this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
530 points (96.8% liked)

Fuck AI

1403 readers
679 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sag@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I think images on https://join-lemmy.org/ is AI generated too? Or Is it stock images? Sorry, If I am wrong.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

We're definitely too poor to hire artists πŸ˜…

[–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

Some of them look very AI generated.

[–] _____@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

100% what I think about this store that opened up close to me. it has AI food product images, whats the point? I sincerely dont understand how they think it helps

[–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

I wonder how much it matters for most people, though. If it's cheap then people probs still would buy.

[–] nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

original by @MojoboJomo on xitter

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, if it means the end of the advertisement industry, more power to the AIs.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 9 points 6 hours ago

Bold of you to assume this will actually stop anything.

It's like the Nigerian prince scam emails with inentionally bad grammar. They don't want to waste their time with people who don't fall for obvious scams, so they craft their email so that anyone with half a brain will reject it. And they still get millions of responses.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 81 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (4 children)

As if the average consumer thinks about advertisements to any degree of depth

Edit: also, the artist forgot to color the front part of the advertisee’s shirt. Ironic.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Implying deep thinking about advertisements is the winning strategy here...

Yeah, an AI would have drawn it better (apart from the text, they suck at that).

Also not a fan of comics that just state an opinion without any punch line or twist.

[–] zagaberoo@sopuli.xyz 23 points 12 hours ago

Naw, the guy's just a slut like that.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

And the left side of the advertiser's lapel.

[–] MagnyusG@lemmy.world 41 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

especially considering Coca Cola is one of the richest companies on the planet, they could afford literally whatever artist they want, and yet they choose AI slop, because it's "cheaper."

[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 8 hours ago

But if marketing manager 03427-B is able to save $5K on human generated art and launch the ad ahead of schedule that might tack another hundred bucks on his bonus next year!

richest companies on the planet

What kills me is how fucking awful their choice of slop is, since you'd assume their marketing budget is larger than the GDP of several small countries combined.

Like if you want to peddle slop, at least peddle good slop, and not something that would have been laughably bad years ago.

[–] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Easy way to make line go up.

[–] LodeMike 8 points 11 hours ago

Usually I go:

"Hmm advertisement. Must not be a good enough product to sell itself."

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

You don't need AI to generate hack art. Corporate Memphis aesthetic has been around for ages precisely because its cheap, hacky clip-art you can apply to ad copy in order to give it a hint of life without spending much money.

These AI models make the new art comparatively dirt cheap (if you ignore all the negative external costs) without relying on the even more cheap and bland techniques of the past. It's absolutely "better" relative to what's come before.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 8 hours ago

(if you ignore all the negative external costs)

This applies so much in so many different areas of society that we should have a Unicode character that’s like an asterisk but this is the only caveat that it represents.

[–] Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I agree, why?

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 5 points 12 hours ago

Yeah Especially if the narration is an AI.