this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
296 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2458 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 71 points 5 days ago (3 children)

‘Your poll made Trump mad’ is not a valid basis for a lawsuit

"Wanna bet?"

-- Trump, as he files suit against WaPo.

[–] DoctorWhookah@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I highly doubt Donald would let anyone hold his fries.

[–] SmarfDurden@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Bezos: let’s settle for a few million to your ~~bribery~~ inauguration fund

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

No need to strike out the word bribery any more. Not like they even bother trying to hide it.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Strangely he's going after The Des Moines Register. Sound like a small newspaper company.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Makes for nice easy wins to pad the stats that can be used as leverage to get other companies to fold. The Des Moines Register probably one day dreams of having 1% of the resources that a company like ABC or a person like Jeff Bezos has, and they fell like a house of cards. If they couldn't stand up to Trump, some local newspaper has zero chance.

And then Trump can just use that as leverage to intimidate the next paper. And the one after that. The message is pretty simple. Whether you're some giant multimedia conglomerate or some podunk high school rag, if you anger Trump, he can and will go after you for it. It's insurance to make sure that the rubes don't get all uppity, thinking they're too small to be noticed.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 39 points 5 days ago

I'm surprised Bezos let them publish it....

[–] 4grams@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It wasn’t, but welcome to our new reality. Elections have consequences people.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ugh, I have to hear "elections have consequences" for the next term every time he does anything shitty.

We know. He sucks, it sucks, this sucks.

[–] 4grams@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That is ironically one of the consequences of this election.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Lol fair enough.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 25 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Fuck Bezos, America is fucked and Jeff needs to reap what he hath wrought

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Well you can put that on your "that shit ain't happening, money runs and is the game" list.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 days ago

that poll, where it was, and its timing--probably helped him more than hurt him.

[–] Lauchs@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

If this suit somehow won, Rassmussen would be out of business the next day as dozens if not hundreds of members of Congress filed similar lawsuits.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 days ago

Broadly, this is just the sort of thing that can be expected when we allow positions of power to be held by people who are mentally ill.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago
[–] smokebuddy 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They may be immune from prosecution, but is a sitting President immune from being ordered a Vexatious Litigant?

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

SCOTUS says yes, as long as it's their guy.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Correction. "Your poll made Trump made WASN'T a valid basis for a lawsuit." FTFY.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 5 days ago
[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

... ofcourse it is ... It just might not be a basis of a legitimate win but winning by draining the enemy of resources is a win as well.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

But soon it will be.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Sure, but have you considered how much easier it is to bribe/pay tribute when you pay through a bullshit settlement on a bullshit lawsuit?