this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
107 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13468 readers
767 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This is Dogphobic actually

[–] HamManBad@hexbear.net 40 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

The problem with subtext is that I can't tell if they're talking about Israel, or if they're a neocon ghoul who wants to nuke Iran. Or the US? Or Russia? The political content is completely lost in the subtext

[–] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 6 points 1 hour ago

To be fair "rabid dog" doesn't narrow it down much in the US

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 6 points 2 hours ago

The twitter user in the image has been on chapo, he's talking about Israel.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 24 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The subtext does make it clear enough that it's Israel because there is no other country that is acting as a rabid dog that belongs to someone else.

Yes, but some decide to live in bizzzaro world instead for some reason.

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

"Iran-backed rebels" though

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

shrug-outta-hecks call me when Iran-backed rebels bite children

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 hour ago

They haven't but what if some American imagined that they did? All I am saying is that overton window on this topic is bonkers enough in the west that the subtext leaves room for doubt.

[–] RiotDoll@hexbear.net 17 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

sometimes the dog is a beloved pet and the owner would rather annihilate the neighborhood than magdump into the feral beast

[–] SadArtemis@hexbear.net 13 points 3 hours ago

Sometimes the owner is also a rabid dog, tbh. And sometimes the owner's family is just a bunch of deeply inbred, rabid dogs. amerikkka ukkk kkkanada aus-delenda-est eu-cool isntrael

It's rabid dogs all the way down. The community will have to take out all the rabid dogs, not just the smallest and stinkiest of the bunch, otherwise the rabid dogs will just keep inbreeding and further inbreeding...

[–] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 8 points 3 hours ago

I mean, I'd pick Cujo over about 80% of my neighbors. Call the lawn police on this, motherfuckers! dog-screm

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If subtext is for cowards, what is cop-talk passive language?

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

The negation of the negation is distinct from the original phenomenon, so the negation of text being subtext and the negation of subtext being cop passive language implies that it is actually "domtext"

[–] Thallo@hexbear.net 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)
[–] frauddogg@hexbear.net 6 points 2 hours ago

...Damn! Y'know you on some quantum shit right now