s have to stop trying to make "politics of joy" a thing
politics
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.
Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.
!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
Sounds like Walz got ez clapped.
But it still pisses me off they use “joy” and not “optimism”. The former just reeks of self-infantilization.
There is a very specific reason why they used the words “joy” and “the strongest military in the world”.
He didn't. But this was pretty much a stalemate in what could've been a bloodbath if Walz actually tried to attack.
JD just said he wanted to decommodify housing
fuckyoufuckyoufuckyou!
Love how dems will just straight up lie in front of everyone and we're considered crazy for not believing them.
"Politicians are all liars"
"Yes"
"Harris, Waltz, Biden and the other Dems are all career politicians"
"Sure"
"Therefore, the Democrats are also liars"
"You're just a Russian bot who wants Trump to win"
Waltz said the same thing and I definitely don't believe his ass either.
I'm going to do sudoku in the battle box.
Tim Walz school shooters???
Maybe the worst gaffe to have at that moment
WALZ SAID HE'S FRIENDS WITH SCHOOL SHOOTERS!!
Uvaldazed and Confused
Ohhh hell nawwww!
Vance is crushing, honestly
And then: Walz with a mealy-mouthed closing; Vance with a strong, sharp message that you deserve a house and a square meal, and reminding you that Kamala hasn't given that to you. And those baby blue eyes. It's too bad he's evil.
He's got the energy of a debate kid and the education of an Ivy League shithead. He struggles to appear like a normal person, not like a smarty pants fast talker.
No wonder he's crushing at a debate then
Yeah I'll be honest he's doing better than I was expecting. He's managing to not let himself get pinned down defending stupid things Trump, and even he himself has previously said, and has been fairly charismatic and articulate. Walz sounds incoherent at times, and keeps bringing up terminally-political-brained stuff without giving sufficient elaboration/context, so most normal people won't even understand what he's referring to. Vance is a piece of shit for sure, but he's surprisingly good at making Trump and himself sound palatable, if you didn't know better.
Harris and Walz need to stop bringing up Project 2025 in debates. All they have to do is say "no I don't support that, here's what I actually support". Immediate, easy deflect into a stump speech.
if you didn't know better
Exactly. He's really deft at framing, esp. in giving the viewers a permission structure to support Trump, and giving assuring, flip responses while avoid being pinned on satanic GOP positions, which is leaving Walz blathering, trying to clarify.
Lib alert
No you
"Mom, I want the Biden-Trump sons debate!"
Mom: "We have the sons debate at home"
The sons debate at home:
I can't take this any more. They're just arguing over who can more efficiently implement a fascist vision for America. Fuck this place.
Cackling as Walz is dropping spaghetti trying to evade his fib that he embellished his Trot credibility by being at a very terrible Tienamen Square protest.
Walz coming out of the gate with uncritical support for Israel's right to start World War 3. Absolute Joy Reich shit.
Yeah gonna get a lot of ammo for dealing with him after this I think. He finally has to say stuff out loud
I laughed out loud at the insanity of that first question tbh. "Would you support a preemptive strike on Iran? You have two minutes."
Real Amerikkkan question for sure.
"your weird sir", I say as I support genocide.
having both candidates be able to form coherent sentences kinda takes the fun out of it huh
Yeah they're being all polite and shit. I stopped listening once it was clear this would be boring.
Lmao the questions seem to be weirdly pro-Trump for CNN. There's this question about calling Walz out on a lie about going to China during Tianamen Square. Kinda just bizarre.
It was funny how when he "answered" the question it sounded more like he was getting defensive about going to China at all, rather than just saying "well damn I guess I forgot the exact details of something that happened 35 years ago" even when they asked for clarification, he just kind of reiterated the original claim that he was there during the protests lol.
I've finally reached the point at which I understand enough about politics to not pay attention to politics.
god i wish that was me
as with the kamala-trump debate, the dems are gloating about the brutality of their border policy while the fascists accuse them of not being brutal enough. americans' blood lust is insatiable
thankfully i apparently missed the part about palestine
Why can't they just cut the civility shit, I want to hear them shout insults.
Walz is cooked
My prediction of how it will look, coming back for a summary a few hours from now:
I WAS RIGHT!
off to a strong start with a hitler-off on palestine (walz won't even say the word 'palestinian' lol)
They're having a mid-off