the consumers paid a slightly higher price the company still earns more by buying your data.

Statistics are on the side of the company. Buying consumer data is always the best strategy for them. The only thing that can limit abuse of privacy and consumer rights is government regulation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Okay so fast-forward ~~ten~~ two more years beyond that (it doesn't matter how much - all of this is already in the past anyway:-P): virtually everyone (from your area) has an internet presence. But for you, all "they" see is a tiny stream of encrypted traffic to servers outside of your home country. Or maybe a large stream, whatever - are you downloading child pornography perhaps? Or are you a terrorist, trying to evade detection by the "legitimate" establishment, who is simply trying to "help" you to set the price for fixing your laptop?

Bam, they charge you the maximum amount for the repair anyway, then tack on a fee for the extra effort involved in having to investigate you further, making the final price double what it would have been. And this happens for every single item you buy, plus you cannot get a job b/c you don't have a FacedInLinkThread account. The best sheeples get the best pricing structures...

This isn't something that individuals can fight easily, without a rather extreme amount of effort involved. Hence we should fight it together.

[–] spinne@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Fast food joints already offer lower prices in their apps than at the drive through. You pay the difference through all the data they harvest.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I think something got lost in translation, this isn't literally about google raising your prices but about dynamic pricing + corporations having all your data. Google is just for the example.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago

Let me put on my MBA hat and propose to only show the user websites selling new notebooks and suppress repair shop or repair guide pages.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 14 points 3 days ago

guess what insurance companies make money off of ?

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that's very illegal here on Europe.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

We have the freedom to pay more!

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago (4 children)

this is why everyone should stop using google

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kshade@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Meanwhile I just noticed that my mobile provider (Congstar Germany) will be completely phasing out their online customer center in favor of their app. They already removed functionality from the site, like seeing how much data you have used this month. Why? The answer is in their huge list of third-party cookies I assume.

load more comments
view more: next ›