this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
261 points (99.2% liked)

politics

18720 readers
4803 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Republican frontrunner in North Carolina’s 2024 gubernatorial race made a slew of antisemitic comments over the past decade including sharing a quote that has been attributed to Adolf Hitler. The newly unearthed social media posts, first reported by Jewish Insider, also show Mark Robinson, the state’s lieutenant governor, comparing the tearing down of a Confederate monument to both the Nazis’ first mass roundup of Jews and the racist horrors inflicted by the Ku Klux Klan.

The posts are the latest round of controversy for Robinson. Last year, he was captured on video calling straight couples “superior” to gay couples. And after Robinson characterized being transgender or gay as “filth,” the White House condemned his remarks as “repugnant and offensive,” the News & Observer reported. Those comments also led several state Democrats and LGBTQ advocacy groups to call for the lieutenant governor to resign. If he were to win the nomination, Robinson would likely face Democrat Josh Stein, North Carolina’s attorney general, who is Jewish.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So this black Republican is defending Nazis and the Confederacy? Well, it's a good thing both of those groups highly respected black people.

Wait, they didn't?!!!

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

He's probably head of his local Black ~~Panthers~~ Leopards (Will Eat My Face).

Fine, it wasn't a very good joke.

[–] SomethingSomething@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

It's good in my opinion (which no one cares about)

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I liked it.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Would be better without the parens because it leaves something for the reader to figure out, but not a bad joke at all.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 10 points 10 months ago

He doesn't need republicans to respect him. He needs them to give him money and power and they will happily do that as long as he runs defence for them while they make life worse for other black people. As long as he has money and power he will be insulated from the bad things his policies might inflict on him.

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Antisemitism is a feature, not a bug in the modern GOP

[–] pezhore@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But! But! The whole, "We stand with Israel" - surely you're not suggesting that's ...performative?!?

/s

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's not performative; it's genuine but self-serving. The GOP supports Israel -- not Jews, Israel -- because its existence is a precondition of the End Times and they're trying to accelerate those so they can get Raptured.

I'm not even joking.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago

I long for the days when this would have been the biggest story in US politics for weeks.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Who knew Grimace was such an asshole?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The Hamberdler.

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So that means Republicans will eviscerate him for being anti-Israel, right?

[–] Wodge@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Republicans (or Evangelicals, who've taken over) only support Israel because it's a required part of bringing about Armageddon, so they can all go and get in on the rapture and the liberals can be left to burn in hell.

Division of Church and State seems to be yet another bit of the Founding Father's documents they do seem to ignore.