this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
459 points (92.7% liked)

Mod Abuse Hotline

97 readers
1 users here now

A safe space to report and discuss the daily abuses of power that occur on the Lemmy.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

For the record I was posting in support of inclusive language, but pointing out that context and convention matter.

They seem to have even scrubbed my comment from their instance, lol.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

As a SoCal boi dude is not about gender. It's a vibe

[–] parpol@programming.dev 104 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Blahaj mods (especially the one modding ghazi, transgender and 196) are the worst kind of mods. They promote blatant misinformation, remove posts calling said misinformation out, and they ban people and label them transphobes despite there being no transphobic words or implications whatsoever in your comments.

Just block the entire instance and move on. There are better instances that better represent the lgbt community.

Source: my ban message is the same as yours, and I have never said or implied anything remotely transphobic.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

What I hate about blocking instances is that I no longer seem to get inbox notifications when a member of the instance comments on something in response to me, outside of that instance.

Like, my beef isn't with blahaj users, and I don't want to unintentionally ignore them because their admin/s are nutballs.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 36 points 1 week ago

Unless it’s hexbear in which case the users are also nuts

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 83 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Imagine going out of your way to mod based on shit posted else where.

I have been saying this... We have too much modding for no fucking reason.

We literally got 50k AMU, and half the modding is based on vibes, I don't like the tone or content of the comments

As if there is not enough real modding to go around lol

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 27 points 1 week ago

The mod to user ratio in some of the communities is way out of whack. Just start with one mod who does nothing except manage spam and actual harmful content posted explicitly to be harmful. If the community ever grows so much that more mods are required, add only as needed and not more. And do the absolute minimum to make the community a good place to be, so it has a chance to grow and flourish.

What I'm saying is mod in moderation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

From the Book of the Dude, the holy book of the Dudeism religion:

Incidentally, the term “dude” is commonly agreed to refer to all genders. Most linguists contend that the diminutive “dudette” is not in keeping with the parlance of our times.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wouldn't be a leftist platform if they didn't spend the majority of their time and effort self policing based on their purity tests instead of doing something actually productive

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

The People's Front of Judea vs the Judean People's Front!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yokonzo@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (26 children)
[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm a dude, he's a dude, she's a dude, we're all dudes, yea!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not to everyone, and that's cool, until someone tells you not to call them dude anymore. Then your an asshole if you try to argue the gender neutrality of the term dude. Such as telling someone to get over it.

That's like anything. If my name is Abigail and I don't wanna be called Abby, I don't have to hear an excuse as to why you wanna call me Abby. If someone isn't comfortable being called a thing and they tell you so, you fucking abide by that. Everything else is weirdo behavior.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow. That is about the tamest comment that’s ever gotten someone banned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dukeofdummies@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I'm just glad I'm not the only one who views dude as androgynous.

I thought I was one of the few.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

I was once told my choice of defaulting to referring to people as they/them is offensive to nonbinary people. I don't necessarily know your pronouns at that particular instance of time when speaking, and being offensive is not my intention, but it seems to happen anyway.

Which is why I call they/them the equal oppurtunity offender. It doesn't discriminate in its neutralness.

Wait until they hear what non-binary sounds like in Spanish, a language that genders every noun as either male or female.

[–] DrPop@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least from one Non Binary, I default they/them and have no idea why I personally would find it offensive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] recreationalcatheter@lemm.ee 40 points 1 week ago

They could not in fact get over it, dude.

They must feel very strongly about the word dude. I'm in your camp on it. It's an exclamation, nothing more 🤷

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The key is that you said "but..." which in some communities fails the test of absolute 100% agreement and makes you The Enemy. I had a very similar experience there, in my case it was saying someone who is "uncomfortable" with gender issues might not actually "hate" anybody, they could just be having trouble overcoming how they were raised. But in the end it's like if a TV channel stops but you get thousands of other channels, so oh well .

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Joke’s on them, I’ve shadow banned them.

[–] Microplasticbrain@lemm.ee 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] schwim@lemm.ee 30 points 1 week ago

Consider the source of the action(a person pursuing a position of authority on a relatively miniscule network) and keep on keeping on. Decades of forums moderated by basement dwellers with a Napoleon complex have made it hard for me to take things like this seriously.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SmAOBbUiZcY

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Wow, somebody that day was salty, and pretty much just looking for a comment to get mad about.

There's another FOSS project idea: a bot that detects Lemmy bans and sends you a notification about it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Delirioum@programming.dev 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think there is anything like a shadow ban on Lemmy?

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (32 children)

It seems to be an unintentional side effect, that ends up being similar to a shadow ban.

What I mean to say is that I can still make comments on blahaj posts, but they will never show up to users of their instance. So, to me, it seems like everything is okay, when in reality, I've probably been commenting into the ether for 10 mo.

Example:

https://lemmy.sdf.org/comment/16663205

load more comments (32 replies)
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Blahaj is essentially the padded room of Lemmy. The users there never ever ever want to see a difference in opinion, a naughty word, or a thought provoking comment. They want to be victims and talk about cute stuff. Completely within their rights to make their instance the most cringe thing on the Internet and yet another example of leftists fighting other leftists and pointing fingers at one another over minor issues while conservatives actually are exterminating minorities at record pace and creating laws and regulations to destroy lives. It might be funny if it wasn't so sad.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 24 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I have also been banned from specifically 196 for a comment on a completely different instance. Reason: Transphobe. Because I was asking questions.

And it's kind of annoying that when I scroll through the feed, upvote a post and get an error. Oh it's a blahaj post... Sometimes I realize after I've finished writing a comment and can't send it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Alice@hilariouschaos.com 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's what makes Lemmy lame honestly

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Lmao they banned me for saying we shouldn't let trump get elected, the blahaj mods are awful

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was banned from a community called, "Pleasant Politics," that I had never heard of or interacted with, but honestly, as a preemptive move, fair enough.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Oh that place is an interesting idea but poor execution.

Last I knew they would ban you if you got banned from any of the news comms or had too many controversial comments. Which just boiled down to downvotes

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I remember the creator of the bot that does the bans insisted until he was blue in the fact that it doesn't ban based on downvotes while spewing a lot f technobabble that ultimately ammounted to banning for downvotes. So yeah, he's trying to bring back one of the worse features of Reddit, that being an ass kissing requirement, that's what karma requirements are, they are an ass kissing requirement, because the way you get karma points is by kissing ass, the way you lose them is by sharing new or different ideas. See the issue with them? The system punishes people for having ideas that other people don't like, not that are wrong or evil, but that other people simply don't like. That's not even mentioning people who cheat the system by doing vote manipulation to their own comments or to other comments.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I got banned from lemmy.world/c/linuxsucks, which is one person's mental illness, so who cares? Doesn't stop me from calling them an idiot when they show up elsewhere.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Where would I see if I've been banned somewhere? I usually browse /all so I'm sure I've commented and voted most everywhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›