this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
278 points (91.9% liked)

YUROP

1686 readers
221 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Topics that should not be discussed here:

Other European communities

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The rare "very stable genius", spotted writing all-caps in it's natural habitat.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Jokes on him. What he sees as German conservatives is mostly in line with US Democrats. The German version of the Republicans are the AfD, the Nazi party.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I was under the impression the CDU had worse social stances than dems except on immigration where they shockingly actually act like Christians are supposed to (that part may have just been a merkel thing)

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Merkel time is over. The current CDU leader is a man owned by the chemical industry. The "C" is ancient history. The whole political spectrum in the US is so far right, a Republican party would end up under the feds scrutiny here, just like the AfD is.

Actually, a German "Republican party" was declared illegal a few years ago, and you need shitloads of evidence to do something like in Germany.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago

Reminder that even the lutheran-calvinist church (aka the protestant chruch) and catholic church spoke out against the CDU/CSU for their migration and refugee stands. The CDU/CSU responded by calling both "Left-Green siffed" and many quit the church

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 5 days ago

The current CDU leader is a man owned by the chemical industry.

Lol and somebody tried to argue with me that germany is not an oligarchy and there are no clans

I wonder how energy intensive chemical industry really is and what their main energy input would be

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 days ago

Yeah, "so many years", a whole 3.25 of them. Before that was Merkels forth cabinet, in the same party with the same coalition we're likely to see again now.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yea people think he means CDU but given he is literally a fascist demented grandpa it is more likely that he is either confusing CDU with AfD or thinks that AfD has won because of all the ruckus going on

[–] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

why is there a trump tweet on my all, better block this community

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Used to be that Truth Social was the evil Twitter, but now it's just an evil Twitter.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 160 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Dude does not understand how german elections work lmao. Nobody won that election, the conservatives got 28% of the vote. There will be at least a 3 party coalition and things could become pretty complicated.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 98 points 1 week ago (20 children)

I'm not usually one to agree with trump, but doubling your representation in a single election is a win. An incredibly concerning win, in this case. It bodes poorly.

[–] cron@feddit.org 88 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The "conservative party" is the CDU/CSU, and even though they won, they just had their second worst result since the 1950s.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

So while they lost power the far right AfD gained power which is a lot worse

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

This cannot be said enough to Anglosphericals, even the well-informed ones sometimes don't get it. Under proportional representation, you almost never "win" an election and that's the point.

It's a classic misunderstanding between two political different cultures. I remember once a German state election, I think it was Baden-Würtemberg, where the first-placed party had no friends so the parties #2 and #3 (the Greens were one) formed the government. The Anglo press just did not get it - a "the losers ganged up on the winners"! How could Germans possibly accept this travesty of democracy??! But the second and third parties agreed on more things, and between them they had far more votes! It was arguably more democratic than the outcome of a classic first-past-the-post election in Britain or the USA.

This silly obsession with winners and losers was why the Tories dominated 20th-century British politics even though Labour and the Liberals often had more support between them. It's arguably what sunk the UK LibDems' referendum on electoral reform under the Cameron government. And then a few years later Brexit got 51.9%, which for Brits was obviously a resounding victory so most of the the other 48.1% didn't even complain about literally losing their EU citizenship. The winner-loser culture goes deep for Anglos but it doesn't always serve them well.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 70 points 1 week ago

Who is the “GENTLEMAN NAMED DONALD J. TRUMP”? I know of no such person. I know who Donald J. Trump is, but he is most certainly not a “gentleman” by any definition I’m familiar with.

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 70 points 1 week ago (3 children)

GOOD TO SEE HE HAS NOW PICKED UP OLD MAN CAPS LOCK SYNDROME

[–] CouncilOfFriends@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I just assumed he was yelling it over the sound of a helicopter as usual

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 52 points 1 week ago (21 children)

The AfD is only second strongest party. Also, no matter what anyone says. The real winners are the leftist party who got 8.7%.

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm fairly far left but the strong LINKE might actually fuck us over pretty hard. They are strong enough that they’re able to block increased defense spending together with the AfD in a time where increased national and European security might just be our most existential issue.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They are strong enough that they’re able to block increased defense spending together with the AfD

Does Germany have some rules that defence spending requires a 2/3rds supermajority or something? Linke and AfD cannot stop anything on their own if a simple majority is required. The Union and SPD have a slim majority between them, and add the Greens and you've got an extremely strong majority.

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The only way the conservatives get the funding for increased arms manufacturing is by disabling/changing something about the debt ceiling.

Debt ceiling is in the basic law (constitution), which requires a 2/3 majority to be altered.

Linke are against the debt ceiling in general, but not if it's only disabled for military spending while still preventing investments in public infrastructure. I think with a bit of diplomacy and concessions in the wording, Linke can be persuaded here.

Edit: Or Merz can just say he doesn't want to change anything about the debt brake, OK. Saves him from negotiating anything I guess. Maybe the billions he needs will just fall out of the sky then.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 6 days ago

Oh yeah I've heard some commentators talking about the debt brake before, and how some are pushing to do away with it. It didn't occur to me that military spending would specifically be the sticking point there.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] vormadikter@startrek.website 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tell me you dont know shit about the german voting system without telling me you dont know shit about the german voting system.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago

Do not discredit our supreme leader. His knowledge of the German voting system is equally refined as all his other knowledge.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

so rich and can't afford a keyboard with a working capslock key

[–] Whateley@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

My elderly relatives type like that when they want to make sure people know they're very serious people with important opinions about the price of milk and Barack Obama being a secret homosexual.

[–] StThicket@reddthat.com -1 points 6 days ago

Looks like you are missing a few keys yourself, notably the shift an period key.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Notice how Trump considers America to be under him.

Not just in this text, but in all of his actions as well. He has no intention to be a responsible leader, he intends to rule, and to do so with impunity.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

"L'État, c'est moi!"

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, our projected future chancellor is very similar to Trump in certain aspects, especially rhetorics and spitting bullshit, then being utterly incompetent when asked specifics.

[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago

Fritz von Papen.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Trump you arent conservative Also you clearly dont understand how we do governments over here

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 6 days ago

He doesn't understand how they do government in America, and he's in charge of it.

load more comments
view more: next ›