this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
387 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3977 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 92 points 1 month ago

College educated engineers for Harris? I'm shocked....

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Anecdotally, the few folks I know at these companies all think Elon Musk is a clown and do everything they can to keep their projects away from him.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You want to see what a project looks like after Musk gets his hands on it?

Cybertruck. that was his baby.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure his inspiration was from the cars in Total Recall. You know the weird flick where Arnie goes to mars and gets his brain scrambled and re-scrambled?

Also note he’s in on Neuralink.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They should support removing Elon as their CEO.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

For profit company is usually not ran as democracy, so employees don't really choose the CEO, it is the other way around.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's funny because the US is usually like "rah rah democracy!!" but also loves private corporations, which are extremely authoritarian.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

America was founded by a tobacco company. The Virginia Company had the first successful settlement. And then some obnoxious cultists got kicked out of England joined them.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Comparing employees to citizens is absurd.

  • Citizens pay taxes and receive services
  • Employees provide services and receive money.

The more apt comparison is voting citizens compared to shareholders. They too get a vote.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 month ago

That's not the point. The point is people spend most of their day under an authoritarian regime. Taxes and services are irrelevant to this.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Employees can buy stock (and are usually given stock as an incentive). Employees can also unionize and go on strike. When you have poor leadership, employees also leave for other jobs.

Most Tesla stock is held by institutional investors. It amazes me they haven’t demanded Elon move on.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

They won’t get far because of the sycophantic boards.

[–] AtomicHotSauce@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Because THEY are the actual brains of the operations.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

inb4 they're getting fired

[–] odelik 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Aren't they Ex-Emoloyees? Oh shit, sorry, they meant Twitter employees. My bad.

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I hope so. They can claw so much money out of muskrat while they land a new job

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

While I know we all love dunking on the dipshit Musk... the data from Open Secrets isn't exactly compelling that these people deeply materially support Harris over Trump. So they've spent a bit more donating to Harris... the amounts are honestly a drop in the bucket compared to the full budgets of these campaigns and I'm like 90% sure that a number of them are donating to SuperPACs instead so they can donate beyond their max individual contribution. So, personal opinion, misleading and not necessarily indicative of anything at all, as much as I would love to guffaw and point to it as more evidence that Musk is out of touch with even his own workforce.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

1 party believes in science and 1 party believes in nonsense. Guess who the scientists support?

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

‘Despite’ Musk’s support…

To SPITE Musk’s idiocy.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support