this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
686 points (99.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26848 readers
4614 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 14 minutes ago

Oh I see, they mistaken thought the title was "No, MORE Plastic!"

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

How did he pick out the publisher... Just whoever was offering the best deal?

[–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

The way publishing industry has been for a very long time, authors (especially first time ones) don't get to pick whoever pays the best deal. Just whoever pays the first.

Edit: Also, theoretically, publishers should accommodate author wishes once a publication contract has been made. Actually not unheard of that a publisher would do something cool for their up and coming star. But this? Sloppiness on the publisher's part, plain and simple.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 minutes ago

The author doesn't get to pick who can print his book? Or do you mean he has no real choice because he's got bills to pay?

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No. He's that one unique author who looked for the worst deal for his work.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 minutes ago

Or terms he finds acceptable

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee -1 points 1 hour ago

No. More. Plasticccc? Whelp, there goes my new hip and wheel chair and pain here I come!

[–] spongeborgcubepants@lemmy.world 162 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was a typo, he meant: No, more plastic!

[–] Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lionel Hutz, Esq

Free consolation? No, money down!

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

Better get rid of this bar association sticker too.

[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I don't understand why some books are wrapped in plastic at all. Like is it to protect the cover? Prevent people from reading it at the book store? Some weird contract with a vendor that requires a percentage of books be wrapped? A quirk of the shop that printed the book?

It makes zero sense.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 57 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Probably so they can be stored carelessly in dirty warehouses that may or may not control for humidity

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

Used to work in a warehouse that did exactly this, can confirm drove a forklift loading pallets of books on trucks and “humidity control” meant closing the bay doors that didn’t have trailers backed in so the snow wouldn’t blow inside.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Aren't books shipped in boxes though? I guess maybe a printer might palletize the books and find it cheaper to not wrap the whole pallet?

It still seems like the individual book is the wrong place to focus on protecting it from damage it might incur in transit.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

They are shipped on shrink wrapped pallets in boxes. The thing is, your local Walmart/target/airport shop doesn’t need 1500 copies of the latest Patterson novel, they stock a few of each current book in store. Meaning that pallet gets opened up at a hub warehouse and 2-3 books are going to 2-300 different stores along with whatever else has been purchased that week to restock the shelf. That book passes though a lot of hands before you buy it at the register

[–] Chev@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Both is correct. But the second one is less about reading and more about making a crease. People who buy new books, want to be the first ones to read it. If they wouldn't care, they would just go to the library.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Them: *lists 4 options*

You: "Both"

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 0 points 2 hours ago

What do you mean? Of course I can count to two!

[–] ChillPill@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a typo, it should read: "No. More plastic!"

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

I shouldn't have this ALA logo here either

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago

He’s right about sleepwalking into oblivion

[–] db2@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plot twist: it was corn starch based.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 61 points 1 day ago (3 children)

that's still bad though. it requires petroleum based processes to grow the corn and then convert the starch into a plastic like substance when the book could have just not been shrink wrapped. i get that you're joking, and i'm being pedantic, but not enough people realize bioplastics are not the solution, they're a gap measure, like EVs, and i'm usingeyour comment as a soapbox

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Bioplastics also cause contaminated petroplastic recycling batches, are difficult to compost (my city, like many cities, does not have the facility), and release methane when breaking down in a landfill.

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

What’s up with cities (in the US) not having the facilities for this? I know it’s not a perfect solution but everyone I see walking their dog in Los Angeles has these compostable bags.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but it sounds like Europe does (generally speaking). Is it a matter of laziness or something else on our part?

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 hours ago

building these facilities must be funded by levies, and most jurisdictions vote no on most levies because no one ever feels like they can afford more taxes. really, if the world worked correctly, the richest people and companies would just pay for these things because society benefits them more than the rest of us, and we should receive benefits from society

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess they could have been wrapped in bulk, but I wouldn't say you can ship books around without any protection.

It could have been an e book though

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago

A paper band is pretty good at protecting a book in transit.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works -2 points 23 hours ago

My e-reader is e-waste.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What about cellophane?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Transparent paper just doesnt have the same luminosity

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 1 day ago

Plasticccc

Aye, but it’s based on a real treasure chest!