this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
420 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19356 readers
1826 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) threatened to withhold federal disaster relief from California during ongoing Los Angeles wildfires that have killed at least 16 people and destroyed over 12,000 structures.

Davidson criticized California’s forest management policies, echoing misleading right-wing claims that poor management, not climate change, is to blame.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom refuted these claims, noting that the state’s forest management budget has increased tenfold since 2019.

Davidson’s comments follow a pattern of GOP blaming state policies for disasters, similar to rhetoric from Trump.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 96 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Almost every single red state is a welfare queen. They exist as parasites to better run, Democratic economies, and subsist on Federal largesse.

Let's play the game. Cut these shitheel states down to their state-level economies, and use the funding for programs that allow citizens to move OUT of those states.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

Now THAT is what I'm talking about! Finally someone who has an answer to the question "How and with what cash?", when we Southerners are told to "Just move!"

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 52 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Reminder that California pays the highest federal taxes in the country and has never once complained about the cost of rebuilding in Florida despite annual devastating hurricanes or rebuilding in "tornado alley" despite frequent devastating tornadoes. People keep rebuilding their houses there and we never say shit.

Californians did not build their houses in wildfire country, they built them in areas that were previously safe and have now become tinderboxes thanks to climate change. It's not our fault that we are stuck holding the bag, but at least have the common courtesy of extending us the exact same aid money we send out to other high risk areas.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Great post but I have one quibble.

Californians did not build their houses in wildfire country

In fact we did. Most of the state is comprised of fire-adapted ecosystems. I think it would be more correct to say that we built in wildfire country when the impacts of wildfire were manageable.

I only mention this because I believe it's important to accept that fire is good and a part of these ecosystems that we need to embrace if we are going to live in them. It's not that climate change has "introduced" fire it's that it, the scale of human development, and over a century of misguided fire management has made it so dramatically impactful.

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Okay, that's a very fair point. Perhaps we are not giving enough acknowledgement to the fact that we are living in a place that historically has been extremely fire-prone and that if we had bothered to ask the native tribes living here when we arrived, they probably would have warned us that settling in this area with buildings meant to last is probably not the best idea.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Absolutely. They could also have given us a lot of important information on how to handle it all through cultural burning. Instead we made their practices illegal and jailed/killed native americans for doing what they've done for millennia in part to "protect" timber "resources" but mainly to drive them off their land.

An interesting tangent here is that the ecosystems here are co-adapted to these cultural practices. IOW, native burning of areas has co-existed with and altered the landscape over thousands of years. The notion that this land was "untrammeled by man" is racist fiction.

Yosemite Valley is a good example of this and you can even compare what it looked like in photos from the 19th century. It was predominantly wide-open meadow with widely spaced very large trees that were extremely resistant to fire. We suppressed fire and now it's incredibly susceptible to it. Duh.

The good news is that we are finally waking up to the importance of this historical native knowledge and their practices.

Here's an interesting recent article on this: https://www.savetheredwoods.org/redwoods-magazine/autumn-winter-2024/banned-for-100-years-cultural-burns-could-save-sequoias/

And this one talks about Yosemite and nearby areas in particular: https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/how-indigenous-practice-good-fire-can-help-our-forests-thrive

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 92 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

That was the old thing. The new thing is bOtH siDeS riGgEd SyStEm!

Then instead of doing anything you do nothing and it's the same result. Much more convenient.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 63 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do it, do it. Watch the federal budget crash without California.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It’s not like we can just choose not to pay federal taxes in response to this.

(Would be nice if we just seceded.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aphelion@lemm.ee 51 points 6 days ago (20 children)

These idiots really aren't thinking through the repercussions of denying aid to a population that's greater than almost every one of their states. What happens when pissed off Angelinos with nothing to loose start driving out to Ohio with a few gas cans and road flares?

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 28 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd be curious to see how much $$$$ damage/relief is given to hurricane victims compared to fire...

Somehow all those Republican States deserve hurricane disaster relief but Californian's don't?

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Archer@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

There is a small petty part of me that hopes it degenerates into no aid approval for anyone. The South is gonna get more hurricanes, they’ll break first

I don’t hope that of course, because people will suffer.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not much. Ohio is covered in snow right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Probably the same thing that keeps happening to us: our state government will fuck us raw and gerrymander a bit harder as an extra fuck you. They might attack trans people and/or Marijuana in response as well as JD Vance decries such things as symptoms of coastal elitism.

Fuck I hate what they've done to my home

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 43 points 6 days ago

Never mind how baseline dry California is. It’s so dry, your lips start to chap just being there. Embers in hurricane winds landing on exquisitely dry grass, brush, trees.

People who live in deserts get it. A semi can have a chain dangle too low, hit the highway, and start a brush fire.

Pod Save America has some solid, direct info on it.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is where we are now: fall in line with status quo, or burn.

They can’t get the independent and free-thinking side of America to support them, so now they will leverage health and safety to force them into submission.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago
[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 6 days ago

So fucking tired of these clowns.

[–] nthavoc 18 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Honest question here ... What is Ohio good for? For a state that often determines elections and can have one idiot withhold money by a baseless opinion, exactly what does that state do that holds so much sway over the rest of the country and other states?

[–] kwedd@feddit.nl 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What is Ohio good for?

It helps you remember the Japanese word for "good morning".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It provides comic relief.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 4 points 5 days ago

When you're driving, it's better than Indiana or Kentucky or west Virginia, as well as being on par with western PA. So it's part of a gradient of shittiness.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Why do you think the kids use "Ohio" as in insult.

Like "You got skibidi ohio riz"

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Reminder that the late asshole, Jim Imhofe, did delay hurricane relief aid to hurricane Sandy victims. You don't see them attempting this asshole behavior for relief to Oklahoma or Florida. Every time I have suggested that someone reciprocate this behavior for red state aid, I have been shouted down. Because the behavior goes unpunished, it continues.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

It's important to remember Republicans do not see voting as a way of selecting representative leadership.

They see it as a litmus test for the peasants, any who do not vote for the One True American Party are traitors to the state and must be punished.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

Luigi-stares

[–] graycube@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago

Ohio was on the verge of similar wildfires because of the drought this year too. There was a stretch of several weeks where the shoe was almost on the other foot. I think it was more luck, than anything, that we made it into winter largely unscathed.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

California could just not pay the US gov that much easily. They get MUCH more from Cali than Cali gets from them...I hope it doesnt come to that though.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I thought it was well established that decades of forest management that included extinguishing every single fire is what has produced an excess of fuel for today's fires.

Edit: In case I am misunderstood, I'm pretty sure that kind of forest management was changed a long time ago, but the consequences are still evident. I am not saying that denying funding is in any way correct or justified. There is nothing about California's forest management that would demand that.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, so what's "misleading" is that they're using these talking points to blame current forest management policies on the problem. Also they're doing this so they can ignore/deny that the climate is changing and making the area more susceptible to fires, no matter what your fire management policies are.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago (2 children)

There's also the "California bad" rhetoric because nobody wants to live in shitass Ohio.

LMAO get bent Ohio GOP: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Ohio

[–] Pips@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Never mind that California probably has more conservatives than most conservative states...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

They stopped doing controlled burns. Climate change is just more fuel on the fire so to speak. Fire is natural, not allowing shit to burn away ungrowth has %100 not helped, but this is just repubs denying climate change like the fucking dipshits...as usual.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 11 points 6 days ago

Somehow, I'm pretty sure California has an overall policy of "no, you get to play by the rules, or we don't let you have money."

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Fuck Ohio then. GGez. Don't @ me about hypocrisy I'm done with it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

House Republican Loses Drinking Bet to Start Stupid Performative Shit in The Media

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Deny us aid and we stop sending you more federal taxes than any other state....by far.

We could use that money here.

[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Saying you a qon these days is advertising you are one of the very worst of human beings.

load more comments
view more: next ›