this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
86 points (91.3% liked)

politics

25161 readers
2261 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I wonder what really bad stuff they are actually up to. This sounds like a blustery distraction.

[–] hypna@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The media keeps talking about how they've learned their lesson about how to report on Trump; that they're not going to get spun up about all the noise he makes; that they're not going to let him switch the story every week; that they're going to focus on the real, material things that are going on.

Well here we are again, writing deeply concerned pieces about a handful of tweets (or whatever they're called in Trump land). And here Lemmy is upvoting them.

Trump is a troll. Don't feed the trolls.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

I couldn't upvote this enough

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

~~Teasing~~ Having Dementia Hallucinations

[–] mercphilby@discuss.online 6 points 7 months ago

He’s going to buy Canada from Mexico, and make Mexico pay for it.

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Ignore distraction

[–] mercphilby@discuss.online 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

lol. As if Denmark is going to sell it.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It cracks me up the way he says buy and the us should own it. Lets say it even happened the way we bought alaska. it would make it the 51st state. it would make it part of us and much like alaska it determine how resources are used and likely have its own fund to encourage people to come liver there. but he talks like it would be a possession the way the us owns florida or texas.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Would not make anything a state. Have you seen Puerto Rico? Guam? American Samoa?

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

puerto rico is not a state because every time the opportunity arose they voted not to be one. guam and american samoa im not really sure whats going on.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh don’t forget Washington DC.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com -3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

oh common. do you think thats a legitamate example. it was carved out of maryland and virginia for the specific purpose of being the capital with no state having authority over it.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And the people who live there don’t have representation in Congress, but that’s not the point.

The point is that it’s not a state. Just “being a possession of the United States” doesn’t confer statehood.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

yes but again its not typical it was a very specific thing. The land had belonged to two different states. the guam, puerto rico, us virgin islands are similar but dc is in on way similar.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Alaska was purchased by the US in 1867. It didn't get statehood until 1959.

Being a possession of the United States of America does not automatically make it a state.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 7 months ago

true but its basically a bureaucracy thing at that point. as long as the it has a populace and they seek statehood its going to happen.