this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
96 points (90.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43905 readers
1068 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In the United States, I'd probably name Oregon City, the famous end of the Oregon Trail and the first city founded west of the Rocky Mountains during the pioneer era. Its population is only 37,000.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Edit: I just realised the question was recognising the name of the city, not recognising city based on a picture...

Probably Svolvær/Lofoten with a population of ~4700. It doesn't have the official status of "City" in Norway though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 72 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, I would guess that school shooter locations are probably the most easily recognised in the US. Uvalde has a population of ~15,000, for instance.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 48 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 17 points 15 hours ago

Yeah Alex Jones can rot in hell

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

OP said famous, not infamous.

πŸ’€

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 10 points 15 hours ago

Ah yeah, I was going for instantly recognizable

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moreeni@lemm.ee 20 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Chornobyl, Ukraine. "50 thousand people used to live here, now it's a ghost town"

There are many more ghost towns now, due to the war. Adviivka, Bakhmut and many others, some small, some relatively big. Everyone has heard of those small cities.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

For foreigners, probably Abbottabad (population: 275,890) due to being the site of Osama Bin Laden's compound.

For Pakistanis themselves, it's a bit harder to determine, as I'm not able to find reliable population statistics for smaller settlements. However, some contenders are probably Nathia Gali, Chitral, Skardu and Ziarat. All of these towns are in the northern mountainous regions of Pakistan, which don't have as much population density as e.g. the plains of Punjab. They're also fairly popular tourist destinations for Pakistanis who want to take a break from the heat. Ziarat could be especially famous, as Muhammad Ali Jinnah (founder of Pakistan) spent some of his last days in a cottage there. It even appears on the 100-rupee note.

[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

For France it's probably Vichy, infamously well known internationally for being the capital of the French pro-Nazi government during the Occupation. Only 25'000 inhabitants.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Also consider that Roquefort-sur-Soulzon, of cheese fame, has 528 inhabitants.

[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I didn't thought of that, you're right!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 48 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I think people really overestimate how much everybody knows about the US.

I'd say there's a large population that only know NYC, LA, and Chicago.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 9 points 12 hours ago

Used to be Dallas was pretty famous- Kennedy shooting, cheerleaders, and a titular TV show.

I'd say Salem, Massachusetts (pop just under 45k) is pretty famous thanks to the witch trials.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 40 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Gibraltar has a population of 32,000, which by some definitions is too small to be considered a city.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ving_thor@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

The village "Wacken" is well known in Germany because they hold one of the worlds largest anual Heavy-Metal festivals. They have a population of around 2000, the festival regularly attracts around 80,000 people.

[–] nis@feddit.dk 7 points 12 hours ago

In Denmark it's probably Snave (No English Wikipedia page for it). Population is a whopping 211 people. It was popularized in a series of commercials for a Danish cellular carrier. The concept was so popular that there even was a movie. I haven't seen it, but the reviews seems to suggest it could be fun to watch... If you are drunk enough.

The word "snave" in Danish can somewhat be translated to snogging in English. Heavy kissing. Which has led to the city having massive problems with theft of their signs.

[–] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Not my location, but Scranton, PA?

load more comments (3 replies)

I guess the one that pretty much everyone knows in Germany is Buxtehude. It is being used as the poster child for a backwards town, far away from cities. Which is funny because neither is it backwards, remote or even very small. With a population of 40k it’s relatively large, compared to many other places in Germany, even just right next to Buxtehude. It is not far from Hamburg and its historic core is worth a visit. I think the name itself is the reason why it is being made fun of so much. Though there are so many other, much quirkier named towns in Germany but it somehow became Buxtehude.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 25 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Paris. It's also a city in Texas.

[–] earlgrey0@sh.itjust.works 12 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

I see you and raise, Las Vegas, NM.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Cairo, IL (Population 1,505)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not from there, but who doesn't know the name of Scunthorpe?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

It's a problem.

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Hallstatt - Austria

The city so beautiful that the Chinese copied it.

[–] nevetsg@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

For Australia I would go with Snowtown for the bodies in barrels. Or maybe Kendall where William Tyrrell disappeared. Both towns are pretty small.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (7 children)

Dildo, Newfoundland.

Not really though.

Off the top of my head I’d say places like Gander, Churchill, Iqaluit - places known maybe for their location as much as their people and unique situations?

Edit: another comment (Aspen) made me want to mention Banff but Alberta isn’t acting Canadian anymore so it no longer counts.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I had to scroll way too far down for this one, but it was the first one I thought of.

Another one would be Gary Indiana

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mingueo@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 10 hours ago

Well, Brazil is such a huge country and there are lots of smallest cities with still huge population.

Unfornately i would have to say that the smallest one and most famous would probably be because of some recent disaster and one I can remember is Brumadinho. Less than 40k people, a city destroyed after a dam collapsed and a lot of mud flooded everywhere, 5 years ago

[–] dunidane@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It might not count as a city but Nome Alaska has the Iditarod with only, 3700 people. Or maybe some famous battlefield, Gettysburg has 7100 people. A ski resort like Aspen could count with 7000. We all had to memorize state capitals so maybe somewhere like Montpelier, Vermont has more recognition but has 7800 people.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Sturgis also has a population of around 7,000, and has a pretty significant cultural awareness because of its annual motorbiking event

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Jeez, I had no idea Aspen and Montpelier were so small.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

If you mean people from my country.... All of them.

New Zealand only has like 10 actual cities. It is not some great feat of memory to know them all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Philote@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago

Forks, Washington population of ~7000 made very notable due to the twilight series. Or Astoria, Oregon population of ~10,000 made famous by the Goonies.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

How about: name a country and name the smallest city you recognize from there. Like New Zealand you could say Rotarua

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bkr78658@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

In Slovenia I believe Sevnica (4.5k population) - home town of Melania Trump - would be the smallest most recognizable place by the world.

But Slovenia is small enough even Kostanjevica na Krki with 802 or Vače with 421 population is easily recognizable by Slovenians.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί