-1000 social credit
World News
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
A planned lecture at China’s Nankai University was abruptly cancelled in January, reportedly due to “scheduling conflicts.”
Is he scheduled to visit a "reeducation" camp?
Source appears to be "dude just trust me"
is there any evidence of this?
What is a good source for this?
Gao Shanwen and and Fu Peng, chief economist at brokerage firm Northeast Securities, have stayed under the radar after challenging official rhetoric painting a rosy picture for China’s growth outlook. Even the South China Morning Post reported about that, citing Northeast Securities that Fu would not be making “any public appearances for the time being,” as public “misrepresentation” has caused “considerable distress”. Now it seems that also Gao will 'not appear in the public.' But I wouldn't expect an official confirmation by the Chinese government for that.
How can I verify this?
edit: to be clear i'm not denying it, I just see no way to do this at all, it's probably true.
Lol yea bro China is famous for openly sharing details about everything. That's why there are so many great sources.
The burden of being factual lies with the government being accused of lying. Xi can publish some uncooked numbers if he has them (he doesn't)
If this is our standard of proof can't anyone just make up anything about china?
Surely if somebody is reporting this, they have found evidence that it's true, thus, it should be verifiable, no?